journal article·2017-04

Effect of Mg/Si ratio on the microstructure and hardness–conductivity relationship of ultrafine-grained Al–Mg–Si alloys

Y. Han, D. Shao, B. A. Chen, Z. Peng, Z. X. Zhu, Q. Zhang, X. Chen, G. Liu, X. M. Li

Journal of Materials Science· Volume 52· Issue 8
Publisher page

Abstract

Ultrafine-grained Al–Mg–Si alloys with four different Mg/Si ratios (=0.75, 1.10, 1.48, and 1.94) were prepared by using extrusion and cold-drawing. The microstructural evolution during aging treatment was examined by using transmission electron microscopy. Hardness and electrical conductivity of the alloys were, respectively, measured before and after aging treatment. Experimental results showed that $$ \beta\prime\prime $$ precipitates were dispersed within the grain interior in all the four aged alloys. Although the precipitate size was insensitive to the Mg/Si ratio, the precipitate number density as well as the inter-precipitate spacing was greatly dependent on the Mg/Si ratio. The optimized Mg/Si ratio within present work was 1.48, which led to the densest precipitation, and resulted in the highest hardness and simultaneously greatest conductivity. These findings are rationalized by considering the precipitation behaviors in the ultrafine-grained length scale and their effect on the hardness–conductivity relationship. A strengthening model was proposed for the ultrafine-grained Al–Mg–Si alloys, which accounted for the multiple contributions from grain size, dislocations, solid solution atoms, and precipitates to the hardness. The calculations were in good agreement with the experimental results. Similarly, the effect of multiple microstructural features on the electrical conductivity was also quantitatively described by adopting a model. The contribution of precipitation to both the hardness and conductivity is well demonstrated for the ultrafine-grained Al–Mg–Si alloys, which will be helpful for material design of advanced ultrafine-grained Al alloys with enhanced performance.
Source: openaire · Quality: candidate unverified · Source record ↗

Research context

OpenAlex topics: Aluminum Alloy Microstructure Properties · Microstructure and mechanical properties · Aluminum Alloys Composites Properties

SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.

References (57)

Show source-provided references
1. Yuan W, Liang Z, Zhang C, Wei L (2012) Effects of La addition on the mechanical properties and thermal-resistant properties of Al–Mg–Si–Zr alloys based on AA 6201. Mater Des 34:788–79210.1016/j.matdes.2011.07.003 ↗
2. Yoshida K, Doi K (2014) Improvement of ductility of aluminum wire for automotive wiring harness by alternate drawing. Procedia Eng 81:706–71110.1016/j.proeng.2014.10.064 ↗
3. Karabay S (2006) Modification of AA-6201 alloy for manufacturing of high conductivity and extra high conductivity wires with property of high tensile stress after artificial aging heat treatment for all-aluminium alloy conductors. Mater Des 27:821–83210.1016/j.matdes.2005.06.005 ↗
4. Zeng LR, Song ZM, Wu XM, Li CH, Zhang GP (2015) Room-temperature workability of 6063 alloy for fitting clamps of overhead conductor lines. Mater Des 65:187–19210.1016/j.matdes.2014.09.012 ↗
5. Yuan SP, Liu G, Wang RH, Zhang GJ, Pu X, Sun J, Chen KH (2009) Effect of precipitate morphology evolution on the strength-toughness relationship in Al-Mg-Si alloys. Scr Mater 60:1109–111210.1016/j.scriptamat.2009.02.047 ↗
6. Hockauf K, Meyer LW, Hockauf M, Halle T (2010) Improvement of strength and ductility for a 6056 aluminum alloy achieved by a combination of equal-channel angular pressing and aging treatment. J Mater Sci 45:4754–4760. doi: 10.1007/s10853-010-4544-y10.1007/s10853-010-4544-y ↗
7. Murashkin MYu, Sabirov I, Kazykhanov VU, Bobruk EV, Dubravina AA, Valiev RZ (2013) Enhanced mechanical properties and electrical conductivity in ultrafine-grained Al alloy processed via ECAP-PC. J Mater Sci 48:4501–4509. doi: 10.1007/s10853-013-7279-810.1007/s10853-013-7279-8 ↗
8. Valiev RZ, Sabirov I, Zhiyaev AP, Langdon TG (2012) Bulk nanostructured metals for innovative applications. JOM 64:1134–114210.1007/s11837-012-0427-9 ↗
9. Sauvage X, Bobruk EV, Murashkin MYu, Nasedkina Y, Enikeev NA, Valiev RZ (2015) Optimization of electrical conductivity and strength combination by structure design at the nanoscale in Al–Mg–Si alloys. Acta Mater 98:355–36610.1016/j.actamat.2015.07.039 ↗
10. Valiev RZ, Murashkin MYu, Sabirov I (2014) A nanostructural design to produce high-strength Al alloys with enhanced electrical conductivity. Scr Mater 76:13–1610.1016/j.scriptamat.2013.12.002 ↗
11. Liu G, Zhang GJ, Ding XD, Sun J, Chen KH (2003) Modeling the strengthening response to aging process of heat-treatable aluminum alloys containing plate/disc- or rod/needle-shaped precipitates. Mater Sci Eng A 344:113–12410.1016/S0921-5093(02)00398-2 ↗
12. Yang C, Zhang P, Shao D, Wang RH, Cao LF, Zhang JY, Liu G, Chen BA, Sun J (2016) The influence of Sc solute partitioning on the microalloying effect and mechanical properties of Al-Cu alloys with minor Sc addition. Acta Mater 119:68–7910.1016/j.actamat.2016.08.013 ↗
13. Fallah V, Langelier B, Ofori-Opoku N, Raeisinia B, Provatas N, Esmaeili S (2016) Cluster evolution mechanisms during aging in Al–Mg–Si alloys. Acta Mater 103:290–30010.1016/j.actamat.2015.09.027 ↗
14. Loucif A, Figueiredo RB, Kawasaki M, Baudin T, Brisset F, Chemam R, Langdon TG (2012) Effect of aging on microstructural development in an Al–Mg–Si alloy processed by high-pressure torsion. J Mater Sci 47:7815–7820. doi: 10.1007/s10853-012-6400-810.1007/s10853-012-6400-8 ↗
15. Quainoo GK, Yannacopoulos S (2004) The effect of cold work on the precipitation kinetics of AA6111 aluminum. J Mater Sci 39:6495–6502. doi: 10.1023/B:JMSC.0000044888.01854.e110.1023/B:JMSC.0000044888.01854.e1 ↗
16. Lin GY, Zhang ZP, Wang HY, Zhou K, Wei YY (2016) Enhanced strength and electrical conductivity of Al–Mg–Si alloy by thermo-mechanical treatment. Mater Sci Eng A 650:210–21710.1016/j.msea.2015.10.050 ↗
17. Gupta AK, Lloyd DJ, Court SA (2011) Precipitation hardening in Al–Mg–Si alloys with and without excess Si. Mater Sci Eng A 316:11–1710.1016/S0921-5093(01)01247-3 ↗
18. Zhong H, Rometsch PA, Estrin Y (2013) The influence of Si and Mg content on the microstructure, tensile ductility, and stretch formability of 6xxx alloys. Metall Mater Trans A 44:3970–398310.1007/s11661-013-1740-9 ↗
19. Ding LP, Jia ZH, Zhang ZQ, Sanders RE, Liu Q, Yang G (2015) The natural aging and precipitation hardening behavior of Al-Mg-Si-Cu alloys with different Mg/Si ratios and Cu additions. Mater Sci Eng A 627:119–12610.1016/j.msea.2014.12.086 ↗
20. Bobruk EV, Murashkin MYu, Kazykhanov VU, Valiev RZ (2012) Aging behavior and properties of ultrafine-grained aluminum alloys of Al-Mg-Si system. Rev Adv Mater Sci 31:109–115
21. Jiang L, Li JK, Cheng PM, Liu G, Wang RH, Chen BA, Zhang JY, Sun J, Yang MX, Yang G (2014) Microalloying ultrafine grained Al alloys with enhanced ductility. Sci Rep 4:360510.1038/srep03605 ↗
22. Huang Y, Robson JD, Prangnell PB (2010) The formation of nanograin structures and accelerated room-temperature theta precipitation in a severely deformed Al–4 wt% Cu alloy. Acta Mater 58:1643–165710.1016/j.actamat.2009.11.008 ↗
23. Ma K, Hu T, Yang H, Topping TD, Yousefiani A, Lavernia EJ, Schoenung JM (2016) Coupling of dislocations and precipitates: impact on the mechanical behavior of ultrafine grained Al–Zn–Mg alloys. Acta Mater 103:153–16410.1016/j.actamat.2015.09.017 ↗
24. Ma K, Wen H, Hu T, Topping TD, Isheim D, Seidman DN, Lavernia EJ, Schoenung JM (2014) Mechanical behavior and strengthening mechanisms in ultrafine grain precipitation-strengthened aluminum alloy. Acta Mater 62:141–15510.1016/j.actamat.2013.09.042 ↗
25. Hu T, Ma K, Topping TD, Schoenung JM, Lavernia EJ (2013) Precipitation phenomena in an ultrafine-grained Al alloy. Acta Mater 61:2163–217810.1016/j.actamat.2012.12.037 ↗
26. Chen BA, Liu G, Wang RH, Zhang JY, Jiang L, Song JJ, Sun J (2013) Effect of interfacial solute segregation on ductile fracture of Al–Cu–Sc alloys. Acta Mater 61:1676–169010.1016/j.actamat.2012.11.043 ↗
27. Liu G, Sun J, Nan CW, Chen KH (2005) Experiment and multiscale modeling of the coupled influence of constituents and precipitates on the ductile fracture of heat-treatable aluminum alloys. Acta Mater 53:3459–346810.1016/j.actamat.2005.04.002 ↗
28. Liu G, Zhang GJ, Wang RH, Hu W, Sun J, Chen KH (2007) Heat treatment-modulated coupling effect of multi-scale second-phase particles on the ductile fracture of aged aluminum alloys. Acta Mater 55:237–284
29. Brown L, Ham R (1971) Strengthening methods in crystals. Elsevier, Amsterdam
30. Williamson GK, Smallman RE (1956) III. Dislocation densities in some annealed and cold-worked metals from measurements on the X-ray debye-scherrer spectrum. Philos Mag 1:34–4610.1080/14786435608238074 ↗
31. Gubicza J, Schiller I, Chinh NQ, Illy J, Horita Z, Langdon TG (2007) The effect of severe plastic deformation on precipitation in supersaturated Al–Zn–Mg alloys. Mater Sci Eng A 460–461:77–8510.1016/j.msea.2007.01.001 ↗
32. Jiang L, Li JK, Cheng PM, Liu G, Wang RH, Chen BA, Zhang JY, Sun J, Yang MX, Yang G (2014) Experiment and modeling of ultrafast precipitation in an ultrafine-grained Al–Cu–Sc alloy. Mater Sci Eng A 607:596–60410.1016/j.msea.2014.04.045 ↗
33. Chrominski W, Lewandowska M (2016) Precipitation phenomena in ultrafine grained Al–Mg–Si alloy with heterogeneous microstructure. Acta Mater 103:547–55710.1016/j.actamat.2015.10.030 ↗
34. Mantina M, Wang Y, Chen LQ, Liu ZK, Wolverton C (2009) First principles impurity diffusion coefficients. Acta Mater 57:4102–410810.1016/j.actamat.2009.05.006 ↗
35. Du Y, Chang YA, Huang BY, Gong WP, Jin ZP, Xu HH, Yuan ZH, Liu Y, He YH, Xie FY (2003) Diffusion coefficients of some solutes in fcc and liquid Al: critical evaluation and correlation. Mater Sci Eng A 363:140–15110.1016/S0921-5093(03)00624-5 ↗
36. Ma K, Smith T, Hu T, Topping TD, Lavernia EJ, Schoenung JM (2014) Distinct hardening behavior of ultrafine-grained Al-Zn-Mg-Cu alloy. Metall Mater Trans A 45A:4762–476510.1007/s11661-014-2498-4 ↗
37. Yuan WH, Liang ZY (2011) Effect of Zr addition on properties of Al–Mg–Si aluminum alloy used for all aluminum alloy conductor. Mater Des 32:4195–420010.1016/j.matdes.2011.04.034 ↗
38. Zhao QR, Qian Z, Cui XL, Wu YY, Liu XF (2016) Influences of Fe, Si and homogenization on electrical conductivity and mechanical properties of dilute Al-Mg-Si alloy. J Alloy Compd 666:50–5710.1016/j.jallcom.2016.01.110 ↗
39. Kiessling F, Nefzger P, Nolasco JF, Kaintzyk U (2003) Overhead power lines: planning, design, construction. Springer, Berlin10.1007/978-3-642-97879-1 ↗
40. Ji XK, Zhang H, Luo S, Jiang FL, Fu DF (2016) Microstructures and properties of Al–Mg–SI alloy overhead conductor by horizontal continuous casting and continuous extrusion forming process. Mater Sci Eng A 649:128–13410.1016/j.msea.2015.09.114 ↗
41. Morris DG, Gutierrez-Urrutia I, Muñoz-Morris MA (2007) Analysis of strengthening mechanisms in a severely-plastically-deformed Al–Mg–Si alloy with submicron grain size. J Mater Sci 42:1439–1443. doi: 10.1007/s10853-006-0564-z10.1007/s10853-006-0564-z ↗
42. Fukui K, Takeda M, Endo T (2005) The metastable phase responsible for peak hardness in the ageing temperature range 403–483 K for an Al-Mg-Si ternary alloy. J Mater Sci 40:3317–3320. doi: 10.1007/s10853-005-2710-410.1007/s10853-005-2710-4 ↗
43. Liu G, Zhang GJ, Jiang F, Ding XD, Sun YJ, Sun J, Ma E (2013) Nanostructured high-strength molybdenum alloys with unprecedented tensile ductility. Nat Mater 12:344–35010.1038/nmat3544 ↗
44. Chen Y, Gao N, Sha G, Ringer SP, Starink MJ (2016) Microstructural evolution, strengthening and thermal stability of an ultrafine-grained Al-Cu-Mg alloy. Acta Mater 109:202–21210.1016/j.actamat.2016.02.050 ↗
45. Kawasaki M, Figueiredo RB, Langdon TG (2011) An investigation of hardness homogeneity throughout disks processed by high-pressure torsion. Acta Mater 59:308–31610.1016/j.actamat.2010.09.034 ↗
46. Starink MJ, Gao N, Davin L, Yan J, Cerezo A (2005) Room temperature precipitation in quenched Al–Cu–Mg alloys: a model for the reaction kinetics and yield strength development. Philos Mag 85:1395–141710.1080/14786430412331333374 ↗
47. Myhr OR, Grong Ø, Andersen SJ (2001) Modelling of the age hardening behaviour of Al–Mg–Si alloys. Acta Mater 49:65–7510.1016/S1359-6454(00)00301-3 ↗
48. Bailey JE, Hirsch PB (1960) The dislocation distribution, flow stress, and stored energy in cold-worked polycrystalline silver. Philos Mag 5:485–49710.1080/14786436008238300 ↗
49. Hansen N (2004) Hall-Petch relation and boundary strengthening. Scr Mater 51:801–80610.1016/j.scriptamat.2004.06.002 ↗
50. Starink MJ, Cheng X, Yang S (2013) Hardening of pure metals by high-pressure torsion: a physically based model employing volume-averaged defect evolutions. Acta Mater 61:183–19210.1016/j.actamat.2012.09.048 ↗
51. Bardel D, Perez M, Nelias D, Deschamps A, Hutchinson CR, Maisonnette D, Chaise T, Garnier J, Bourlier F (2014) Coupled precipitation and yield strength modelling for non-isothermal treatments of a 6061 aluminium alloy. Acta Mater 62:129–14010.1016/j.actamat.2013.09.041 ↗
52. Deschamps A, Livet F, Bréchet Y (1998) Influence of predeformation on ageing in an Al-Zn-Mg alloy-I. Microstructure evolution and mechanical properties. Acta Mater 47:281–29210.1016/S1359-6454(98)00293-6 ↗
53. Murashkin MY, Sabirov I, Sauvage X, Valiev RZ (2016) Nanostructured Al and Cu alloys with superior strength and electrical conductivity. J Mater Sci 51:33–49. doi: 10.1007/s10853-015-9354-910.1007/s10853-015-9354-9 ↗
54. Koch S (2007) Aluminum alloys for wire harnesses in automotive engineering. Berg und Hüttenmännische Monatshefte 152:62–6710.1007/s00501-007-0275-z ↗
55. Hatch JE (1984) Aluminum: properties and physical metallurgy. American Society for Metals, Metals Park
56. Mulazimoglu MH, Drew RAL, Gruzleski JE (1989) Electrical conductivity of aluminum-rich Al–Si–Mg alloys. J Mater Sci Lett 8:297–30010.1007/BF00725503 ↗
57. Miyajama Y, Komatsu S, Mitsuhara M, Hata S, Nakashima H, Tsuji N (2010) Change in electrical resistivity of commercial purity aluminium severely plastic deformed. Philos Mag 90:4475–448810.1080/14786435.2010.510453 ↗