Monitoring pitting corrosion of AISI 316L austenitic stainless steel by acoustic emission technique: Choice of representative acoustic parameters
Source abstract
Abstract
This experimental work was aimed at investigating the monitoring of pitting corrosion by the acoustic emission (AE) technique, for pits developed by potentiostatic or galvanostatic polarization on two types of 316L austenitic stainless steels, in a 3% NaCl solution acidified to pH 2. The study of the evolution of AE global activity during the test showed the existence of a time delay before pits became emissive. This time delay and the AE events number rate measured during the propagation step of the pits are closely correlated with the sensitivity of the material towards pitting and with the polarization procedure. Moreover, the evolution of cumulative % of AE signals number versus selected acoustic parameters shows that rise time and counts number of signals appear to be discriminating acoustic parameters for monitoring pitting corrosion of austenitic stainless steels by acoustic emission technique in our experimental conditions, whatever the polarization procedure and the type of tested steel.
Source: openaire · Quality: candidate unverified · Source record ↗
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Hydrogen embrittlement and corrosion behaviors in metals · Ultrasonics and Acoustic Wave Propagation · Non-Destructive Testing Techniques
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
References (15)
Show source-provided references
1. A. Proust, P. Fleischmann, H. Mazille and R. RothÉa, in “Corrosion Deformation Interaction CDI'92,” edited by T. Magnin and J. M. Gras (Les Editions de Physique, Les Ulis (F), 1993) p. 829.
2. F. Ferrer, H. Idrissi, H. Mazille, P. Fleischmann and P. Labeeuw, Wear 231 (1999) 108.10.1016/S0043-1648(99)00120-9 ↗
3. K. H. W. Seah, K. B. Lim, C. H. Chew and S. H. Teoh, Corros. Sci. 34 (1993) 1707.10.1016/0010-938X(93)90042-F ↗
4. R. J. Grossman, IEEE Trans. Sonics and Ultrasonics SU-31 (1984) 25.10.1109/T-SU.1984.31457 ↗
5. T. W. Retting and M. J. Felsen, Corrosion 32 (1976) 121.10.5006/0010-9312-32.4.121 ↗
6. D. L. Parry, in Proceedings of 14th Conf. on Non-Destructive Evaluation, San Antonio, USA, 1983, p. 388.
7. F. Mansfeld and P. J. Stocker, Corrosion 35 (1979) 541.10.5006/0010-9312-35.12.541 ↗
8. S. Magaino, Boshoku Gijutsu 34 (1985) 657.
9. S. Magaino, A. Kawaguchi, A. Hirata and T. Osaka, J. Electrochem. Soc. 134 (1987) 2993.10.1149/1.2100328 ↗
10. A. Arora, Corrosion 40 (1984) 459.10.5006/1.3577916 ↗
11. R. H. Jones and M. A. Friesel, ibid. 48 (1992) 751.10.5006/1.3315996 ↗
12. H. Mazille, R. RothÉa and C. Tronel, Corros. Sci. 37 (1995) 1365.10.1016/0010-938X(95)00036-J ↗
13. K. Sugimoto and Y. Sawada, Corrosion 32 (1976) 347.10.5006/0010-9312-32.9.347 ↗
14. J. E. Castle and Ruoru Ke, Corros. Sci. 30 (1990) 409.10.1016/0010-938X(90)90047-9 ↗
15. M. Fregonese, H. Idrissi, H. Mazille, L. Renaud and Y. C Ètre, in Proceedings of EUROCORR'99, Aachen (D) 1999, to be published in “Marine Corrosion of Stainless Steels” (EFC series, Institute of Materials in London, UK).