Effect of melting pressure and superheating on chemical composition and contamination of yttria-coated ceramic crucible induction melted titanium alloys
Source abstract
Abstract
When melting reactive alloys, chemical composition and alloy homogeneity strongly depend on processing conditions, especially if melting is performed in ceramic crucibles. In this case, the nature of crucible materials, the melting stock composition and the melting parameters (atmosphere, pressure, superheating time and temperature) are critical processing variables. In this work, a Ti–48Al alloy was induction melted in a ZrO2·SiO2-based crucible with Y2O3 inner layer using different superheating temperatures (1600 and 1650 °C) and times (0, 60 and 90 s) and poured into a graphite mould. The influence of different temperature/time combinations in the alloy composition, Al loss by evaporation and metal/crucible interaction was studied for different melting pressures. Al loss was found to increase significantly for melting pressures below 10−2 mbar and increases with increasing superheating time and temperature. The experimental results concerning to Al loss are in agreement with theoretical (and experimentally validated) models available for induction skull melting of TiAl. Metal/crucible interaction directly increased with melting pressure, superheating time and temperature, leading to alloy contamination with Y and O. For the experimental set-up used in this work, optimal temperature/superheating time/pressure combinations that lead to acceptable alloy composition have been identified.
Source: openaire · Quality: candidate unverified · Source record ↗
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Intermetallics and Advanced Alloy Properties · MXene and MAX Phase Materials · Advanced materials and composites
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
References (39)
Show source-provided references
1. Edwards KL (2004) Mater Des 25:52910.1016/j.matdes.2003.12.008 ↗
2. Gebauer K (2006) Intermetallics 14:35510.1016/j.intermet.2005.08.009 ↗
3. Sung SY, Kim YJ (2006) Intermetallics 14:116310.1016/j.intermet.2005.11.025 ↗
4. Fu PX et al (2008) Intermetallics 16:13010.1016/j.intermet.2007.08.007 ↗
5. Shiping W et al (2003) Model Simul Mater Sci Eng 11:59910.1088/0965-0393/11/4/311 ↗
6. Tetsui T (2002) Mater Sci Eng A 329–331:58210.1016/S0921-5093(01)01584-2 ↗
7. Cui WF, Liu CM, Bauer V, Christ HJ (2007) Intermetallics 15:67510.1016/j.intermet.2006.10.027 ↗
8. Froes FH, Friedrich H, Kiese J, Bergoint D (2004) JOM 56(2):4010.1007/s11837-004-0144-0 ↗
9. Norris G (2006) Flight International (electronic version), June 2006
10. Froes FH, Gungor M, Imam MA (2007) JOM 59(6):2810.1007/s11837-007-0074-8 ↗
11. Imayev RM, Imayev VM, Oehring M, Appel F (2007) Intermetallics 15:45110.1016/j.intermet.2006.05.003 ↗
12. Jovanovic MT, Dimicic B, Bobic I, Zec S, Maksimovic V (2005) J Mater Process Technol 167:1410.1016/j.jmatprotec.2005.03.019 ↗
13. Liu K et al (2005) Intermetallics 11:92510.1016/j.intermet.2004.12.004 ↗
14. Sung S-Y, Kim Y-J (2006) Intermetallics 14:116310.1016/j.intermet.2005.11.025 ↗
15. Mi J, Harding RA, Wickins M, Campbell J (2003) Intermetallics 11:37710.1016/S0966-9795(03)00006-2 ↗
16. Harding RA, Wickins M (2003) Mater Sci Technol 19:123510.1179/026708303225005944 ↗
17. Frueh C et al (1996) Int J Cast Met Res 9(4):23310.1080/13640461.1996.11819664 ↗
18. Liu A et al (2008) Rare Met Mater Eng 37(6):95610.1016/S1875-5372(09)60028-X ↗
19. Gomes F, Barbosa J, Ribeiro CS (2008) Intermetallics 16:129210.1016/j.intermet.2008.08.008 ↗
20. Liu K et al (2005) Intermetallics 13:92510.1016/j.intermet.2004.12.004 ↗
21. Sato T, Yoneda Y, Matsumoto N (1992) Trans Jpn Foundrym Soc 11:27
22. Kartavykh AV, Tcherdyntsev VV, Zollinger J (2010) Mater Chem Phys 119:34710.1016/j.matchemphys.2009.09.021 ↗
23. Kartavykh AV, Tcherdyntsev VV, Zollinger J (2009) Mater Chem Phys 116:30010.1016/j.matchemphys.2009.03.032 ↗
24. Barbosa J, Ribeiro CS, Monteiro AC (2006) Portuguese Patent PT103018
25. Barbosa J, Ribeiro CS, Monteiro AC (2006) International Patent Pending WO2005/025778 A1
26. Barbosa J, Ribeiro CS, Monteiro AC (2007) Intermetallics 15:84510.1016/j.intermet.2006.10.048 ↗
27. Barbosa J et al (2006) Int J Cast Met Res 19(6):33110.1179/136404606X163497 ↗
28. Schadlich-Stubenrauch J, Dieckhues GW, Sahm PR (1994) 27th Dedicated conference on new and alternative materials for the transportation industry, Aachen, Germany
29. Jia Q, Cui YY, Yang R (2006) J Mater Sci 41:3045. doi: 10.1007/s10853-006-6785-310.1007/s10853-006-6785-3 ↗
30. Yanqing S et al (2002) J Alloys Compd 334:26110.1016/S0925-8388(01)01766-2 ↗
31. Jingjie G et al (2002) Metall Mater Trans A 33:324910.1007/s11661-002-0311-2 ↗
32. Mitao S, Tsuyama S, Minakawa K (1991) Mater Sci Eng A 143:5110.1016/0921-5093(91)90725-3 ↗
33. Takeyama M, Kumagai T, Nakamura M, Kikuchi M (1993) Struct Intermetall 1993:167
34. Okamoto H (1996) Binary alloys phase diagrams–aluminium–titanium system, CD-Rom 2nd edn. ASM International
35. Kuang JP, Harding RA, Campbell J (2001) Int J Cast Met Res 13(4):27710.1080/13640461.2001.11819409 ↗
36. Renjie C, Ming G, Zhang H, Shengkai G (2010) J Mater Process Technol 210:119010.1016/j.jmatprotec.2010.03.003 ↗
37. Bellot JP, Ablitzer D, Hess E (2000) Metall Mater Trans B 31(4):84510.1007/s11663-000-0121-0 ↗
38. Sakamoto K, Yoshikawa K, Kusamichi T, Onoye T (1992) ISIJ Int 32(5):61610.2355/isijinternational.32.616 ↗
39. Hadi M (2009) Russ J Non-Ferr Met 50(1):2410.3103/S1067821209010076 ↗