Physical and thermal effects on the shape memory behaviour of auxetic open cell foams
Source abstract
Abstract
This study examines the processing envelope related to auxetic open cell foams and their shape memory properties, with the analysis of four different phases of multi-component foams (conventional, 1st auxetic, returned and 2nd auxetic). The analysis of the shape memory and its correlation with negative Poisson’s ratio behaviour are a novelty in the field of auxetic materials. This study describes the differences between the multi-component foams used as precursors for each phase, exploring their mechanical and thermal characteristics at each stage of the conversion. The results show the important differences related to the mechanical behaviour of the foams, due essentially to the axial compression adopted during the manufacturing process.
Source: openaire · Quality: candidate unverified · Source record ↗
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Cellular and Composite Structures · Polymer composites and self-healing · Pickering emulsions and particle stabilization
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
References (23)
Show source-provided references
1. Lakes RS (1987) Science 235:103810.1126/science.235.4792.1038 ↗
2. Evans KE (1991) Endeav New Ser 15(4):17010.1016/0160-9327(91)90123-S ↗
3. Yang W, Li ZM, Shi W, Xie BH, Yang MB (2004) J Mater Sci 39:3269. doi: https://doi.org/10.1023/B:JMSC.0000026928.93231.e010.1023/B:JMSC.0000026928.93231.e0 ↗
4. Evans KE, Alderson A (2000) Adv Mater 12(9):61710.1002/(SICI)1521-4095(200005)12:9<617::AID-ADMA617>3.0.CO;2-3 ↗
5. Lakes RS, Elms K (1993) J Compos Mater 27:119310.1177/002199839302701203 ↗
6. Lakes RS (1993) ASME J Mech Des 115:69610.1115/1.2919256 ↗
7. Bezazi A, Scarpa F (2007) Int J Fatigue 29(7):92210.1016/j.ijfatigue.2006.07.015 ↗
8. Bezazi A, Scarpa F (2007) Int J Fatigue 31(3):48810.1016/j.ijfatigue.2008.05.005 ↗
9. Howell B, Prendergast P, Hansen (1994) App Acoust 43(2):14110.1016/0003-682X(94)90057-4 ↗
10. Scarpa F, Ciffo LG, Yates JR (2004) Smart Mater Struct 13(1):4910.1088/0964-1726/13/1/006 ↗
11. Scarpa F, Smith FC (2004) J Intell Mater Syst Struct 15(12):97310.1177/1045389X04046610 ↗
12. Scarpa F, Bullough WA, Lumley P (2004) J Mech Eng Sci 218(2):24110.1243/095440604322887099 ↗
13. Lipsett AW, Beltzer J (1988) J Acoust Soc Am 84:217910.1121/1.397064 ↗
14. Chen CP, Lakes RS (1989) Cell Polym 8:34310.1177/026248938900800501 ↗
15. Chen CP, Lakes RS (1993) J Mater Sci 28:4288. doi: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF0115493410.1007/BF01154934 ↗
16. Chen CP, Lakes RS (1996) J Eng Mater Technol 118:28510.1115/1.2806807 ↗
17. Wang YC, Lakes RS, Butenhoff A (2001) Cell Polym 20:37310.1177/026248930102000601 ↗
18. Alderson A, Alderson KL, Davies PJ, Smart GM (2005) In: Proceedings of IMECE2005. Paper IMECE2005-82404, Orlando, FL, 5–11 November
19. Bianchi M, Scarpa F, Smith CW (2008) J Mater Sci 43(17):5851. doi: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10853-008-2841-510.1007/s10853-008-2841-5 ↗
20. Bianchi M, Scarpa F, Smith CW (2009) Acta Mater. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.actamat.2009.09.06310.1016/j.actamat.2009.09.063 ↗
21. Scarpa F, Pastorino P, Garelli A, Patsias S, Ruzzene M (2005) Phys Status Solidi B 242(3):68110.1002/pssb.200460386 ↗
22. Odian G (2004) Principles of polymerization, 4th edn. Wiley, New York10.1002/047147875X ↗
23. Lou N, Wang D-N, Ying S-K (1997) Macromolecules 30:440510.1021/ma951386e ↗