Characterization and performance of porous photocatalytic ceramic membranes coated with TiO2 via different dip-coating routes
Source abstract
Abstract
Porous photocatalytic ceramic membranes have been extensively used for separation and purification processes. This study investigates the characterization and performance of porous ceramic membranes coated with TiO2. The flat sheet membranes were prepared via phase inversion. The membranes were dip-coated in different concentrations of TiO2 nanoparticle suspensions (0.01, 0.03 and 0.05 wt%) before sintering or after the sintering process. The ceramic membranes coated with 0.03 wt% TiO2 before sintering at showed excellent morphology with a porous top, dense bottom, and the cross section showed strong adhesion of the penetrated TiO2-coated layer on the surface and within the pores. This membrane exhibited the lowest surface roughness (0.05 μm) and optimum physical properties, permeation of pure water flux (128.28 L m−2h−1), rejection rate (86.06%), better antifouling (highest normalized flux ratio) and self-cleaning performance through increased humic acid rejection flux (94.32 L m−2h−1) and rejection rate (98.56%) subsequent to exposure to UV light. All of the membranes coated with different concentrations of TiO2 prior to the sintering process showed uniform, homogenous coating with enhanced properties and performance. This can be related to the good penetration of TiO2 nanoparticles and better absorption by the membrane structure. The accumulation of closely tied TiO2 nanoparticle suspension on the surface of membranes coated after sintering has essentially blocked the membrane surface and pores which might concurrently explained their reduced performance.
Source: openaire · Quality: candidate unverified · Source record ↗
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Advanced Photocatalysis Techniques · Membrane Separation Technologies · TiO2 Photocatalysis and Solar Cells
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
References (27)
Show source-provided references
1. Srikanth B, Goutham R, Narayan RB, Ramprasath A, Gopinath K, Sankaranarayanan A (2017) Recent advancements in supporting materials for immobilised photocatalytic applications in waste water treatment. J Environ Manage 200:60–7810.1016/j.jenvman.2017.05.063 ↗
2. Hubadillah SK, Othman MHD, Harun Z, Ismail A, Rahman MA, Jaafar J, Jamil SM, Mohtor NH (2017) Superhydrophilic, low cost kaolin-based hollow fibre membranes for efficient oily-wastewater separation. Mater Lett 191:119–12210.1016/j.matlet.2016.12.099 ↗
3. Zangeneh H, Zinatizadeh A, Habibi M, Akia M, Isa MH (2015) Photocatalytic oxidation of organic dyes and pollutants in wastewater using different modified titanium dioxides: a comparative review. J Ind Eng Chem 26:1–3610.1016/j.jiec.2014.10.043 ↗
4. Nair AK, JagadeeshBabu PE (2017) TiO2 nanosheet-graphene oxide based photocatalytic hierarchical membrane for water purification. Surf Coat Technol 320(Supplement C):259–262. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.surfcoat.2017.01.02210.1016/j.surfcoat.2017.01.022 ↗
5. Zhang Q, Wang H, Fan X, Lv F, Chen S, Quan X (2016) Fabrication of TiO2 nanofiber membranes by a simple dip-coating technique for water treatment. Surf Coat Technol 298:45–5210.1016/j.surfcoat.2016.04.054 ↗
6. Abdullah HZ, Taib H, Sorrell CC (2007) Coating methods for self-cleaning thick films of titania. Adv Appl Ceram 106(1–2):105–11210.1179/174367607X156061 ↗
7. Abdullah H, Taib H, Sorrell C (2007) Coating methods for self-cleaning thick films of titania. Adv Appl Ceram 106(1–2):105–11210.1179/174367607X156061 ↗
8. Syafei AD, Lin C-F, Wu C-H (2008) Removal of natural organic matter by ultrafiltration with TiO2-coated membrane under UV irradiation. J Colloid Interface Sci 323(1):112–11910.1016/j.jcis.2008.03.037 ↗
9. Yunos MZ, Harun Z, Basri H, Ismail AF (2012) Effects of water as non-solvent additive on performance of polysulfone ultrafiltration membrane. In: Advanced Materials Research. Trans Tech Publ, pp 46–5010.4028/www.scientific.net/AMR.488-489.46 ↗
10. Harun Z, Shohur MF, Yunos MZ, Jamalludin MR, Ismail AF (2013) The effect of crystalline rice husk silica on polysulfone membrane for wastewater treatment. In: Applied Mechanics and Materials. Trans Tech Publ, pp 798–80110.4028/www.scientific.net/AMM.328.798 ↗
11. Jamalludin MR, Harun Z, Basri H, Yunos MZ, Shohur MF (2013) Performance studies of polysulfone-based membrane: effect of silica morphology. In: Applied Mechanics and Materials. Trans Tech Publ, pp 8–1210.4028/www.scientific.net/AMM.372.8 ↗
12. Harun Z, Kamarudin NH, Taib HM (2013) Effect of rice husk on fired ceramic shell strength. In: Advanced Materials Research. Trans Tech Publ, pp 732-73710.4028/www.scientific.net/AMR.795.732 ↗
13. Harun Z, Kamarudin NH, Ibrahim M, Idris MI, Ahmad S (2015) Reinforced green ceramic shell mould for investment casting process. In: Advanced Materials Research. Trans Tech Publ, pp 415–41910.4028/www.scientific.net/AMR.1087.415 ↗
14. Oun A, Tahri N, Mahouche-Chergui S, Carbonnier B, Majumdar S, Sarkar S, Sahoo GC, Ben Amar R (2017) Tubular ultrafiltration ceramic membrane based on titania nanoparticles immobilized on macroporous clay-alumina support: elaboration, characterization and application to dye removal. Sep Purif Technol 188:126–133. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.seppur.2017.07.00510.1016/j.seppur.2017.07.005 ↗
15. Li K (2007) Ceramic membranes for separation and reaction. Wiley, New York10.1002/9780470319475 ↗
16. Li X, Sotto A, Li J, Van der Bruggen B (2017) Progress and perspectives for synthesis of sustainable antifouling composite membranes containing in situ generated nanoparticles. J Membrane Sci 524:502–52810.1016/j.memsci.2016.11.040 ↗
17. Hristov P, Yoleva A, Djambazov S, Chukovska I, Dimitrov D (2012) Preparation and characterization of porous ceramic membranes for micro-filtration from natural zeolite. J Univ Chem Technol Metall 47(4):476–480
18. Razmjou A, Resosudarmo A, Holmes RL, Li H, Mansouri J, Chen V (2012) The effect of modified TiO 2 nanoparticles on the polyethersulfone ultrafiltration hollow fiber membranes. Desalination 287:271–28010.1016/j.desal.2011.11.025 ↗
19. Katsoufidou K, Yiantsios SG, Karabelas AJ (2005) A study of ultrafiltration membrane fouling by humic acids and flux recovery by backwashing: experiments and modeling. J Membrane Sci 266(1):40–50. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.memsci.2005.05.00910.1016/j.memsci.2005.05.009 ↗
20. Hamid NAA, Ismail AF, Matsuura T, Zularisam AW, Lau WJ, Yuliwati E, Abdullah MS (2011) Morphological and separation performance study of polysulfone/titanium dioxide (PSF/TiO2) ultrafiltration membranes for humic acid removal. Desalination 273(1):85–92. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.desal.2010.12.05210.1016/j.desal.2010.12.052 ↗
21. Stevenson FJ (1994) Humus chemistry: genesis, composition, reactions. Wiley, New York
22. Xue G, Liu H, Chen Q, Hills C, Tyrer M, Innocent F (2011) Synergy between surface adsorption and photocatalysis during degradation of humic acid on TiO 2/activated carbon composites. J Hazard Mater 186(1):765–77210.1016/j.jhazmat.2010.11.063 ↗
23. Birben NC, Uyguner-Demirel CS, Kavurmaci SS, Gürkan YY, Turkten N, Cinar Z, Bekbolet M (2017) Application of Fe-doped TiO2 specimens for the solar photocatalytic degradation of humic acid. Catal Today 281:78–8410.1016/j.cattod.2016.06.020 ↗
24. Leong S, Razmjou A, Wang K, Hapgood K, Zhang X, Wang H (2014) TiO2 based photocatalytic membranes: a review. J Membrane Sci 472:167–18410.1016/j.memsci.2014.08.016 ↗
25. Fukushima M, Tatsumi K, Nagao S (2001) Degradation characteristics of humic acid during photo-Fenton processes. Environ Sci Technol 35(18):3683–369010.1021/es0018825 ↗
26. Xue G, Liu H, Chen Q, Hills C, Tyrer M, Innocent F (2011) Synergy between surface adsorption and photocatalysis during degradation of humic acid on TiO 2/activated carbon composites. J Hazard Mater 186(1):765–77210.1016/j.jhazmat.2010.11.063 ↗
27. Park H, Park Y, Kim W, Choi W (2013) Surface modification of TiO2 photocatalyst for environmental applications. J Photochem Photobiol C Photochem Rev 15:1–2010.1016/j.jphotochemrev.2012.10.001 ↗