Preparation and characterization of poly(ether ether ketone)/poly(ether imide) [PEEK/PEI] blends for fused filament fabrication
Source abstract
Abstract
The present study focuses on the preparation and characterization of a poly(ether ether ketone)/poly(ether imide) [PEEK/PEI] blend for application in additive manufacturing using fused filament fabrication (FFF). Polymer miscibility was evaluated using differential scanning calorimetry analysis and Fourier transform infrared analysis. The results confirmed the full miscibility of PEEK and PEI at all compositions. Seen as the best compromise between mechanical properties and glass transition temperature, a 70/30 wt/wt% PEEK/PEI blend was extruded into filaments for use by FFF. Nozzle temperature, layer orientation, and layer thickness were selected as printing parameters to evaluate their effect on the tensile properties and degree of crystallinity ( $${{X}}_{\mathrm{c}})$$ . Optimum printing parameters were achieved at 380 °C nozzle temperature, a [0/15/−15°] layer orientation, and a 0.15 mm layer thickness. The printed PEEK/PEI samples were annealed at various temperatures to erase residual thermal stress generated during printing. Samples annealed for two hours at 200 °C have improved elastic modulus by 21.6%, while $${{X}}_{\mathrm{c}}$$ increased by 24.3%. Adding 30 wt% of PEI to the semicrystalline PEEK yielded three advantages, namely improving the operating and service temperatures by 20 °C, decreasing the processing temperature by 20 °C while maintaining most of the high tensile properties of PEEK.
Source: openaire · Quality: candidate unverified · Source record ↗
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Additive Manufacturing and 3D Printing Technologies · biodegradable polymer synthesis and properties · Advanced Sensor and Energy Harvesting Materials
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
References (69)
Show source-provided references
1. De Leon AC, Chen Q, Palaganas NB, Palaganas JO, Manapat J, Advincula RC (2016) High performance polymer nanocomposites for additive manufacturing applications. React Funct Polym 103:141–155. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.reactfunctpolym.2016.04.01010.1016/j.reactfunctpolym.2016.04.010 ↗
2. Vanaei S, Parizi MS, Vanaei S, Salemizadehparizi F, Vanaei HR (2021) An Overview on materials and techniques in 3D bioprinting toward biomedical application. Eng Regen 2:1–18. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.engreg.2020.12.00110.1016/j.engreg.2020.12.001 ↗
3. Holycross DR, Chai M (2013) Comprehensive NMR studies of the structures and properties of PEI polymers. Macromolecules 46:6891–6897. https://doi.org/10.1021/ma401179610.1021/ma4011796 ↗
4. Abate L, Blanco I, Orestano A, Pollicino A, Recca A (2005) Kinetics of the isothermal degradation of model polymers containing ether, ketone and sulfone groups. Polym Degrad Stab 87:271–278. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.polymdegradstab.2004.06.01110.1016/j.polymdegradstab.2004.06.011 ↗
5. Mittal V (2011) High performance polymers and engineering. Plastics. https://doi.org/10.1002/978111817195010.1002/9781118171950 ↗
6. El Magri A, Vanaei S, Vaudreuil S (2021) An overview on the influence of process parameters through the characteristic of 3D-printed PEEK and PEI parts. High Perform Polym. https://doi.org/10.1177/0954008321100996110.1177/09540083211009961 ↗
7. Rinaldi M, Ghidini T, Cecchini F, Brandao A, Nanni F (2018) Additive layer manufacturing of poly (ether ether ketone) via FDM. Compos Part B Eng 145:162–172. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compositesb.2018.03.02910.1016/j.compositesb.2018.03.029 ↗
8. El Magri A, El Mabrouk K, Vaudreuil S, Chibane H, Ebn Touhami M (2020) Optimization of printing parameters for improvement of mechanical and thermal performances of 3D printed poly(ether ether ketone) parts. J Appl Polym Sci. https://doi.org/10.1002/app.4908710.1002/app.49087 ↗
9. Zalaznik M, Kalin M, Novak S (2016) Influence of the processing temperature on the tribological and mechanical properties of poly-ether-ether-ketone (PEEK) polymer. Tribol Int 94:92–97. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.triboint.2015.08.01610.1016/j.triboint.2015.08.016 ↗
10. Shibata M, Fang Z, Yosomiya R (2001) Miscibility and crystallization behavior of poly(ether ether ketone)/poly(ether imide) blends. Appl Polym Sci 80:769–775. https://doi.org/10.1002/1097-4628(20010502)80:5%3c769::AID-APP1153%3e3.0.CO;2-B10.1002/1097-4628(20010502)80:5<769::AID-APP1153>3.0.CO;2-B ↗
11. Crevecoeur G, Groeninckx G (1991) Binary blends of poly(ether ether ketone) and poly(ether imide). Miscibility, crystallization behavior, and semicrystalline morphology. Macromolecules 24:1190–1195. https://doi.org/10.1021/ma00005a03410.1021/ma00005a034 ↗
12. Hudson SD, Davis DD, Lovinger AJ (1992) Semicrystalline morphology of poly(aryl ether ether ketone)/poly(ether imide) blends. Macromolecules 25:1759–176510.1021/ma00032a021 ↗
13. Krajangsawasdi N, Blok LG, Hamerton I, Longana ML, Woods BKS, Ivanov DS (2021) Fused deposition modelling of fibre reinforced polymer composites: a parametric review. J Compos Sci 5:29-38. https://doi.org/10.3390/jcs501002910.3390/jcs5010029 ↗
14. Blanco I (2020) The use of composite materials in 3D printing. J Compos Sci 4:42-44. https://doi.org/10.3390/jcs402004210.3390/jcs4020042 ↗
15. Valentan B, Kadivnik Ž, Brajlih T, Anderson A, Drstvensek I (2013) Processing poly(ether ether ketone) on a 3D printer for thermoplastic modelling. Mater Tehnol 47:715–721
16. Askanian H, Muranaka de Lima D, Commereuc S, Verney V (2018) Toward a Better understanding of the fused deposition modeling process: comparison with injection molding. 3D Print Addit Manuf 5: 319–327. https://doi.org/10.1089/3dp.2017.006010.1089/3dp.2017.0060 ↗
17. Cicala G, Ognibene G, Portuesi S, Blanco I, Rapisarda M, Pergolizzi E, Recca G (2018) Comparison of Ultem 9085 used in fused deposition modelling (FDM) with polytherimide blends. Materials 11:1–14. https://doi.org/10.3390/ma1102028510.3390/ma11020285 ↗
18. Magalhães LC, Volpato N, Luersen MA (2014) Evaluation of stiffness and strength in fused deposition sandwich specimens. J Braz Soc Mech Sci Eng 36:449–459. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40430-013-0111-110.1007/s40430-013-0111-1 ↗
19. Weng Z, Wang J, Senthil T, Wu L (2016) Mechanical and thermal properties of ABS/montmorillonite nanocomposites for fused deposition modeling 3D printing. Mater Des 102:276–283. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.matdes.2016.04.04510.1016/j.matdes.2016.04.045 ↗
20. Hu B, Duan X, Xing Z, Xu Z, Du C, Zhou H, Chen R, Shan B (2019) Improved design of fused deposition modeling equipment for 3D printing of high-performance PEEK parts. Mech Mater. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.mechmat.2019.10313910.1016/j.mechmat.2019.103139 ↗
21. Vanaei HR, Raissi K, Deligant M, Shirinbayan M, Fitoussi J, Khelladi S, Tcharkhtchi A (2020) Toward the understanding of temperature effect on bonding strength, dimensions and geometry of 3D-printed parts. J Mater Sci 55:14677–14689. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10853-020-05057-910.1007/s10853-020-05057-9 ↗
22. Vanaei H, Shirinbayan M, Deligant M, Raissi K, Fitoussi J, Khelladi S, Tcharkhtchi A (2020) Influence of process parameters on thermal and mechanical properties of polylactic acid fabricated by fused filament fabrication. Polym Eng Sci. https://doi.org/10.1002/pen.2541910.1002/pen.25419 ↗
23. Vaezi M, Yang S (2015) Extrusion-based additive manufacturing of PEEK for biomedical applications. Virtual Phys Prototyp 10:123–135. https://doi.org/10.1080/17452759.2015.109705310.1080/17452759.2015.1097053 ↗
24. Yang C, Tian X, Li D, Cao Y, Zhao F, Shi C (2017) Influence of thermal processing conditions in 3D printing on the crystallinity and mechanical properties of PEEK material. J Mater Process Technol 248:1–7. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jmatprotec.2017.04.02710.1016/j.jmatprotec.2017.04.027 ↗
25. Ding S, Zou B, Wang P, Ding H (2019) Effects of nozzle temperature and building orientation on mechanical properties and microstructure of PEEK and PEI printed by 3D-FDM. Polym Test. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.polymertesting.2019.10594810.1016/j.polymertesting.2019.105948 ↗
26. Arif MF, Kumar S, Varadarajan KM, Cantwell WJ (2018) Performance of biocompatible PEEK processed by fused deposition additive manufacturing. Mater Des 146:249–259. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.matdes.2018.03.01510.1016/j.matdes.2018.03.015 ↗
27. Jiang S, Liao G, Xu D, Liu F, Li W, Cheng Y, Li Z, Xu G (2018) Mechanical properties analysis of polyetherimide parts fabricated by fused deposition modeling. High Perform Polym 31:97–106. https://doi.org/10.1177/095400831775282210.1177/0954008317752822 ↗
28. El Magri A, El Mabrouk K, Vaudreuil S, Ebn Touhami M (2019) Mechanical properties of CF-reinforced PLA parts manufactured by fused deposition modeling. J Thermoplast Compos Mater. https://doi.org/10.1177/089270571984724410.1177/0892705719847244 ↗
29. Gebisa AW, Lemu HG (2018) Investigating effects of Fused-deposition modeling (FDM) processing parameters on flexural properties of ULTEM 9085 using designed experiment. Materials. https://doi.org/10.3390/ma1104050010.3390/ma11040500 ↗
30. LeGrand DG (2011) Annealing. Encyclopedia of polymer science and technology. Wiley, Hoboken. https://doi.org/10.1002/0471440264.pst53410.1002/0471440264.pst534 ↗
31. Cicala G, Giordano D, Tosto C, Filippone G, Recca A, Blanco I (2018) Polylactide (PLA) filaments a biobased solution for additive manufacturing: correlating rheology and thermomechanical properties with printing quality. Materials 11:1–13. https://doi.org/10.3390/ma1107119110.3390/ma11071191 ↗
32. Andjelić S, Scogna RC (2015) Polymer crystallization rate challenges: the art of chemistry and processing. J Appl Polym Sci. https://doi.org/10.1002/app.4206610.1002/app.42066 ↗
33. Ivey M, Melenka GW, Carey JP, Ayranci C (2017) Characterizing short-fiber-reinforced composites produced using additive manufacturing. Adv Manuf Polym Compos Sci. https://doi.org/10.1080/20550340.2017.134112510.1080/20550340.2017.1341125 ↗
34. Wach RA, Wolszczak P, Adamus-Wlodarczyk A (2018) Enhancement of mechanical properties of FDM-PLA parts via thermal annealing. Macromol Mater Eng. https://doi.org/10.1002/mame.20180016910.1002/mame.201800169 ↗
35. Fitzharris ER, Watt I, Rosen DW, Shofner ML (2018) Interlayer bonding improvement of material extrusion parts with polyphenylene sulfide using the Taguchi method. Addit Manuf 24:287–297. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.addma.2018.10.00310.1016/j.addma.2018.10.003 ↗
36. El Magri A, El Mabrouk K, Vaudreuil S, Ebn Touhami M (2020) Experimental investigation and optimization of printing parameters of printed polyphenylene sulfide through response surface methodology. J Appl Polym Sci. https://doi.org/10.1002/app.4962510.1002/app.49625 ↗
37. Kumar S, Mishra RK, Nandi T (2017) Experimental and theoretical investigations of the high performance blends of PEEK/PEI. J Polym Eng 38:351–361. https://doi.org/10.1515/polyeng-2017-000210.1515/polyeng-2017-0002 ↗
38. Hsiao BS, Sauer BB (1993) Glass transition, crystallization, and morphology relationships in miscible poly(aryl ether ketones) and poly(ether imide) blends. J Polym Sci Part B Polym Phys 31:901–915. https://doi.org/10.1002/polb.1993.09031080110.1002/polb.1993.090310801 ↗
39. Chen H, Porter RS (1993) Melting Behavior of poly ( ether ether ketone ) in its blends with poly ( ether imide ). Polym Sci Part B 31:1845–1850. https://doi.org/10.1002/polb.1993.09031121710.1002/polb.1993.090311217 ↗
40. Ramani R, Alam S (2010) Composition optimization of PEEK/PEI blend using model-free kinetics analysis. Thermochim Acta 511:179–188. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tca.2010.08.01210.1016/j.tca.2010.08.012 ↗
41. Dominguez S, Derail C, Leonardi F, Pascal J, Brulé B (2014) Study of the Thermal properties of miscible blends between poly(ether ketone Ketone) (Pekk) and polyimide. Eur Polym J 62:179–185. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eurpolymj.2014.10.02410.1016/j.eurpolymj.2014.10.024 ↗
42. Harris JE, Robeson LM (1988) Miscible blends of poly(aryl ether ketone)s and polyetherimides. J Appl Polym Sci 35:1877–1891. https://doi.org/10.1002/app.1988.07035071310.1002/app.1988.070350713 ↗
43. Shibata M, Fang Z, Yosomiya R (2001) Miscibility and crystallization behavior of poly(ether ether ketone ketone)/poly(ether imide) blends. J Appl Polym Sci 80:769–775. https://doi.org/10.1002/1097-4628(20010502)80:5%3c769::AID-APP1153%3e3.0.CO;2-B10.1002/1097-4628(20010502)80:5<769::AID-APP1153>3.0.CO;2-B ↗
44. Senatov FS, Niaza KV, Zadorozhnyy MY, Maksimkin AV, Kaloshkin SD, Estrin YZ (2016) Mechanical properties and shape memory effect of 3D-printed PLA-based porous scaffolds. J Mech Behav Biomed Mater 57:139–148. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.JMBBM.2015.11.03610.1016/J.JMBBM.2015.11.036 ↗
45. Blundell DJ, Osborn BN (1983) The morphology of poly(aryl-ether-ether-ketone). Polymer 24:953–958. https://doi.org/10.1016/0032-3861(83)90144-110.1016/0032-3861(83)90144-1 ↗
46. Chen J, Guo Q, Zhao Z, Wang X, Duan C (2012) Structures and mechanical properties of PEEK/PEI/PES plastics alloys blent by extrusion molding used for cable insulating jacketing. Proc Eng 36:96–104. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.proeng.2012.03.01610.1016/j.proeng.2012.03.016 ↗
47. Diez-Pascual AM, Martínez G, Gómez MA (2009) Synthesis and characterization of poly(ether ether ketone) derivatives obtained by carbonyl reduction. Macromolecules 42:6885–6892. https://doi.org/10.1021/ma901208e10.1021/ma901208e ↗
48. Nguyen HX, Ishida H (1986) Molecular analysis of the melting behaviour of poly(aryl ether ether ketone. Polymer 27:1400–1405. https://doi.org/10.1016/0032-3861(86)90041-810.1016/0032-3861(86)90041-8 ↗
49. Yasin S, Shakeel A, Ahmad M, Ahmad K, Iqbal K (2019) Physico-chemical analysis of semi-crystalline PEEK in aliphatic and aromatic solvents. Soft Mater 17:143–149. https://doi.org/10.1080/1539445X.2019.157262210.1080/1539445X.2019.1572622 ↗
50. Chen BK, Su CT, Tseng MC, Tsay SY (2006) Preparation of polyetherimide nanocomposites with improved thermal, mechanical and dielectric properties. Polym Bull 57:671–681. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00289-006-0630-310.1007/s00289-006-0630-3 ↗
51. Farong H, Xueqiu W, Shijin L (1987) The thermal stability of polyetherimide. Polym Degrad Stab 18:247–259. https://doi.org/10.1016/0141-3910(87)90005-X10.1016/0141-3910(87)90005-X ↗
52. Díez-Pascual AM, Díez-Vicente AL (2015) Nano-TiO2 reinforced PEEK/PEI blends as biomaterials for load-bearing implant applications. ACS Appl Mater Interfaces 7:5561–5573. https://doi.org/10.1021/acsami.5b0021010.1021/acsami.5b00210 ↗
53. Magri EL, A, Vaudreuil S, EL Mabrouk K, Ebn Touhami M, (2020) Printing temperature effects on the structural and mechanical performances of 3D printed Poly-(phenylene sulfide) material. IOP Conf Ser Mater Sci Eng. https://doi.org/10.1088/1757-899X/783/1/01200110.1088/1757-899X/783/1/012001 ↗
54. Vanaei HR, Shirinbayan M, Costa SF, Duarte FM, Covas JA, Deligant M, Khelladi S, Tcharkhtchi A (2021) Experimental study of PLA thermal behavior during fused filament fabrication. J Appl Polym Sci. https://doi.org/10.1002/app.4974710.1002/app.49747 ↗
55. Vanaei HR, Deligant M, Shirinbayan M, Raissi K, Fitoussi J, Khelladi S, Tcharkhtchi A (2020) A comparative in-process monitoring of temperature profile in fused filament fabrication. Polym Eng Sci. https://doi.org/10.1002/pen.2555510.1002/pen.25555 ↗
56. Geng P, Zhao J, Wu W, Ye W, Wang Y, Wang S, Zhang S (2019) Effects of extrusion speed and printing speed on the 3D printing stability of extruded PEEK filament. J Manuf Process 37:266–273. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jmapro.2018.11.02310.1016/j.jmapro.2018.11.023 ↗
57. Vanaei HR, Shirinbayan M, Vanaei S, Fitoussi J, Khelladi S, Tcharkhtchi A (2021) Multi-scale damage analysis and fatigue behavior of PLA manufactured by fused deposition modeling (FDM). Rapid Prototyp J. https://doi.org/10.1108/RPJ-11-2019-030010.1108/RPJ-11-2019-0300 ↗
58. Yuan M, Galloway JA, Hoffman RJ, Bhatt S (2011) Influence of molecular weight on rheological, thermal, and mechanical properties of PEEK. Polym Eng Sci 51:94–102. https://doi.org/10.1002/pen.2178510.1002/pen.21785 ↗
59. Casavola C, Cazzato A, Moramarco V, Pappalettere C (2016) Orthotropic mechanical properties of fused deposition modelling parts described by classical laminate theory. Mater Des 90:453–458. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.matdes.2015.11.00910.1016/j.matdes.2015.11.009 ↗
60. Jenkins MJ (2001) Crystallisation in miscible blends of PEEK and PEI. Polymer 42:1981–1986. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0032-3861(00)00438-910.1016/S0032-3861(00)00438-9 ↗
61. Wang P, Zou B, Xiao H, Ding S, Huang C (2019) Effects of printing parameters of fused deposition modeling on mechanical properties, surface quality, and microstructure of PEEK. J Mater Process Technol 271:62–74. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.JMATPROTEC.2019.03.01610.1016/J.JMATPROTEC.2019.03.016 ↗
62. Sood AK, Ohdar RK, Mahapatra SS (2010) Parametric appraisal of fused deposition modelling process using the grey Taguchi method. Proc Inst Mech Eng Part B J Eng Manuf 224:135–145.https://doi.org/10.1243/09544054JEM156510.1243/09544054JEM1565 ↗
63. Gomez-Gras G, Jerez-Mesa R, Travieso-Rodriguez JA, Lluma-Fuentes J (2018) Fatigue performance of fused filament fabrication PLA specimens. Mater Des 140:278–285. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.matdes.2017.11.07210.1016/j.matdes.2017.11.072 ↗
64. Sood AK, Ohdar RK, Mahapatra SS (2012) Experimental investigation and empirical modelling of FDM process for compressive strength improvement. J Adv Res 3:81–90. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jare.2011.05.00110.1016/j.jare.2011.05.001 ↗
65. Alizadeh A, Richardson L, Xu J, McCartney S, Marand H, Cheung YW, Chum S (1999) Influence of structural and topological constraints on the crystallization and melting behavior of polymers. 1. Ethylene/1-octene copolymers. Macromolecules 32:6221–6235. https://doi.org/10.1021/MA990669U10.1021/MA990669U ↗
66. Shieh YT, Lin PY, Chen T, Kuo SW (2016) Temperature-, pH- and CO2-sensitive poly(N-isopropylacryl amide-co-acrylic acid) copolymers with high glass transition temperatures. Polymers. https://doi.org/10.3390/polym812043410.3390/polym8120434 ↗
67. Lee Y, Porter RS (1987) Double-Melting Behavior of Poly(ether ether ketone). Macromolecules 20:1336–1341. https://doi.org/10.1021/ma00172a02810.1021/ma00172a028 ↗
68. Gardea F, Lagoudas DC, Naraghi M (2016) An experimental study into active damping mechanisms in CNT nanocomposite. In: 57th AIAA/ASCE/AHS/ASC structures, structural dynamics, and materials conference. https://doi.org/10.2514/6.2016-141810.2514/6.2016-1418 ↗
69. Rafie M, Marsilla KK, Hamid Z, Rusli A, Abdullah M (2019) Enhanced mechanical properties of plasticized polylactic acid filament for fused deposition modelling: effect of in situ heat treatment. Prog Rubber, Plast Recycl Technol 36:131–142. https://doi.org/10.1177/147776061989501810.1177/1477760619895018 ↗