journal article·2004-01

Effects of deformation on hydrogen degradation in a duplex stainless steel

S. S. Chen, T. I. Wu, J. K. Wu

Journal of Materials Science· Volume 39· Issue 1
Publisher page

Abstract

Hydrogen embrittlement of annealed, 20 and 40% cold worked 2205 duplex stainless steels has been evaluated using electrochemical permeation measurement, hydrogen microprint technique and tensile test in this study. Due to hydrogen transport in 2205 duplex stainless steel is mainly lattice diffusion in ferritic phase, more hydrogen distribution, higher permeation rate and effective diffusion in ferritic phase were detected. Hydrogen trapping and mechanical property effects were studied for cold worked specimens. Fractographic investigation revealed that hydrogen absorption promoted transgranular fracture in cold worked specimens. These results exhibits that the cold worked duplex stainless steels are more susceptible to hydrogen embrittlement.
Source: openaire · Quality: candidate unverified · Source record ↗

Research context

OpenAlex topics: Hydrogen embrittlement and corrosion behaviors in metals · Corrosion Behavior and Inhibition · Nuclear Materials and Properties

SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.

References (21)

Show source-provided references
1. R. B. Hutchings, A. Turnbull and A. T. May, Scr. Metall. Mater. 25 (1991) 2657.10.1016/0956-716X(91)90134-M ↗
2. A. Turnbull and A. J. Griffiths, British Corros. J. 31 (1996) 39.10.1179/bcj.1996.31.1.39 ↗
3. A. A. El-Yazgi and D. Hardie, Corros. Sci. 40 (1998) 909.10.1016/S0010-938X(98)00022-5 ↗
4. W. Y. Wei, C. H. Tzeng and J. K. Wu, J. Mater. Sci. Lett. 9 (1990) 1357.10.1007/BF00726545 ↗
5. H. L. Eschbach, F. Gross and S. Schulien, Vacuum 13 (1963) 543.10.1016/0042-207X(63)90541-4 ↗
6. S. L. Chou and W. T. Tsai, Mater. Sci. Eng. A 270 (1999) 219.10.1016/S0921-5093(99)00174-4 ↗
7. R. D. Mccright, Ph.D. Thesis, The Ohio State University, Columbus, OH, 1971.
8. J. Crank, “The Mathematics of Diffusion” (Oxford University Press, 1977) p. 44.
9. W. C. Luu and J. K. Wu, Mater. Lett. 24 (1995) 175.10.1016/0167-577X(95)00068-2 ↗
10. W. C. Luu and J. K. Wu, Corros. Sci. 38 (1996) 239.10.1016/0010-938X(96)00109-6 ↗
11. W. C. Luu, P. W. Liu and J. K. Wu, ibid. 44 (2002) 1783.10.1016/S0010-938X(01)00143-3 ↗
12. J. Overjero-Garcia, J. Mater. Sci. 20 (1985) 2623.10.1007/BF00556094 ↗
13. C. H. Tzeng, W. Y. Wei and J. K. Wu, Mater. Sci. Technol. 5 (1989) 1236.10.1179/mst.1989.5.12.1236 ↗
14. T. P. Perng and C. J. Altstetter, Acta Metall. 34 (1986) 1771.10.1016/0001-6160(86)90123-9 ↗
15. T. P. Perng and C. J. Altstetter, Acta Metall. 35 (1988) 1251.10.1016/0001-6160(88)90277-5 ↗
16. T. P. Perng and C. J. Altstetter, Metall. Trans. 19A (1988) 145.10.1007/BF02669823 ↗
17. S. X. Xie and J. P. Hirth, Corrosion—NACE 38 (1982) 486.10.5006/1.3577364 ↗
18. A. J. Kumnick and H. H. Johnson, Metall. Trans. 5 (1974) 1199.10.1007/BF02644334 ↗
19. S. M. Lee and J. Y. Lee, ibid. 17A (1986) 181.10.1007/BF02643893 ↗
20. G. S. Frankel and R. M. Latanision, Metall. Trans. 17 (1986) 861.10.1007/BF02643862 ↗
21. W. Zheng and D. Hardie, Corrosion. 47 (1991) 792.10.5006/1.3585190 ↗