Kinetics of fly ash geopolymerization
Source abstract
Abstract
Based on the wet chemical analysis, we measured and modeled the kinetics of reactions between fly ash and KOH at various temperatures and water-to-solid mass ratios (W/S). We find that three consecutive rate-limiting processes control reaction progress: (1) dissolution or alteration of the glass phase in the fly ash, (2) classical Fick diffusion through a surface layer, and (3) diffusive transport through a more complex gel structure (interstitial gel). This sequence of processes is independent of W/S (0.35–40), temperature (22–75 °C), and KOH concentration (5–10 M). The relative contribution of each process to the overall reaction progress changes with experimental conditions. Only if and when the third process is rate limiting, a fly ash geopolymer forms and develops mechanical strength (sufficiently low W/S ratio provided). The rate of reaction progress decreases significantly, due to slow transport of reacting species to the surface of the glass particles.
Source: openaire · Quality: candidate unverified · Source record ↗
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Concrete and Cement Materials Research · Recycling and utilization of industrial and municipal waste in materials production · Thermal and Kinetic Analysis
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
References (23)
Show source-provided references
1. Chen C, Gong WL, Lutze W, Pegg IL, Zhai JP (2010) J Mater Sci. doi: 10.1007/s10853-010-4997-z10.1007/s10853-010-4997-z ↗
2. Provis JL, Duxon P, van Deventer JSJ, Lukey GC (2005) Chem Eng Res Des 83:85310.1205/cherd.04329 ↗
3. Provis JL, van Deventer JSJ (2007) Chem Eng Sci 62:230910.1016/j.ces.2007.01.027 ↗
4. Jander G (1927) Zeitschrift Anorg Allgem Chem 163:110.1002/zaac.19271630102 ↗
5. Kondo R, Lee K, Diamon M (1976) J Ceram Soc (Jpn) 84:573
6. Khawam A, Flanagan DR (2006) J Phys Chem 110:1731510.1021/jp062746a ↗
7. Villar-Cociña E, Frías M, Valencia-Morales E, Sánches de Rojas MI (2010) Adv Cem Res 18:1710.1680/adcr.2006.18.1.17 ↗
8. Ginstling AM, Brounshtein BI (1950) J Appl Chem USSR 23:1327
9. Crank J (1975) The mathematics of diffusion, chap 6, 2nd edn. Clarendon Press, Oxford, p 89
10. Shi CJ, Day RL (2000) Cem Concr Res 30:5110.1016/S0008-8846(99)00205-7 ↗
11. Shi CJ, Day RL (2000) Cem Concr Res 30:60710.1016/S0008-8846(00)00214-3 ↗
12. Dabic P, Krstulovic R, Rusic D (2000) Cem Concr Res 30:101710.1016/S0008-8846(00)00293-3 ↗
13. Krstulovic R, Dabic P (2000) Cem Concr Res 30:69310.1016/S0008-8846(00)00231-3 ↗
14. Cabrera J, Rojas MF (2001) Cem Concr Res 31:17710.1016/S0008-8846(00)00456-7 ↗
15. Skavara F, Kopecky L, Nemecek J, Bittnar Z (2006) Ceram Silikaty 50(4):208
16. Fernández-Jiménez A, Palomo A, Sobrados I, Sans J (2006) Micropor Mesopor Mater 91:11110.1016/j.micromeso.2005.11.015 ↗
17. Sagoe-Crentsil K, Weng L (2007) J Mater Sci 42:3007. doi: 10.1007/s10853-006-0818-910.1007/s10853-006-0818-9 ↗
18. Weng L, Sagoe-Crentsil K (2007) J Mater Sci 42:2997. doi: 10.1007/s10853-006-0820-210.1007/s10853-006-0820-2 ↗
19. Zaharaki D, Komnitsas K, Perdikatsis V (2010) J Mater Sci 45:2715. doi: 10.1007/s10853-010-4257-210.1007/s10853-010-4257-2 ↗
20. Lloyd R, Provis JL, van Deventer JSJ (2009) J Mater Sci 44:608. doi: 10.1007/s10853-008-3077-010.1007/s10853-008-3077-0 ↗
21. Lloyd R, Provis JL, van Deventer JSJ (2009) J Mater Sci 44:620. doi: 10.1007/s10853-008-3078-z10.1007/s10853-008-3078-z ↗
22. Koga N, Criadi JM (1998) J Am Ceram Soc 81:290110.1111/j.1151-2916.1998.tb02712.x ↗
23. Koga N, Criadi JM (1997) J Therm Anal 49:147710.1007/BF01983706 ↗