Three-dimensional printing of cerium-incorporated mesoporous calcium-silicate scaffolds for bone repair
Source abstract
Abstract
In the study, we developed hierarchical composite scaffolds by 3D printing technique with mesoporous CaSiO3 containing controlled amounts of Ce substitution in Ca–Si system. The scaffolds were porous with 3D interconnected large pores (size ~400 μm) and an overall porosity above 70 %, combined with a relative high compressive strength (~7 MPa). These properties are essential for enhancing bone ingrowth in tissue engineering. The in vitro biological properties of apatite formation, cell proliferation, and differentiation were characterized on CeO2-MCS scaffolds and MCS scaffolds. Results indicated that CeO2-MCS scaffolds induced similar apatite deposition and cell attachment of human bone marrow stromal cells. In addition, CeO2-MCS scaffolds enhanced expression of alkaline phosphatase, osteogenesis genes (bone morphogenetic protein-2, collagen type I), and angiogenesis gene markers (fibroblast growth factor and vascular endothelial growth factor), compared to that for MCS scaffolds. Therefore, the 3D-printed CeO2-MCS scaffolds showed the potential of enhanced osteogenic activity.
Source: openaire · Quality: candidate unverified · Source record ↗
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Bone Tissue Engineering Materials · Dental Implant Techniques and Outcomes · 3D Printing in Biomedical Research
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
References (35)
Show source-provided references
1. Wu CT, Chang J (2012) Mesoporous bioactive glasses: structure characteristics, drug/growth factor delivery and bone regeneration application. Interface Focus 2:292. doi: 10.1098/rsfs.2011.012110.1098/rsfs.2011.0121 ↗
2. Vallet-Regi M, Ruiz-Hernandez E (2011) Bioceramics: from bone regeneration to cancer nanomedicine. Adv Mater 23:5177. doi: 10.1002/adma.20110158610.1002/adma.201101586 ↗
3. Xia W, Chang J (2008) Preparation and the phase transformation behavior of amorphous mesoporous calcium silicate. Microporous Mesoporous Mater 108:345. doi: 10.1016/j.micromeso.2007.04.01310.1016/j.micromeso.2007.04.013 ↗
4. Li X, Shi JL, Zhu YF et al (2007) A template route to the preparation of mesoporous amorphous calcium silicate with high in vitro bone-forming bioactivity. J Biomed Mater Res B 83B:431. doi: 10.1002/Jbm.B.3081310.1002/jbm.b.30813 ↗
5. Fan Y, Huang SS, Jiang JH et al (2011) Luminescent, mesoporous, and bioactive europium-doped calcium silicate (MCS: Eu3 +) as a drug carrier. J Colloid Interface Sci 357:280. doi: 10.1016/j.jcis.2011.01.10910.1016/j.jcis.2011.01.109 ↗
6. Lu BQ, Zhu YJ, Ao HY, Qi C, Chen F (2012) Synthesis and characterization of magnetic iron oxide/calcium silicate mesoporous nanocomposites as a promising vehicle for drug delivery. Acs Appl Mater Interfaces 4:6968. doi: 10.1021/Am3021284
7. Wu CT, Chang J, Fan W (2012) Bioactive mesoporous calcium-silicate nanoparticles with excellent mineralization ability, osteostimulation, drug-delivery and antibacterial properties for filling apex roots of teeth. J Mater Chem 22:16801. doi: 10.1039/C2jm33387b10.1039/c2jm33387b ↗
8. Zhu HL, Wu BW, Feng XX, Chen JY (2011) Preparation and characterization of bioactive mesoporous calcium silicate-silk fibroin composite films. J Biomed Mater Res B 98B:330. doi: 10.1002/Jbm.B.3185610.1002/jbm.b.31856 ↗
9. Wei J, Chen FP, Shin JW et al (2009) Preparation and characterization of bioactive mesoporous wollastonite–Polycaprolactone composite scaffold. Biomaterials 30:1080. doi: 10.1016/j.biomaterials.2008.10.04610.1016/j.biomaterials.2008.10.046 ↗
10. Iimori Y, Kameshima Y, Okada K, Hayashi S (2005) Comparative study of apatite formation on CaSiO3 ceramics in simulated body fluids with different carbonate concentrations. J Mater Sci 16:73. doi: 10.1007/s10856-005-6449-x
11. Zreiqat H, Ramaswamy Y, Wu CT et al (2010) The incorporation of strontium and zinc into a calcium-silicon ceramic for bone tissue engineering. Biomaterials 31:3175. doi: 10.1016/j.biomaterials.2010.01.02410.1016/j.biomaterials.2010.01.024 ↗
12. Zhu YF, Zhu M, He X, Zhang JH, Tao CL (2013) Substitutions of strontium in mesoporous calcium silicate and their physicochemical and biological properties. Acta Biomater 9:6723. doi: 10.1016/j.actbio.2013.01.02110.1016/j.actbio.2013.01.021 ↗
13. Wu CT, Ramaswamy Y, Kwik D, Zreiqat H (2007) The effect of strontium incorporation into CaSiO3 ceramics on their physical and biological properties. Biomaterials 28:3171. doi: 10.1016/j.biomaterials.2007.04.00210.1016/j.biomaterials.2007.04.002 ↗
14. Chen XC, Ou J, Wei Y, Huang ZB, Kang YQ, Yin GF (2010) Effect of MgO contents on the mechanical properties and biological performances of bioceramics in the MgO-CaO-SiO2 system. J Mater Sci 21:1463. doi: 10.1007/s10856-010-4025-5
15. Zhang JC, Liu CL, Li YP et al (2010) Effect of cerium ion on the proliferation, differentiation and mineralization function of primary mouse osteoblasts in vitro. J Rare Earth 28:138. doi: 10.1016/S1002-0721(09)60067-310.1016/S1002-0721(09)60067-3 ↗
16. Leonelli C, Lusvardi G, Malavasi G, Menabue L, Tonelli M (2003) Synthesis and characterization of cerium-doped glasses and in vitro evaluation of bioactivity. J Non-Cryst Solids 316:198. doi: 10.1016/S0022-3093(02)01628-910.1016/S0022-3093(02)01628-9 ↗
17. Salinas AJ, Shruti S, Malavasi G, Menabue L, Vallet-Regi M (2011) Substitutions of cerium, gallium and zinc in ordered mesoporous bioactive glasses. Acta Biomater 7:3452. doi: 10.1016/j.actbio.2011.05.03310.1016/j.actbio.2011.05.033 ↗
18. Shruti S, Salinas AJ, Malavasi G et al (2012) Structural and in vitro study of cerium, gallium and zinc containing sol-gel bioactive glasses. J Mater Chem 22:13698. doi: 10.1039/C2jm31767b10.1039/c2jm31767b ↗
19. Shruti S, Salinas AJ, Lusvardi G, Malavasi G, Menabue L, Vallet-Regi M (2013) Mesoporous bioactive scaffolds prepared with cerium-, gallium- and zinc-containing glasses. Acta Biomater 9:4836. doi: 10.1016/j.actbio.2012.09.02410.1016/j.actbio.2012.09.024 ↗
20. Zhang JH, Zhu YF (2014) Synthesis and characterization of CeO2-incorporated mesoporous calcium-silicate materials. Microporous Mesoporous Mater 197:244. doi: 10.1016/j.micromeso.2014.06.01810.1016/j.micromeso.2014.06.018 ↗
21. Hollister SJ (2005) Porous scaffold design for tissue engineering. Nat Mater 4:518. doi: 10.1038/Nmat142110.1038/nmat1421 ↗
22. Yoo D (2013) New paradigms in hierarchical porous scaffold design for tissue engineering. Mat Sci Eng C 33:1759. doi: 10.1016/j.msec.2012.12.09210.1016/j.msec.2012.12.092 ↗
23. Vallet-Regi M (2010) Evolution of bioceramics within the field of biomaterials. C R Chim 13:174. doi: 10.1016/j.crci.2009.03.00410.1016/j.crci.2009.03.004 ↗
24. Gerhardt LC, Boccaccini AR (2010) Bioactive glass and glass-ceramic scaffolds for bone tissue engineering. Materials 3:3867. doi: 10.3390/Ma307386710.3390/ma3073867 ↗
25. Mourino V, Boccaccini AR (2010) Bone tissue engineering therapeutics: controlled drug delivery in three-dimensional scaffolds. J R Soc Interface 7:209. doi: 10.1098/rsif.2009.037910.1098/rsif.2009.0379 ↗
26. Manzano M, Vallet-Regi M (2010) New developments in ordered mesoporous materials for drug delivery. J Mater Chem 20:5593. doi: 10.1039/B922651f10.1039/b922651f ↗
27. Zhang JH, Zhao SC, Zhu YF et al (2014) Three-dimensional printing of strontium-containing mesoporous bioactive glass scaffolds for bone regeneration. Acta Biomater 10:2269. doi: 10.1016/j.actbio.2014.01.00110.1016/j.actbio.2014.01.001 ↗
28. Rutz AL, Hyland KE, Jakus AE, Burghardt WR, Shah RN (2015) A multimaterial bioink method for 3D printing tunable, cell-compatible hydrogels. Adv Mater 27:1607. doi: 10.1002/adma.20140507610.1002/adma.201405076 ↗
29. Nichol JW, Koshy ST, Bae H, Hwang CM, Yamanlar S, Khademhosseini A (2010) Cell-laden microengineered gelatin methacrylate hydrogels. Biomaterials 31:5536. doi: 10.1016/j.biomaterials.2010.03.06410.1016/j.biomaterials.2010.03.064 ↗
30. Zhao SC, Zhu M, Zhang JH et al (2014) Three dimensionally printed mesoporous bioactive glass and poly(3-hydroxybutyrate-co-3-hydroxyhexanoate) composite scaffolds for bone regeneration. J Mater Chem B 2:6106. doi: 10.1039/C4tb00838c10.1039/C4TB00838C ↗
31. Zhang JH, Zhao SC, Zhu M et al (2014) 3D-printed magnetic Fe3O4/MBG/PCL composite scaffolds with multifunctionality of bone regeneration, local anticancer drug delivery and hyperthermia. J Mater Chem B 2:7583. doi: 10.1039/C4tb01063a10.1039/C4TB01063A ↗
32. Nair LS, Laurencin CT (2007) Biodegradable polymers as biomaterials. Prog Polym Sci 32:762. doi: 10.1016/j.progpolymsci.2007.05.01710.1016/j.progpolymsci.2007.05.017 ↗
33. Matsubara T, Suardita K, Ishii M et al (2005) alveolar bone marrow as a cell source for regenerative medicine: differences between alveolar and iliac bone marrow stromal cells. J Bone Miner Res 20:399. doi: 10.1359/Jbmr.04111710.1359/JBMR.041117 ↗
34. Yun HS, Kim SE, Hyeon YT (2007) Design and preparation of bioactive glasses with hierarchical pore networks. Chem Commun 21:2139–2141. doi: 10.1039/B702103h10.1039/b702103h ↗
35. Wang K (1997) The analogy in chemical and biological behavior between non-essential ions compared with essential ions. South Afr J Chem 50:232