Understanding the cross-linking reactions in highly oxidized graphene/epoxy nanocomposite systems
Source abstract
Abstract
Graphene oxide (GO) was produced using acidic graphite oxidation and dispersed within an epoxy matrix using a solvent-based technique, to give nanocomposites containing up to 2 wt% of GO. Transmission and scanning electron microscopy revealed a fine dispersion of graphitic sheets which alters the nanocomposite’s fractured surface morphology, while Fourier transform infrared spectroscopy revealed an excess of epoxide groups in the system, which are associated with the included GO. These additional moieties react with hardener amine groups and, consequently, displace the reaction stoichiometry away from the optimum. The result of this is a change in the network architecture and, in particular, the introduction of epoxy-terminated branches, which modify the dielectric γ relaxation. During post-curing, hydroxyl groups on the GO surface react with residual epoxide groups through etherification reactions, to give a marked increase in the glass transition temperature. These reactions lead to increased interfacial interactions between the GO and the matrix, which contribute to an increase in tensile performance. In addition, post-curing also reduces the defect content within the GO lattice which, in turn, increases the electrical conductivity, dielectric permittivity and low frequency losses of the system. Associated chemical pathways are proposed.
Source: openalex_inverted_index · Quality: baseline
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Graphene research and applications · Polymer Nanocomposites and Properties · Fiber-reinforced polymer composites
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
References (55)
Show source-provided references
1. Celzard A, Marêché JF, Furdin G (2002) Surface area of compressed expanded graphite. Carbon N Y 40:2713–2718. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0008-6223(02)00183-510.1016/S0008-6223(02)00183-5 ↗
2. Jang BZ, Zhamu A (2008) Processing of nanographene platelets (NGPs) and NGP nanocomposites: a review. J Mater Sci 43:5092–5101. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10853-008-2755-210.1007/s10853-008-2755-2 ↗
3. Kalaitzidou K, Fukushima H, Drzal LT (2007) A new compounding method for exfoliated graphite-polypropylene nanocomposites with enhanced flexural properties and lower percolation threshold. Compos Sci Technol 67:2045–2051. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compscitech.2006.11.01410.1016/j.compscitech.2006.11.014 ↗
4. Novoselov KS, Geim AK, Morozov SV et al (2004) Electric field in atomically thin carbon films. Science 306:666–669. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.110289610.1126/science.1102896 ↗
5. Stankovich S, Dikin DA, Dommett GHB et al (2006) Graphene-based composite materials. Nature 442:282–286. https://doi.org/10.1038/nature0496910.1038/nature04969 ↗
6. Young RJ, Kinloch IA, Gong L, Novoselov KS (2012) The mechanics of graphene nanocomposites: a review. Compos Sci Technol 72:1459–1476. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compscitech.2012.05.00510.1016/j.compscitech.2012.05.005 ↗
7. Potts JR, Dreyer DR, Bielawski CW, Ruoff RS (2011) Graphene-based polymer nanocomposites. Polym (Guildf) 52:5–25. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.polymer.2010.11.04210.1016/j.polymer.2010.11.042 ↗
8. Atif R, Shyha I, Inam F (2016) Mechanical, thermal, and electrical properties of graphene-epoxy nanocomposites—a review. Polym (Basel). https://doi.org/10.3390/polym808028110.3390/polym8080281 ↗
9. Bhattacharya M (2016) Polymer nanocomposites—a comparison between carbon nanotubes, graphene, and clay as nanofillers. Mater (Basel). 9:1–35
10. Pei S, Cheng H-M (2012) The reduction of graphene oxide. Carbon N Y 50:3210–3228. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.carbon.2011.11.01010.1016/j.carbon.2011.11.010 ↗
11. Stankovich S, Dikin DA, Piner RD et al (2007) Synthesis of graphene-based nanosheets via chemical reduction of exfoliated graphite oxide. Carbon N Y 45:1558–1565. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.carbon.2007.02.03410.1016/j.carbon.2007.02.034 ↗
12. Brodie BC (1859) On the atomic weight of graphite. Philos Trans R Soc Lond 149:249–259. https://doi.org/10.1098/rstl.1859.001310.1098/rstl.1859.0013 ↗
13. Staudenmaier L (1898) Verfahren zur darstellung der graphitsäure. Berichte der Dtsch Chem Gesellschaft 31:1481–1487. https://doi.org/10.1002/cber.1898031023710.1002/cber.18980310237 ↗
14. Hummers WS, Offeman RE (1958) Preparation of graphitic oxide. J Am Chem Soc 80:133910.1021/ja01539a017 ↗
15. Kosynkin DV, Higginbotham AL, Sinitskii A et al (2009) Longitudinal unzipping of carbon nanotubes to form graphene nanoribbons. Nature 458:872–876. https://doi.org/10.1038/nature0787210.1038/nature07872 ↗
16. Higginbotham AL, Kosynkin DV, Sinitskii A et al (2010) Lower-defect graphene oxide nanoribbons from multiwalled carbon nanotubes. ACS Nano 4:2059–2069. https://doi.org/10.1021/nn100118m10.1021/nn100118m ↗
17. Chen J, Yao B, Li C, Shi G (2013) An improved hummers method for eco-friendly synthesis of graphene oxide. Carbon N Y 64:225–229. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.carbon.2013.07.05510.1016/j.carbon.2013.07.055 ↗
18. Marcano DC, Kosynkin DV, Berlin JM et al (2010) Improved synthesis of graphene oxide. ACS Nano 4:4806–4814. https://doi.org/10.1021/nn100636810.1021/nn1006368 ↗
19. Krishnamoorthy K, Veerapandian M, Yun K, Kim SJ (2013) The chemical and structural analysis of graphene oxide with different degrees of oxidation. Carbon N Y 53:38–49. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.carbon.2012.10.01310.1016/j.carbon.2012.10.013 ↗
20. Li Z, Young RJ, Wang R et al (2013) The role of functional groups on graphene oxide in epoxy nanocomposites. Polym (Guildf) 54:5821–5829. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.polymer.2013.08.02610.1016/j.polymer.2013.08.026 ↗
21. Wan Y, Tang L, Gong L et al (2013) Grafting of epoxy chains onto graphene oxide for epoxy composites with improved mechanical and thermal properties. Carbon N Y 69:467–480. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.carbon.2013.12.05010.1016/j.carbon.2013.12.050 ↗
22. Wang X, Jin J, Song M (2013) An investigation of the mechanism of graphene toughening epoxy. Carbon N Y 65:324–333. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.carbon.2013.08.03210.1016/j.carbon.2013.08.032 ↗
23. Park YT, Qian Y, Chan C et al (2015) Epoxy toughening with low graphene loading. Adv Funct Mater 25:575–585. https://doi.org/10.1002/adfm.20140255310.1002/adfm.201402553 ↗
24. Silva LCO, Silva GG, Ajayan PM, Soares BG (2015) Long-term behavior of epoxy/graphene-based composites determined by dynamic mechanical analysis. J Mater Sci 50:6407–6419. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10853-015-9193-810.1007/s10853-015-9193-8 ↗
25. Bao C, Guo Y, Song L et al (2011) In situ preparation of functionalized graphene oxide/epoxy nanocomposites with effective reinforcements. J Mater Chem 21:13290–13298. https://doi.org/10.1039/c1jm11434d10.1039/c1jm11434d ↗
26. Galpaya D, Wang M, Yan C et al (2013) Fabrication and characterisation of graphene oxide-epoxy nanocomposite. In: Fourth international conference on smart materials and nanotechnology in engineering, p 879310.1117/12.2026759 ↗
27. Tang X, Zhou Y, Peng M (2016) Green preparation of epoxy/graphene oxide nanocomposites using a glycidylamine epoxy resin as the surface modifier and phase transfer agent of graphene oxide. ACS Appl Mater Interfaces 8:1854–1866. https://doi.org/10.1021/acsami.5b0983010.1021/acsami.5b09830 ↗
28. Zhou T, Nagao S, Sugahara T et al (2015) Facile identification of the critical content of multi-layer graphene oxide for epoxy composite with optimal thermal properties. RSC Adv 5:20376–20385. https://doi.org/10.1039/c4ra15881d10.1039/c4ra15881d ↗
29. Wang R, Zhuo D, Weng Z et al (2015) A novel nanosilica/graphene oxide hybrid and its flame retarding epoxy resin with simultaneously improved mechanical, thermal conductivity, and dielectric properties. J Mater Chem A 3:9826–9836. https://doi.org/10.1039/c5ta00722d10.1039/c5ta00722d ↗
30. Mancinelli P, Heid TF, Fabiani D et al (2013) Thermal in situ reduction of graphene oxide in epoxy-based nanodielectrics: influence on dielectric properties. In: Annual report—conference on electrical insulation and dielectric phenomena, CEIDP, pp 768–77110.1109/CEIDP.2013.6748226 ↗
31. Mancinelli P, Fabiani D, Saccani A et al (2013) Preparation and dielectric behavior of epoxy resin containing graphene oxide. In: Proceedings of IEEE international conference on solid dielectrics, ICSD, pp 915–91810.1109/ICSD.2013.6619697 ↗
32. Mancinelli P, Heid TF, Fabiani D et al (2013) Electrical conductivity of graphene-based epoxy nanodielectrics. In: Annual report—conference electrical insulation dielectric phenomena, CEIDP, pp 772–775. https://doi.org/10.1109/ceidp.2013.674828210.1109/ceidp.2013.6748282 ↗
33. Paredes JI, Villar-Rodil S, Martínez-Alonso A, Tascón JMD (2008) Graphene oxide dispersions in organic solvents. Langmuir 24:10560–10564. https://doi.org/10.1021/la801744a10.1021/la801744a ↗
34. Vryonis O, Andritsch T, Vaughan AS, Lewin PL (2017) On the effect of solvent method processing on epoxy resin systems: a molecular dynamics study. In: 2017 IEEE conference on electrical insulation and dielectric phenomenon (CEIDP). IEEE, pp 509–51210.1109/CEIDP.2017.8257525 ↗
35. Menczel JD, Bair HE, Reading M et al (2009) Differential scanning calorimetry (DSC). In: Menczel JD, Prime RB (eds) Thermal analysis of polymers: fundamentals and applications. Wiley, New York, pp 7–23910.1002/9780470423837.ch2 ↗
36. Virtanen S, Vaughan AS, Yang S et al (2017) Electrical conductivity and moisture uptake studies of low density polyethylene octylnanosilica composite. In: Proceedings of the Nordic insulation symposium. https://doi.org/10.5324/nordis.v0i25.236810.5324/nordis.v0i25.2368 ↗
37. Geyer RG (1990) Suitable dielectric reference materials. In: Lyons JW (ed) Dielectric characterization and reference materials. Technical Note-1338. NIST Publications, Gaithersburg, MD, pp 85–94
38. Sharmila TKB, Nair AB, Abraham BT et al (2014) Microwave exfoliated reduced graphene oxide epoxy nanocomposites for high performance applications. Polym (Guildf) 55:3614–3627. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.polymer.2014.05.03210.1016/j.polymer.2014.05.032 ↗
39. Esmaeili A, Entezari MH (2014) Facile and fast synthesis of graphene oxide nanosheets via bath ultrasonic irradiation. J Colloid Interface Sci 432:19–25. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcis.2014.06.05510.1016/j.jcis.2014.06.055 ↗
40. Vassilikou-Dova A, Kalogeras IM (2008) Dielectric analysis (DEA). Thermal analysis of polymers: fundamentals and applications. Wiley, New York, pp 497–613
41. Nakka JS, Jansen KMB, Ernst LJ (2013) Tailoring the viscoelasticity of epoxy thermosets. J Appl Polym Sci 128:3794–3806. https://doi.org/10.1002/app.3843510.1002/app.38435 ↗
42. Gillham JK (1986) Formation and properties of thermosetting and high Tg polymeric materials. Polym Eng Sci 26:1429–1433. https://doi.org/10.1002/pen.76026201210.1002/pen.760262012 ↗
43. González-González M, Cabanelas JC, Baselga J (2012) Applications of FTIR on epoxy resins—identification, monitoring the curing process, phase separation and water uptake. In: Theophanides TM (ed) Infrared spectroscopy—materials science, engineering and technology. InTech, London, pp 261–284
44. Nikolic G, Zlatkovic S, Cakic M et al (2010) Fast fourier transform IR characterization of epoxy GY systems crosslinked with aliphatic and cycloaliphatic EH polyamine adducts. Sensors 10:684–696. https://doi.org/10.3390/s10010068410.3390/s100100684 ↗
45. Chike KE, Myrick ML, Lyon RE, Angel SM (1993) Raman and near-infrared studies of an epoxy resin. Appl Spectrosc 47:1631–1635. https://doi.org/10.1366/000370293433471410.1366/0003702934334714 ↗
46. Fothergill JC (2010) Electrical Properties. Dielectric polymer nanocomposites. Springer, Troy, NY, USA, pp 197–22810.1007/978-1-4419-1591-7_7 ↗
47. Vryonis O, Anastassopoulos DL, Vradis AA, Psarras GC (2016) Dielectric response and molecular dynamics in epoxy-BaSrTiO3 nanocomposites: effect of nanofiller loading. Polym (Guildf) 95:82–90. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.polymer.2016.04.05010.1016/j.polymer.2016.04.050 ↗
48. Singha S, Thomas M (2008) Dielectric properties of epoxy nanocomposites. IEEE Trans Dielectr Electr Insul 15:12–23. https://doi.org/10.1109/T-DEI.2008.444673210.1109/T-DEI.2008.4446732 ↗
49. Gonon P, Boudefel A (2006) Electrical properties of epoxy/silver nanocomposites. J Appl Phys 99:2. https://doi.org/10.1063/1.216397810.1063/1.2163978 ↗
50. Psarras GC (2010) Conductivity and dielectric characterization of polymer nanocomposites. Polymer nanocomposites: physical properties and applications. Woodhead Publishing Limited, Cambridge, pp 31–6910.1533/9780857090249.1.31 ↗
51. Kremer F, Schönhals A (2003) Molecular and Collective Dynamics of (Polymeric) Liquid Crystals. Broadband dielectric spectroscopy. Springer, Berlin, pp 385–43210.1007/978-3-642-56120-7_10 ↗
52. Schönhals A (2003) Molecular dynamics in polymer model systems. Broadband dielectric spectroscopy. Springer, Berlin, pp 225–29310.1007/978-3-642-56120-7_7 ↗
53. Schönhals A, Kremer F (2003) Theory of Dielectric Relaxation. Broadband dielectric spectroscopy. Springer, Berlin, pp 1–33
54. Hsu CH, Hsu MH, Chang KC et al (2014) Physical study of room-temperature-cured epoxy/thermally reduced graphene oxides with various contents of oxygen-containing groups. Polym Int 63:1765–1770. https://doi.org/10.1002/pi.476310.1002/pi.4763 ↗
55. Rafiee MA, Rafiee J, Wang Z et al (2009) Enhanced mechanical properties of nanocomposites at low graphene content. ACS Nano 3:3884–3890. https://doi.org/10.1021/nn901047210.1021/nn9010472 ↗