journal article·2016-06

Stress measurement using area detectors: a theoretical and experimental comparison of different methods in ferritic steel using a portable X-ray apparatus

J. Ramirez-Rico, S.-Y. Lee, J. J. Ling, I. C. Noyan

Journal of Materials Science· Volume 51· Issue 11
Publisher page

Abstract

Using area detectors for stress determination by diffraction methods in a single exposure greatly simplifies the measurement process and permits the design of portable systems without complex sample cradles or moving parts. An additional advantage is the ability to see the entire or a large fraction of the Debye ring and thus determine texture and grain size effects before analysis. The two methods most commonly used to obtain stress from a single Debye ring are the so called cos α and full-ring fitting methods, which employ least-squares procedures to determine the stress from the distortion of a Debye ring by probing a set of scattering vector simultaneously. The widely applied sin2 ψ method, in contrast, requires sample rotations to probe a different subset of scattering vector orientations. In this paper we first present a description of the different methods under the same formalism and using a unified set of coordinates that are suited to area detectors normal to the incident beam, highlighting the similarities and differences between them. We further characterize these methods by means of in-situ measurements in carbon steel tube samples, using a portable detector in reflection geometry. We show that, in the absence of plastic flow, the different methods yield basically the same results and are equivalent. An analysis of possible sources of errors and their impact in the final stress values is also presented.
Source: openaire · Quality: candidate unverified · Source record ↗

Research context

OpenAlex topics: Non-Destructive Testing Techniques · X-ray Diffraction in Crystallography · Microstructure and Mechanical Properties of Steels

SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.

References (26)

Show source-provided references
1. Heindlhofer K (1948) Evaluation of residual stress. McGraw-Hill Book Co., New York
2. Barrett CS (1952) Structure of metals. McGraw-Hill Book Co., New York
3. Taylor A (1961) X-ray metallography. Wiley, New York
4. Homicz RJ (1967) Fundamentals and basic techniques of residual stress measurements with a portable x-ray diffraction unit. Soc Automot Eng Trans 76(s1):912–917
5. James MR, Cohen JB (1978) The measurement of residual stresses by x-ray diffraction techniques. Treatise on materials science and technology, vol 19A. Academic, New York, pp 1–62
6. Gelfi M, Bontempi E, Roberti R, Depero L (2004) X-ray diffraction debye ring analysis for stress measurement (DRAST): a new method to evaluate residual stresses. Acta Mater 52(3):583–58910.1016/j.actamat.2003.09.041 ↗
7. He BB (2011) Two-dimensional X-ray diffraction. Wiley, Hoboken
8. Noyan IC, Cohen JB (1987) Residual stress. Springer, New York10.1007/978-1-4613-9570-6 ↗
9. Hauk V (1997) Structural and residual stress analysis by nondestructive methods: evaluation-application-assessment. Elsevier, Amsterdam
10. Ling J, Lee S-Y (2015) Characterization of a portable x-ray device for residual stress measurements. Adv X-ray Anal 59:153–161
11. Boyce B, Furnish T, Padilla H II, Van Campen D, Mehta A (2015) Detecting rare, abnormally large grains by x-ray diffraction. J Mater Sci 50:6719–6729. doi: 10.1007/s10853-015-9226-310.1007/s10853-015-9226-3 ↗
12. Ramirez-Rico J, Stolzenburg F, Almer J, Routbort J, Singh D, Faber K (2013) In situ imaging and strain determination during fracture in a sic/sic ceramic matrix composite. Scripta Mater 69(7):497–50010.1016/j.scriptamat.2013.05.032 ↗
13. Harder BJ, Ramirez-Rico J, Almer JD, Lee KN, Faber KT (2011) Chemical and mechanical consequences of environmental barrier coating exposure to calcium-magnesium-aluminosilicate. J Am Ceram Soc 94:s178–s18510.1111/j.1551-2916.2011.04448.x ↗
14. Sasaki T, Hirose Y, Sasaki K, Yasukawa S (1997) Influence of image processing conditions of debye Scherrer ring images in x-ray stress measurement using an imaging plate. Adv X-ray Anal 40:588–594
15. Sasaki T, Kobayashi Y (2009) X-ray multiaxial stress analysis using two debye rings. Adv X-ray Anal 52:248–255
16. Sasaki T, Maruyama Y, Ohba H, Ejiri S (2014) Two-dimensional imaging of debye-Scherrer ring for tri-axial stress analysis of industrial materials. J Instrum 9:C0706610.1088/1748-0221/9/07/C07006 ↗
17. Kampfe A, Kampfe B, Goldenbogen S, Eigenmann B, Macherauch E, Lohe D (2000) X-ray stress analysis on polycrystalline materials using two-dimensional detectors. Adv X-ray Anal 43:54–65
18. Behnken H, Hauk V (2001) Determination of steep stress gradients by x-ray diffraction-results of a joint investigation. Mater Sci Eng A 300(1):41–5110.1016/S0921-5093(00)01791-3 ↗
19. Marques M, Dias A, Gergaud P, Lebrun J (2000) A methodology development for the study of near surface stress gradients. Mater Sci Eng A 287(1):78–8610.1016/S0921-5093(00)00819-4 ↗
20. Dolle H (1979) The influence of multiaxial stress states, stress gradients and elastic anisotropy on the evaluation of (residual) stresses by x-rays. J Appl Crystallogr 12(6):489–50110.1107/S0021889879013169 ↗
21. Taira S, Tanaka K, Yamazaki T (1978) A method of x-ray microbeam measurement of local stress and its application to fatigue crack growth problems. J Soc Mater Sci Jpn 27(294):251–25610.2472/jsms.27.251 ↗
22. Chidambarrao D, Song Y, Noyan I (1997) Numerical simulation of the x-ray stress analysis technique in polycrystalline materials under elastic loading. Metall Mater Trans A 28(12):2515–252510.1007/s11661-997-0009-6 ↗
23. Noyan I, Nguyen L (1988) Oscillations in interplanar spacing vs. sin2 $$\psi $$ ψ a fem analysis. Adv X-ray Anal 31:191–204
24. Noyan I, Nguyen L (1989) Effect of plastic deformations on oscillations in $$d$$ d vs. $$\sin ^2\psi $$ sin 2 ψ plots. Adv X-ray Anal 32:355–364
25. Noyan I, Cohen J (1983) Determining stresses in the presence of nonlinearities in interplanar spacing vs. $$\sin ^2\psi $$ sin 2 ψ . Adv X-ray Anal 27:129–148
26. Hounkpati V, Fréour S, Gloaguen D, Legrand V (2014) Influence of morphologic texture on stress analysis by x-ray and neutron diffraction in single-phase metallic materials. J Mater Sci 49(20):7049–7065. doi: 10.1007/s10853-014-8410-110.1007/s10853-014-8410-1 ↗