journal article·2011-04

Nanoscale fracture analysis by atomic force microscopy of EPDM rubber due to high-pressure hydrogen decompression

Junichiro Yamabe, Shin Nishimura

Journal of Materials Science· Volume 46· Issue 7
Publisher page

Abstract

The relationship between internal fracture due to high-pressure hydrogen decompression and microstructure of ethylene–propylene–diene–methylene linkage (EPDM) rubber was investigated by atomic force microscopy (AFM). Nanoscale line-like structures were observed in an unexposed specimen, and their number and length increased with hydrogen exposure. This result implies that the structure of the unfilled EPDM rubber is inhomogeneous at a nanoscale level, and nanoscale fracture caused by the bubbles that are formed from dissolved hydrogen molecules after decompression occurs even though no cracks are observed by optical microscopy. Since this nanoscale fracture occurred at a threshold tearing energy lower than that obtained from static crack growth tests of macroscopic cracks (Ts,th), it is supposed that nanoscale structures that fractured at a lower threshold tearing energy (Tnano,th) than Ts,th existed in the rubber matrix, and these low-strength structures were the origin of the nanoscale fracture. From these results, it is inferred that the fracture of the EPDM rubber by high-pressure hydrogen decompression consists of two fracture processes that differ in terms of size scale, i.e., bubble formation at a submicrometer level and crack initiation at a micrometer level. The hydrogen pressures at bubble formation and crack initiation were also estimated by assuming two threshold tearing energies, Tnano,th for the bubble formation and Ts,th for the crack initiation, in terms of fracture mechanics. As a result, the experimental hydrogen pressures were successfully estimated.
Source: openaire · Quality: candidate unverified · Source record ↗

Research context

OpenAlex topics: Force Microscopy Techniques and Applications · Diamond and Carbon-based Materials Research · Non-Destructive Testing Techniques

SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.

References (20)

Show source-provided references
1. Briscoe BJ, Savvas T, Kelly CT (1994) Rubber Chem Technol 67:38410.5254/1.3538683 ↗
2. Gent AN, Tompkins DA (1969) J Appl Phys 40:252010.1063/1.1658026 ↗
3. Gent AN, Lindley PB (1958) Proc R Soc Lond A 249:19510.1098/rspa.1959.0016 ↗
4. Lindsey CH (1967) J Appl Phys 38:484310.1063/1.1709232 ↗
5. Stevenson A, Glyn M (1995) Rubber Chem Technol 68:19710.5254/1.3538735 ↗
6. Stewart CW (1970) J Polym Sci A 8:93710.1002/pol.1970.160080609 ↗
7. Zakaria S, Briscoe BJ (1990) Chemtech 20:492
8. Ender DH (1986) Chemtech 16:52
9. Briscoe BJ, Liatsis D (1992) Rubber Chem Technol 65:35010.5254/1.3538617 ↗
10. Epstein PS, Plesset MS (1950) J Chem Phys 18:150510.1063/1.1747520 ↗
11. Yamabe J, Nishimura S (2009) Trans J Soc Mech Eng A 75:63310.1299/kikaia.75.633 ↗
12. Yamabe J, Nishimura S (2009) Trans J Soc Mech Eng A 75:172610.1299/kikaia.75.1726 ↗
13. Yamabe J, Nishimura S (2010) In: 18th European conference on fracture, CD-ROM
14. Yamabe J, Nishimura S (2009) In: Proceedings of the 14th symposium on fracture and fracture mechanics, pp 30–34
15. Yamabe J, Nishimura S (2009) Int J Hydrogen Energy 34:197710.1016/j.ijhydene.2008.11.105 ↗
16. Yamabe J, Matsumoto T, Nishimura S (2010) J Soc Mater Sci Jpn 59:95610.2472/jsms.59.956 ↗
17. Thomas AG (1960) J Appl Polym Sci 8:16810.1002/app.1960.070030805 ↗
18. Lake AJ, Lindley PB (1964) J Appl Polym Sci 8:70710.1002/app.1964.070080212 ↗
19. Ikeda Y, Yasuda Y, Hijikata K, Tosaka M, Kohjiya S (2008) Macromolecules 41:587610.1021/ma800144u ↗
20. Dohi H, Sakai M, Nakamae H, Kimura H, Kotani M, Kishimoto H, Minagala Y (2007) Kautsch Gummi Kunstst 01–02:52