Improving printability of a thermoresponsive hydrogel biomaterial ink by nanoclay addition
Source abstract
Abstract
Abstract As a promising biofabrication technology, extrusion-based bioprinting has gained significant attention in the last decade and major advances have been made in the development of bioinks. However, suitable synthetic and stimuli-responsive bioinks are underrepresented in this context. In this work, we described a hybrid system of nanoclay Laponite XLG and thermoresponsive block copolymer poly(2-methyl-2-oxazoline)- b -poly(2- n -propyl-2-oxazine) (PMeOx- b -PnPrOzi) as a novel biomaterial ink and discussed its critical properties relevant for extrusion-based bioprinting, including viscoelastic properties and printability. The hybrid hydrogel retains the thermogelling properties but is strengthened by the added clay (over 5 kPa of storage modulus and 240 Pa of yield stress). Importantly, the shear-thinning character is further enhanced, which, in combination with very rapid viscosity recovery (~ 1 s) and structure recovery (~ 10 s), is highly beneficial for extrusion-based 3D printing. Accordingly, various 3D patterns could be printed with markedly enhanced resolution and shape fidelity compared to the biomaterial ink without added clay. Graphic abstract
Source: crossref · Quality: baseline
Research context
OpenAlex topics: 3D Printing in Biomedical Research · Additive Manufacturing and 3D Printing Technologies · Innovative Microfluidic and Catalytic Techniques Innovation
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
References (60)
Show source-provided references
1. Lee W, Debasitis JC, Lee VK, Lee JH, Fischer K, Edminster K, Park JK, Yoo SS (2009) Multi-layered culture of human skin fibroblasts and keratinocytes through three-dimensional freeform fabrication. Biomaterials 30:1587–159510.1016/j.biomaterials.2008.12.009 ↗
2. Cohen DL, Lo W, Tsavaris A, Peng D, Lipson H, Bonassar LJ (2011) Increased mixing improves hydrogel homogeneity and quality of three-dimensional printed constructs. Tissue Eng Part C Methods 17:239–24810.1089/ten.tec.2010.0093 ↗
3. Rhee S, Puetzer JL, Mason BN, Reinhart-King CA, Bonassar LJ (2016) 3D bioprinting of spatially heterogeneous collagen constructs for cartilage tissue engineering. ACS Biomater Sci Eng 2:1800–180510.1021/acsbiomaterials.6b00288 ↗
4. Cui XF, Breitenkamp K, Finn MG, Lotz M, D'Lima DD (2012) Direct human cartilage repair using three-dimensional bioprinting technology. Tissue Eng Part A 18:1304–131210.1089/ten.tea.2011.0543 ↗
5. Abbadessa A, Mouser VHM, Blokzijl MM, Gawlitta D, Dhert WJA, Hennink WE, Malda J, Vermonden T (2016) A synthetic thermosensitive hydrogel for cartilage bioprinting and its biofunctionalization with polysaccharides. Biomacromolecules 17:2137–214710.1021/acs.biomac.6b00366 ↗
6. You F, Eames BF, Chen X (2017) Application of extrusion-based hydrogel bioprinting for cartilage tissue engineering. Int J Mol Sci 18:159710.3390/ijms18071597 ↗
7. Tang D, Tare RS, Yang LY, Williams DF, Ou KL, Oreffo ROC (2016) Biofabrication of bone tissue: approaches, challenges and translation for bone regeneration. Biomaterials 83:363–38210.1016/j.biomaterials.2016.01.024 ↗
8. Ozbolat IT (2015) Bioprinting scale-up tissue and organ constructs for transplantation. Trends Biotechnol 33:395–40010.1016/j.tibtech.2015.04.005 ↗
9. Wu W, DeConinck A, Lewis JA (2011) Omnidirectional printing of 3D microvascular networks. Adv Mater 23:H178–H18310.1002/adma.201004625 ↗
10. Malda J, Visser J, Melchels FP, Jungst T, Hennink WE, Dhert WJA, Groll J, Hutmacher DW (2013) 25th anniversary article: engineering hydrogels for biofabrication. Adv Mater 25:5011–502810.1002/adma.201302042 ↗
11. Groll J, Boland T, Blunk T, Burdick JA, Cho DW, Dalton PD, Derby B, Forgacs G, Li Q, Mironov VA, Moroni L, Nakamura M, Shu WM, Takeuchi S, Vozzi G, Woodfield TBF, Xu T, Yoo JJ, Malda J (2016) Biofabrication: reappraising the definition of an evolving field. Biofabrication 8:01300110.1088/1758-5090/8/1/013001 ↗
12. Pedde RD, Mirani B, Navaei A, Styan T, Wong S, Mehrali M, Thakur A, Mohtaram NK, Bayati A, Dolatshahi-Pirouz A, Nikkhah M, Willerth SM, Akbari M (2017) Emerging biofabrication strategies for engineering complex tissue constructs. Adv Mater 29:160606110.1002/adma.201606061 ↗
13. Levato R, Visser J, Planell JA, Engel E, Malda J, Mateos-Timoneda MA (2014) Biofabrication of tissue constructs by 3D bioprinting of cell-laden microcarriers. Biofabrication 6:03502010.1088/1758-5082/6/3/035020 ↗
14. Ozbolat IT, Hospodiuk M (2016) Current advances and future perspectives in extrusion-based bioprinting. Biomaterials 76:321–34310.1016/j.biomaterials.2015.10.076 ↗
15. Murphy SV, Atala A (2014) 3D bioprinting of tissues and organs. Nat Biotechnol 32:773–78510.1038/nbt.2958 ↗
16. Placone JK, Engler AJ (2018) Recent advances in extrusion-based 3D printing for biomedical applications. Adv Healthc Mater 7:170116110.1002/adhm.201701161 ↗
17. Groll J, Burdick J, Cho D, Derby B, Gelinsky M, Heilshorn S, Jüngst T, Malda J, Mironov V, Nakayama K (2018) A definition of bioinks and their distinction from biomaterial inks. Biofabrication 11:01300110.1088/1758-5090/aaec52 ↗
18. Jüngst T, Smolan W, Schacht K, Scheibel T, Groll J (2016) Strategies and molecular design criteria for 3D printable hydrogels. Chem Rev 116:1496–153910.1021/acs.chemrev.5b00303 ↗
19. Paxton N, Smolan W, Bock T, Melchels F, Groll J, Jungst T (2017) Proposal to assess printability of bioinks for extrusion-based bioprinting and evaluation of rheological properties governing bioprintability. Biofabrication 9:04410710.1088/1758-5090/aa8dd8 ↗
20. Jia J, Richards DJ, Pollard S, Tan Y, Rodriguez J, Visconti RP, Trusk TC, Yost MJ, Yao H, Markwald RR, Mei Y (2014) Engineering alginate as bioink for bioprinting. Acta Biomater 10:4323–433110.1016/j.actbio.2014.06.034 ↗
21. Cidonio G, Alcala-Orozco CR, Lim KS, Glinka M, Mutreja I, Kim YH, Dawson JI, Woodfield TBF, Oreffo ROC (2019) Osteogenic and angiogenic tissue formation in high fidelity nanocomposite laponite-gelatin bioinks. Biofabrication 11:03502710.1088/1758-5090/ab19fd ↗
22. Ouyang LL, Highley C, Rodell C, Sun W, Burdick J (2016) 3D printing of shear-thinning hyaluronic acid hydrogels with secondary crosslinking. ACS Biomater Sci Eng 2:1743–175110.1021/acsbiomaterials.6b00158 ↗
23. Hockaday LA, Kang KH, Colangelo NW, Cheung PYC, Duan B, Malone E, Wu J, Girardi LN, Bonassar LJ, Lipson H, Chu CC, Butcher JT (2012) Rapid 3D printing of anatomically accurate and mechanically heterogeneous aortic valve hydrogel scaffolds. Biofabrication 4:03500510.1088/1758-5082/4/3/035005 ↗
24. Xu CC, Lee WH, Dai GH, Hong Y (2018) Highly elastic biodegradable single-network hydrogel for cell printing. ACS Appl Mater Interfaces 10:9969–997910.1021/acsami.8b01294 ↗
25. Wu CJ, Schmidt G (2009) Thermosensitive and dissolution properties in nanocomposite polymer hydrogels. Macromol Rapid Commun 30:1492–149710.1002/marc.200900163 ↗
26. Sun KS, Raghavan SR (2010) Thermogelling aqueous fluids containing low concentrations of pluronic F127 and laponite nanoparticles. Langmuir 26:8015–802010.1021/la904907b ↗
27. Chang CW, van Spreeuwel A, Zhang C, Varghese S (2010) PEG/clay nanocomposite hydrogel: a mechanically robust tissue engineering scaffold. Soft Matter 6:5157–516410.1039/c0sm00067a ↗
28. Luo YX, Zhai D, Huan ZG, Zhu HB, Xia LG, Chang J, Wu CT (2015) Three-dimensional printing of hollow-struts-packed bioceramic scaffolds for bone regeneration. ACS Appl Mater Interfaces 7:24377–2438310.1021/acsami.5b08911 ↗
29. Trachsel L, Broguiere N, Rosenboom JG, Zenobi-Wong M, Benetti EM (2018) Enzymatically crosslinked poly(2-alkyl-2-oxazoline) networks for 3D cell culture. J Mater Chem B 6:7568–757210.1039/C8TB02382D ↗
30. Dargaville TR, Park JR, Hoogenboom R (2018) Poly(2-oxazoline) hydrogels: state-of-the-art and emerging applications. Macromol Biosci 18:180007010.1002/mabi.201800070 ↗
31. Luxenhofer R, Han Y, Schulz A, Tong J, He Z, Kabanov AV, Jordan R (2012) Poly(2-oxazoline)s as polymer therapeutics. Macromol Rapid Commun 33:1613–163110.1002/marc.201200354 ↗
32. Lorson T, Lübtow MM, Wegener E, Haider MS, Borova S, Nahm D, Jordan R, Sokolski-Papkov M, Kabanov AV, Luxenhofer R (2018) Poly(2-oxazoline)s based biomaterials: a comprehensive and critical update. Biomaterials 178:204–28010.1016/j.biomaterials.2018.05.022 ↗
33. Hartlieb M, Kempe K, Schubert US (2015) Covalently cross-linked poly(2-oxazoline) materials for biomedical applications-from hydrogels to self-assembled and templated structures. J Mater Chem B 3:526–53810.1039/C4TB01660B ↗
34. Jerca FA, Anghelache AM, Ghibu E, Cecoltan S, Stancu IC, Trusca R, Vasile E, Teodorescu M, Vuluga DM, Hoogenboom R, Jerca VV (2018) Poly(2-isopropenyl-2-oxazoline) hydrogels for biomedical applications. Chem Mater 30:7938–794910.1021/acs.chemmater.8b03545 ↗
35. Zahoranova A, Kronekova Z, Zahoran M, Chorvat D, Janigova I, Kronek J (2016) Poly(2-oxazoline) hydrogels crosslinked with aliphatic bis(2-oxazoline)s: properties, cytotoxicity, and cell cultivation. J Polym Sci Part A Polym Chem 54:1548–155910.1002/pola.28009 ↗
36. Dargaville TR, Forster R, Farrugia BL, Kempe K, Voorhaar L, Schubert US, Hoogenboom R (2012) Poly(2-oxazoline) hydrogel monoliths via thiol-ene coupling. Macromol Rapid Commun 33:1695–170010.1002/marc.201200249 ↗
37. Lorson T, Jaksch S, Lübtow MM, Jüngst T, Groll J, Lühmann T, Luxenhofer R (2017) A thermogelling supramolecular hydrogel with sponge-Like morphology as a cytocompatible bioink. Biomacromolecules 18:2161–217110.1021/acs.biomac.7b00481 ↗
38. Lübtow MM, Mrlik M, Hahn L, Altmann A, Beudert M, Lühmann T, Luxenhofer R (2019) Temperature-dependent rheological and viscoelastic investigation of a poly(2-methyl-2-oxazoline)-b-poly(2-iso-butyl-2-oxazoline)-b-poly(2-methyl-2-oxazoline)-based thermogelling hydrogel. J Funct Biomater 10:3610.3390/jfb10030036 ↗
39. Monnery BD, Hoogenboom R (2019) Thermoresponsive hydrogels formed by poly(2-oxazoline) triblock copolymers. Polym Chem 10:3480–348710.1039/C9PY00300B ↗
40. Chimene D, Kaunas R, Gaharwar AK (2020) Hydrogel bioink reinforcement for additive manufacturing: a focused review of emerging strategies. Adv Mater 32:190202610.1002/adma.201902026 ↗
41. Parak A, Pradeep P, du Toit LC, Kumar P, Choonara YE, Pillay V (2019) Functionalizing bioinks for 3D bioprinting applications. Drug Discov Today 24:198–20510.1016/j.drudis.2018.09.012 ↗
42. Gungor-Ozkerim PS, Inci I, Zhang YS, Khademhosseini A, Dokmeci MR (2018) Bioinks for 3D bioprinting: an overview. Biomater Sci 6:915–94610.1039/C7BM00765E ↗
43. Hong SM, Sycks D, Chan HF, Lin ST, Lopez GP, Guilak F, Leong KW, Zhao XH (2015) 3D printing of highly stretchable and tough hydrogels into complex, cellularized structures. Adv Mater 27:4035–404010.1002/adma.201501099 ↗
44. Mignon A, Pezzoli D, Prouve E, Levesque L, Arslan A, Pien N, Schaubroeck D, Van Hoorick J, Mantovani D, Van Vlierberghe S, Dubruel P (2019) Combined effect of Laponite and polymer molecular weight on the cell-interactive properties of synthetic PEO-based hydrogels. React Funct Polym 136:95–10610.1016/j.reactfunctpolym.2018.12.017 ↗
45. Chimene D, Peak CW, Gentry JL, Carrow JK, Cross LM, Mondragon E, Cardoso GB, Kaunas R, Gaharwar AK (2018) Nanoengineered ionic-covalent entanglement (NICE) bioinks for 3D bioprinting. ACS Appl Mater Interfaces 10:9957–996810.1021/acsami.7b19808 ↗
46. Jin YF, Shen YY, Yin J, Qian J, Huang Y (2018) Nanoclay-based self-supporting responsive nanocomposite hydrogels for printing applications. ACS Appl Mater Interfaces 10:10461–1047010.1021/acsami.8b00806 ↗
47. Murugesan S, Scheibel T (2020) Copolymer/clay nanocomposites for biomedical applications. Adv Funct Mater 30:190810110.1002/adfm.201908101 ↗
48. Gao Q, Niu X (2019) 3D printing of complex GelMA-based scaffolds with nanoclay. Biofabrication 11:03500610.1088/1758-5090/ab0cf6 ↗
49. Ahlfeld T, Cidonio G, Kilian D, Duin S, Akkineni A, Dawson J, Yang S, Lode A, Oreffo R, Gelinsky M (2017) Development of a clay based bioink for 3D cell printing for skeletal application. Biofabrication 9:03410310.1088/1758-5090/aa7e96 ↗
50. Jin Y, Liu C, Chai W, Compaan A, Huang Y (2017) Self-supporting nanoclay as internal scaffold material for direct printing of soft hydrogel composite structures in air. ACS Appl Mater Interfaces 9:17457–17466
51. Wang CH, Hwang YS, Chiang PR, Shen CR, Hong WH, Hsiue GH (2012) Extended release of bevacizumab by thermosensitive biodegradable and biocompatible hydrogel. Biomacromolecules 13:40–4810.1021/bm2009558 ↗
52. Compaan AM, Song K, Huang Y (2019) Gellan fluid gel as a versatile support bath material for fluid extrusion bioprinting. ACS Appl Mater Interfaces 11:5714–572610.1021/acsami.8b13792 ↗
53. Ozbolat V, Dey M, Ayan B, Ozbolat IT (2019) Extrusion-based printing of sacrificial carbopol ink for fabrication of microfluidic devices. Biofabrication 11:03410110.1088/1758-5090/ab10ae ↗
54. Shi Y, Ha H, Al-Sudani A, Ellison CJ, Yu GH (2016) Thermoplastic elastomer-enabled smart electrolyte for thermoresponsive self-protection of electrochemical energy storage devices. Adv Mater 28:7921–792810.1002/adma.201602239 ↗
55. Sinnwell S, Ritter H (2006) Microwave accelerated polymerization of 2-phenyl-5,6-dihydro-4H-1,3-oxazine: kinetics and influence of end-groups on glass transition temperature. Macromol Rapid Commun 27:1335–134010.1002/marc.200600231 ↗
56. Luxenhofer R, Schulz A, Roques C, Li S, Bronich TK, Batrakova EV, Jordan R, Kabanov AV (2010) Doubly amphiphilic poly(2-oxazoline)s as high-capacity delivery systems for hydrophobic drugs. Biomaterials 31:4972–497910.1016/j.biomaterials.2010.02.057 ↗
57. Lorson T (2019) Novel poly(2-oxazoline) based bioinks. Ph.D. thesis Julius-Maximilians-Universität Würzburg
58. Le Coeur C, Lorthioir C, Feoktystov A, Wu B, Volet G, Amiel C (2021) Laponite/poly(2-methyl-2-oxazoline) hydrogels: interplay between local structure and rheological behaviour. J Coll Interface Sci 582:149–15810.1016/j.jcis.2020.07.068 ↗
59. Boucenna I, Royon L, Colinart P (2009) Effect of laponite clay particles on thermal and rheological properties of pluronic triblock copolymer. J Therm Anal Calorim 98:119–12310.1007/s10973-009-0339-2 ↗
60. Gao T, Gillispie GJ, Copus JS, PR AK, Seol Y-J, Atala A, Yoo JJ, Lee SJ, (2018) Optimization of gelatin–alginate composite bioink printability using rheological parameters: a systematic approach. Biofabrication 10:03410610.1088/1758-5090/aacdc7 ↗