Vibration reduction design method of metamaterials with negative Poisson’s ratio
Source abstract
Abstract
This work proposes a topology optimization design method of metamaterials for improving the vibration reduction performance. Firstly, an optimization mathematical model of the functional element is established with the objective of maximizing the origin mechanical impedance level, and the functional element with optimal vibration reduction effect is obtained by the calculation of the mathematical model. Then, the optimized functional elements are periodically arranged to generate the metamaterials, and thus a series of metamaterials with negative Poisson’s ratio ranging from − 0.5 to − 2.0 are designed. Numerical simulation shows that the amplitudes of the acceleration response are reduced by 66.5% after the vibration is passed through the metamaterials. Comparison shows that the novel designed metamaterials achieve at least 12% improvement in vibration reduction performance over the traditional honeycomb.
Source: openaire · Quality: candidate unverified · Source record ↗
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Cellular and Composite Structures · Acoustic Wave Phenomena Research · Railway Engineering and Dynamics
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
References (47)
Show source-provided references
1. Evans KE, Nkansah MA, Hutchinson IJ et al (1991) Molecular network design. Nature 353:124–125. https://doi.org/10.1038/353124a010.1038/353124a0 ↗
2. Saxena KK, Das R, Calius EP (2016) Three decades of auxetics research—materials with negative Poisson’s ratio: a review. Adv Eng Mater 18(11):1847–1870. https://doi.org/10.1002/adem.20160005310.1002/adem.201600053 ↗
3. Kolken HMA, Zadpoor AA (2017) Auxetic mechanical metamaterials. RSC Adv 7(9):5111–5129. https://doi.org/10.1039/C6RA27333E10.1039/C6RA27333E ↗
4. Robbins J, Owen SJ, Clark BW et al (2016) An efficient and scalable approach for generating topologically optimized cellular structures for additive manufacturing. Addit Manuf 12:296–304. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.addma.2016.06.01310.1016/j.addma.2016.06.013 ↗
5. Yang W, Li ZM, Shi W et al (2004) Review on auxetic materials. J Mater Sci 39(10):3269–3279. https://doi.org/10.1023/B:JMSC.00010.1023/B:JMSC.000 ↗
6. Hu LL, Deng H (2015) Indentation resistance of the re-entrant hexagonal honeycombs with negative Poisson’s ratio. Mater Res Innov 19(sup 1):S1-442–S1-445. https://doi.org/10.1179/1432891715Z.000000000158810.1179/1432891715Z.0000000001588 ↗
7. Compton BG, Lewis JA (2014) 3D-printing of lightweight cellular composites. Adv Mater 26(34):5930–5935. https://doi.org/10.1002/adma.20140180410.1002/adma.201401804 ↗
8. Nia AA, Razavi SB, Majzoobi GH (2008) Ballistic limit determination of aluminum honeycombs-experimental study. Mater Sci Eng A 488(1–2):273–280. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.msea.2007.11.04410.1016/j.msea.2007.11.044 ↗
9. Yungwirth CJ, Wadley HNG, O’Connor JH et al (2008) Impact response of sandwich plates with a pyramidal lattice core. Int J Impact Eng 35(8):920–936. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijimpeng.2007.07.00110.1016/j.ijimpeng.2007.07.001 ↗
10. Fleck NA, Deshpande VS, Ashby MF (2010) Micro-architectured materials: past, present and future. Proc Mathem Phys Eng Sci 466(2121):2495–2516. https://doi.org/10.1098/rspa.2010.021510.1098/rspa.2010.0215 ↗
11. Li Dong, Yin Jianhua, Dong Liang et al (2018) Strong re-entrant cellular structures with negative Poisson’s ratio. J Mater Sci 53:3493–3499. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10853-017-1809-810.1007/s10853-017-1809-8 ↗
12. Chekkal I, Remillat C, Scarpa F (2003) Acoustic properties of auxetic foams. High Perform Struct Mater 6:119–129. https://doi.org/10.2495/HPSM12011110.2495/HPSM120111 ↗
13. Boldrin L, Hummel S, Scarpa F et al (2016) Dynamic behaviour of auxetic gradient composite hexagonal honeycombs. Compos Struct 149:114–124. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compstruct.2016.03.04410.1016/j.compstruct.2016.03.044 ↗
14. Scarpa F, Tomlinson G (2000) Theoretical characteristics of the vibration of sandwich plates with in-plane negative Poisson’s ratio values. J Sound Vib 230(1):45–67. https://doi.org/10.1006/jsvi.1999.260010.1006/jsvi.1999.2600 ↗
15. Nguyen DD, Pham CH (2016) Nonlinear dynamic response and vibration of sandwich composite plates with negative Poisson’s ratio in auxetic honeycombs. J Sandwich Struct Mater 20:692–717. https://doi.org/10.1177/109963621667472910.1177/1099636216674729 ↗
16. Duc ND, Kim SE, Cong PH, Anh NT, Khoa ND (2017) Dynamic response and vibration of composite double curved shallow shells with negative Poisson’s ratio in auxetic honeycombs core layer on elastic foundations subjected to blast and damping loads. Int J Mech Sci 133:504–512. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijmecsci.2017.09.00910.1016/j.ijmecsci.2017.09.009 ↗
17. Duc ND, Cong PH (2018) Nonlinear dynamic response and vibration of sandwich composite plates with negative Poisson’s ratio in auxetic honeycombs. J Sandwich Struct Mater 20(6):692–717. https://doi.org/10.1177/109963621667472910.1177/1099636216674729 ↗
18. Yang W, Li ZM, Shi W et al (2004) Review on auxetic materials. J Mater Sci 39(10):3269–3279. https://doi.org/10.1023/B:JMSC.0000026928.93231.e010.1023/B:JMSC.0000026928.93231.e0 ↗
19. Bianchi M, Scarpa F (2013) Vibration transmissibility and damping behaviour for auxetic and conventional foams under linear and nonlinear regimes. Smart Mater Struct 22(8):084010. https://doi.org/10.1088/0964-1726/22/8/08401010.1088/0964-1726/22/8/084010 ↗
20. Scarpa FL, Bullough WA, Lumley P (2004) Trends in acoustic properties of iron particle seeded auxetic polyurethane foam. ARCHIVE Proc Inst Mech Eng Part C J Mech Eng Sci 203–210(2):241. https://doi.org/10.5150/jngcgc.2004.057-S10.5150/jngcgc.2004.057-S ↗
21. Chekkal I, Bianchi M, Remillat C et al (2010) Vibro-Acoustic properties of auxetic open cell foam: model and experimental results. Acta Acustica United Acustica 96(2):266–274. https://doi.org/10.3813/AAA.91827610.3813/AAA.918276 ↗
22. Duc ND, Bich DH, Cong PH (2016) Nonlinear thermal dynamic response of shear deformable FGM plates on elastic foundations. J Therm Stresses 39(3):278–297. https://doi.org/10.1080/01495739.2015.112519410.1080/01495739.2015.1125194 ↗
23. Duc ND, Quan TQ, Khoa ND (2017) New approach to investigate nonlinear dynamic response and vibration of imperfect functionally graded carbon nanotube reinforced composite double curved shallow shells. Aerosp Sci Technol 71:360–372. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ast.2017.09.03110.1016/j.ast.2017.09.031 ↗
24. Ajdari A, Babaee S, Vaziri A (2011) Mechanical properties and energy absorption of heterogeneous and functionally graded cellular structures. Proc Eng 1:219–223. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.proeng.2011.04.03910.1016/j.proeng.2011.04.039 ↗
25. Prawoto Y (2012) Seeing auxetic materials from the mechanics point of view: a structural review on the negative Poisson’s ratio. Comput Mater Sci 58:140–153. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.commatsci.2012.02.01210.1016/j.commatsci.2012.02.012 ↗
26. Liebold-Ribeiro Yvonne, Körner Carolin (2014) Phononic band gaps in periodic cellular materials. Adv Eng Mater 16(3):328–334. https://doi.org/10.1002/adem.20130006410.1002/adem.201300064 ↗
27. Catapano A, Montemurro M (2014) A multi-scale approach for the optimum design of sandwich plates with honeycomb core. Part II: the optimisation strategy. Compos Struct 118:677–690. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compstruct.2014.07.05710.1016/j.compstruct.2014.07.057 ↗
28. Seepersad CC, Kumar RS, Allen JK et al (2004) Multifunctional design of prismatic cellular materials. J Comput Aided Mater Des 11(2–3):163–181. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10820-005-3167-010.1007/s10820-005-3167-0 ↗
29. Seepersad CC, Allen JK, Mcdowell DL et al (2008) Multifunctional topology design of cellular material structures. J Mech Des 130(3):031404. https://doi.org/10.1115/1.282987610.1115/1.2829876 ↗
30. Ju J, Summers JD, Ziegert J, et al (2009) Design of honeycomb meta-materials for high shear flexure. In: ASME 2009 international design engineering technical conferences and computers and information in engineering conference. American Society of Mechanical Engineers, pp 805–813. https://doi.org/10.1115/DETC2009-8773010.1115/DETC2009-87730 ↗
31. Boucher MA, Smith CW, Scarpa F et al (2013) Effective topologies for vibration damping inserts in honeycomb structures. Compos Struct 106:1–14. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compstruct.2013.05.03610.1016/j.compstruct.2013.05.036 ↗
32. Strek T, Jopek H, Idczak E (2016) Computational design of two-phase auxetic structures. Physica status solidi (b) 253(7):1387–1394. https://doi.org/10.1002/pssb.20160012010.1002/pssb.201600120 ↗
33. Radman A, Huang X, Xie YM (2013) Topology optimization of functionally graded cellular materials. J Mater Sci 48(4):1503–1510. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10853-012-6905-110.1007/s10853-012-6905-1 ↗
34. Findeisen C, Hohe J, Kadic M, Gumbsch P (2017) Characteristics of mechanical metamaterials based on buckling elements. J Mech Phys Solids 102:151–164. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jmps.2017.02.01110.1016/j.jmps.2017.02.011 ↗
35. Xu B, Huang X, Xie YM (2016) Two-scale dynamic optimal design of composite structures in the time domain using equivalent static loads. Compos Struct 142:335–345. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compstruct.2016.01.09010.1016/j.compstruct.2016.01.090 ↗
36. Long K, Han D, Gu X (2017) Concurrent topology optimization of composite macrostructure and microstructure constructed by constituent phases of distinct Poisson’s ratios for maximum frequency. Comput Mater Sci 129:194–201. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.commatsci.2016.12.01310.1016/j.commatsci.2016.12.013 ↗
37. Qin H, Yang D, Ren C (2018) Modelling theory of functional element design for metamaterials with arbitrary negative Poisson’s ratio. Comput Mater Sci 150:121–133. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.commatsci.2018.03.05610.1016/j.commatsci.2018.03.056 ↗
38. Pradhan PK, Mandal A, Baidya DK et al (2008) Dynamic response of machine foundation on layered soil: cone model versus experiments. Geotech Geol Eng 26(4):453–468. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10706-008-9181-810.1007/s10706-008-9181-8 ↗
39. Qi Libo, Zou Mingsong, Liu Shuxiao et al (2019) Use of impedance mismatch in the control of coupled acoustic radiation of the submarine induced by propeller-shaft system. Mar Struct 65:249–258. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.marstruc.2019.02.00110.1016/j.marstruc.2019.02.001 ↗
40. Grima JN, Manicaro E, Attard D (2011) Auxetic behaviour from connected different-sized squares and rectangles. Proc R Soc Lon A: Math Phys Eng Sci R Soc 467(2126):439–458. https://doi.org/10.1098/rspa.2010.017110.1098/rspa.2010.0171 ↗
41. Gibson LJ, Ashby MF (1999) Cellular solids: structure and properties. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge
42. Grima JN, Gatt R, Ellul B et al (2010) Auxetic behaviour in non-crystalline materials having star or triangular shaped perforations. J Non-Cryst Solids 356(37–40):1980–1987. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jnoncrysol.2010.05.07410.1016/j.jnoncrysol.2010.05.074 ↗
43. Schwerdtfeger J, Wein F, Leugering G et al (2011) Design of auxetic structures via mathematical optimization. Adv Mater 23(22–23):2650–2654. https://doi.org/10.1002/adma.20100409010.1002/adma.201004090 ↗
44. Guoyang Guan, Guiqiong Jiao, Zengguang Zhang (2005) Uniaxial macro-mechanical property and failure mode of a 2D-moven C/SiC composite. Acta Materiae Compositae Sinica 22(4):81–85. https://doi.org/10.3321/j.issn:1000-3851.2005.04.01410.3321/j.issn:1000-3851.2005.04.014 ↗
45. Carneiro VH, Puga H, Meireles J (2016) Analysis of the geometrical dependence of auxetic behavior in reentrant structures by finite elements. Acta Mech Sin 32(2):295–300. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10409-015-0534-210.1007/s10409-015-0534-2 ↗
46. Zhang XW, Yang DQ (2016) Mechanical properties of auxetic cellular material consisting of re-entrant hexagonal honeycombs. Materials 9(11):900. https://doi.org/10.3390/ma911090010.3390/ma9110900 ↗
47. Hönig A, Stronge WJ (2002) In-plane dynamic crushing of honeycomb. Part I: crush band initiation and wave trapping. Int J Mech Sci 44(8):1665–1696. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0020-7403(02)00060-710.1016/S0020-7403(02)00060-7 ↗