journal article·2009-09

Determination of large deformation and fracture behaviour of starch gels from conventional and wire cutting experiments

C. Gamonpilas, M. N. Charalambides, J. G. Williams

Journal of Materials Science· Volume 44· Issue 18
Publisher page

Abstract

Large deformation and fracture properties of two types of starch gels were investigated through uniaxial compression, single edge-notched bend (SENB) and wire cutting experiments. Tests were performed at various loading rates and for various starch/powder concentrations (%w/w). It was found that starch gels exhibit rate independent stress–strain behaviour but show rate-dependent fracture behaviour, i.e. stress–strain curves at three loading rates are similar but fracture stress and fracture strain increase with increasing strain rate. This is rather unusual and interesting behaviour. SENB and wire cutting experiments also revealed rate-dependent fracture behaviour and that the true fracture toughness (G c) values increase with loading/cutting speeds and starch powder concentration. In addition, the G c values from wire cutting and SENB tests were in reasonable agreement. The wire cutting process was also studied numerically using finite element techniques. A non-linear elastic constitutive relationship based on Ogden was used to model the starch gels and a frictionless condition was assumed at the wire–starch gel contact interface. A fracture criterion based on maximum principal strain was assumed for the prediction of the steady state cutting force.
Source: openaire · Quality: candidate unverified · Source record ↗

Research context

OpenAlex topics: High-Velocity Impact and Material Behavior · Cellular and Composite Structures · Automotive and Human Injury Biomechanics

SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.

References (21)

Show source-provided references
1. Kamyab I, Chakrabarti S, Williams JG (1998) J Mater Sci 33:2763. doi: 10.1023/A:101751733211210.1023/A:1017517332112 ↗
2. Dobraszczyk BJ, Atkins AG, Jeronimidis G, Purslow PP (1987) Meat Sci 21:2510.1016/0309-1740(87)90040-4 ↗
3. Xiao W, Charalambides MN, Williams JG (2006) Int J Food Sci Technol 42:69910.1111/j.1365-2621.2006.01483.x ↗
4. Vincent JFV, Jeronimidis G, Khan AA, Luyten H (1991) J Texture Stud 22:47
5. Goh SM, Charalambides M, Williams JG (2005) Eng Fract Mech 72:93110.1016/j.engfracmech.2004.07.015 ↗
6. Goh SM, Charalambides MN, Williams JG (2004) Mech Time-Dependant Mater 8:25510.1023/B:MTDM.0000046750.65395.fe ↗
7. Luyten H, Van Vliet T (1995) J Texture Stud 26:28110.1111/j.1745-4603.1995.tb00966.x ↗
8. Galliard T (1987) Starch: properties and potential. Wiley, UK
9. Imeson A (1997) Thickening and gelling agents for food. Aspen publishers Inc, Maryland10.1007/978-1-4615-2197-6 ↗
10. Gamonpilas C, Charalambides MN, Williams JG, Dooling PJ, Gibbon SR (2009) submitted for publication
11. Charalambides MN, Goh SM, Wanigasooriya L, Williams JG, Xiao W (2005) J Mater Sci 40:3375. doi: 10.1007/s10853-005-2846-210.1007/s10853-005-2846-2 ↗
12. Williams JG, Cawood MJ (1990) Polym Test 9:1510.1016/0142-9418(90)90045-F ↗
13. Ikeda S, Sangu T, Nishinari K (2003) Food Sci Technol Res 9:37210.3136/fstr.9.372 ↗
14. Treloar LRG (1975) The physics of rubber elasticity. Oxford University Press, UK
15. van Vliet T, Walstra P (1995) Faraday Discuss 101:35910.1039/fd9950100359 ↗
16. Charalambides MN, Gamonpilas C, Williams JG (2009) to be published
17. Williams JG, Rink M (2007) Eng Fract Mech 74:100910.1016/j.engfracmech.2006.12.017 ↗
18. ABAQUS Version 6.4 (2004) Hibbitt Karlsson and Sorensen Inc, Providence, RI
19. Luyten H, van Vliet T, Walstra P (1992) J Texture Stud 23:24510.1111/j.1745-4603.1992.tb00524.x ↗
20. Williams JG (1984) Fracture mechanics of polymers. Ellis Horwood Limited, UK
21. Atkins AG, Mai YW (1985) Elastic and plastic fracture. Ellis Horwood Limited, UK