journal article·2008-09

Anomalous electrical conductivity and percolation in carbon nanotube composites

Chunsheng Lu, Yiu-Wing Mai

Journal of Materials Science· Volume 43· Issue 17
Publisher page

Abstract

Transport properties of disordered multiphase materials, such as electrical and thermal conductivities, have been an active research area in statistical physics for decades. In a composite consisting of conductive fillers dispersed in an insulating matrix, there is a well-defined insulator– conductor transition when an infinite conductive network or path throughout the matrix is formed. This process can be well described by percolation theory [1, 2]. Recently, carbon nanotube (CNT)-reinforced composites and suspensions have attracted a great deal of attention due to their excellent properties and many potential applications. CNTs have a unique set of mechanical and physical properties, including extremely high Young’s modulus, strength, electrical, and thermal conductivities. The current experiments showed that CNT-reinforced composites exhibit an electrical percolation with addition of 0.1 vol.% or less fillers, at which electrical conductivity rises sharply by several orders of magnitude [3–7]. Here, the percolation threshold of CNTs is closely dependent on their geometric factors (e.g., volume fraction, size, shape, and orientation) and the interaction between them. It is a critical issue in producing conductive composites for use in films, coatings, and paints since the lower percolation threshold can reduce the loading of expensive CNTs, leading to lighter composites. In comparison with composites reinforced with isotropic particles, however, the percolation threshold of composites containing highly anisotropic conductor fillers such as CNTs is still not well understood. The term ‘‘percolation’’ refers to the onset of a sharp transition or an infinite network (or cluster) at which longrange connectivity suddenly appears [1]. The electrical conductivity near the percolation threshold is anomalously greater than that predicted by traditional theoretical models, such as Maxwell, Hamilton-Crosser models [8]. Intuitively, the electrical percolation process in CNT composites is similar to traditional ones with the addition of isotropic conductive particles, but with an ultra-low percolation threshold. As shown in Fig. 1, near the percolation threshold, the probability or fraction of a CNT, P, on the infinite cluster obeys a power law and can be described as P 1⁄2/ /cðaÞ bðaÞ; ð1Þ
Source: openaire · Quality: candidate unverified · Source record ↗

Research context

OpenAlex topics: Carbon Nanotubes in Composites · Graphene research and applications · Thermal properties of materials

SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.

References (17)

Show source-provided references
1. Zallen R (1983) The physics of amorphous solids. Wiley, New York10.1002/3527602798 ↗
2. Stauffer D, Aharony A (1994) Introduction to percolation theory. Taylor & Francis, London
3. Sandler JKW, Kirk JE, Kinloch IA, Shaffer MSP, Windle AH (2003) Polymer 44:589310.1016/S0032-3861(03)00539-1 ↗
4. Bryning MB, Islam MF, Kikkawa JM, Yodh AG (2005) Adv Mater 17:118610.1002/adma.200401649 ↗
5. Vigolo B, Coulon C, Maugey M, Zakri C, Poulin P (2005) Science 309:92010.1126/science.1112835 ↗
6. Stankovich S, Dikin DA, Dommett GHB, Kohlhaas KM, Zimney EJ, Stach EA, Piner RD, Nguyen ST, Ruoff RS (2006) Nature 442:28210.1038/nature04969 ↗
7. Kovacs JZ, Velagala BS, Schulte K, Bauhofer W (2007) Compos Sci Technol 67:92210.1016/j.compscitech.2006.02.037 ↗
8. Choi SUS, Zhang ZG, Yu W, Lockwood FE, Grulke EA (2001) Appl Phys Lett 79:225210.1063/1.1408272 ↗
9. Lu C, Mai Y-W (2005) Phys Rev Lett 95:08830310.1103/PhysRevLett.95.088303 ↗
10. Lu C, Mai Y-W (2007) Compos Sci Technol 67:289510.1016/j.compscitech.2007.05.008 ↗
11. Takayasu H (1990) Fractals in the physical sciences. Manchester University Press, Manchester
12. Garboczi EJ, Snyder KA, Douglas JF, Thorpe MF (1995) Phys Rev E 52:81910.1103/PhysRevE.52.819 ↗
13. Foygel M, Morris RD, Anez D, French S, Sobolev VL (2005) Phys Rev B 71:10420110.1103/PhysRevB.71.104201 ↗
14. Du F, Fischer JE, Winey KI (2005) Phys Rev B 72:12140410.1103/PhysRevB.72.121404 ↗
15. Biercuk MJ, Liaguno MC, Radosavljevic M, Hyun JK, Johnson AT, Fischer JE (2002) Appl Phys Lett 80:276710.1063/1.1469696 ↗
16. Shenogina N, Shenogin S, Xue L, Keblinski P (2005) Appl Phys Lett 87:13310610.1063/1.2056591 ↗
17. Gojny FH, Wichmann MHG, Fiedler B, Kinloch IA, Bauhofer W, Windle AH, Schulte K (2006) Polymer 47:203610.1016/j.polymer.2006.01.029 ↗