Investigation of long-term hydrophobic recovery of plasma modified polypropylene
Source abstract
Abstract
This study concerns the surface and adhesive properties of isotactic polypropylene (iPP) modified by an electric discharge plasma and affected by long-term hydrophobic recovery of the polymer surface after modification. The investigations were focused on the change in polarity of the modified polymer expressed by the polar fraction as well as on the decrease in the surface free energy, its polar component and mechanical work of adhesion (A m) to polyvinyl acetate. A m of modified iPP to polyvinyl acetate as a function of polar fraction can be described by a mathematical formula. It has been confirmed that the most intensive decrease in the surface and adhesive properties investigated is produced by the long-term hydrophobic recovery of the polymer appears in the course of the first 30 days after its modification. During subsequent aging the process of polymer hydrophobic recovery proceeds more slowly. It has been found that the value of surface and adhesive properties of iPP as well as the dynamics of the decrease in these properties during hydrophobic recovery of the surface after modification is, in the main, dependent on the iPP crystallinity.
Source: openaire · Quality: candidate unverified · Source record ↗
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Surface Modification and Superhydrophobicity · Advanced Sensor and Energy Harvesting Materials · Polymer Nanocomposite Synthesis and Irradiation
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
References (23)
Show source-provided references
1. S. Bhat and D. J. Upadhyay, J. Appl. Pol. Sci. 86 (2002) 925.10.1002/app.11024 ↗
2. D. E. Bergbreiter, B. Walchuk, B. Holtzman and H. N. Gray, Macromolecules 31 (1998) 3417.10.1021/ma980040b ↗
3. G. L. Tao, A. J. Gong, J. J. Sue and D. E. Bergbreiter, ibid. 34 (2001) 7672.10.1021/ma010941b ↗
4. C. H. Wang and R. G. Weiss, ibid. 32 (1999) 7032.10.1021/ma990732f ↗
5. Y. Uyama, K. Kato and Y. Ikada, Adv. Polym. Sci. 137 (1998) 1.10.1007/3-540-69685-7_1 ↗
6. C. S. Ha, Y. W. Cho, J. H. Go and W. J. Cho, J. Appl. Polym. Sci. 77 (2000) 2777.10.1002/1097-4628(20000919)77:12<2777::AID-APP260>3.0.CO;2-5 ↗
7. I. NovÁk, J. Mater. Sci. Let. 15 (1996) 1137.10.1007/BF00539960 ↗
8. A. S. Vasconcellos, J. A. P. Oliveira and R. Neto-Baumhardt, Eur. Polym. J. 33 (1997) 1731.10.1016/S0014-3057(97)00049-9 ↗
9. I. NovÁk and V. PollÁk, Angew. Makromol. Chem. 220 (1994) 189.10.1002/apmc.1994.052200116 ↗
10. I. NovÁk, ibid. 236 (1996) 35.10.1002/apmc.1996.052360103 ↗
11. E. Boucher, J. P. Folkers, C. Creton, H. Hervet and L. Leger, Macromolecules 30 (1997) 2102.10.1021/ma961105i ↗
12. J. F. Friedrich, P. Rohrer, T. Gross A. Lippitz and W. Unger, Surf. Coat. Technol. 59 (1993) 371.10.1016/0257-8972(93)90115-5 ↗
13. X. Tu, R. A. Young and Fr. Denes, Cellulose 1 (1994) 87.10.1007/BF00818801 ↗
14. Ch. Sun, D. Zhang and L. C. Wadsworth, Adv. Polym. Technol. 18 (1999) 171.10.1002/(SICI)1098-2329(199922)18:2<171::AID-ADV6>3.0.CO;2-8 ↗
15. Y. Tsuchiya, K. Akutu and A. Iwata, Progr. Organ. Coat. 34 (1998) 100.10.1016/S0300-9440(97)00117-3 ↗
16. Z. Hruska and X. Lepot, J. Fluor. Chem. 105 (2000) 87.10.1016/S0022-1139(00)00292-X ↗
17. M. D. Green, F. J. Guild and R. D. Adams, Intern. J. Adhes. Adhesives 22 (2002) 81.10.1016/S0143-7496(01)00040-9 ↗
18. I. L. J. Dogue and N. Mermilliod, J. Adhes. Adhesives 15 (1995) 205.10.1016/0143-7496(96)83700-6 ↗
19. A. Kaminska, H. Kaczmarek and J. Kowalonek, Eur. Polym. J. 38 (2002) 1915.10.1016/S0014-3057(02)00059-9 ↗
20. J. M. Strobel, M. Strobel, C. S. Lyons, C. Dunatov and S. J. Peron, J. Adhes. Sci. Technol. 5 (1991) 119.10.1163/156856191X00080 ↗
21. N. Y. Cui and N. M. D. Brown, Appl. Surf. Sci. 189 (2002) 31.10.1016/S0169-4332(01)01035-2 ↗
22. H. K. Yasuda, Y. S. Lin and Q. S. Yu, Progr. Organ. Coat. 42 (2001) 236.10.1016/S0300-9440(01)00179-5 ↗
23. S. Meiners, J. G. H. Salge, E. Prinz and F. Forster, Surf. Coat. Technol. 98 (1998) 1121.10.1016/S0257-8972(97)00234-X ↗