journal article·2012-08

Influence of polymer type, composition, and interface on the structural and mechanical properties of core/sheath type bicomponent nonwoven fibers

Mehmet Dasdemir, Benoit Maze, Nagendra Anantharamaiah, Behnam Pourdeyhimi

Journal of Materials Science· Volume 47· Issue 16
Publisher page

Abstract

In this study, we investigated the effect of polymer type, composition, and interface on the structural and mechanical properties of core–sheath type bicomponent nonwoven fibers. These fibers were produced using poly(ethylene terephthalate)/polyethylene (PET/PE), polyamide 6/polyethylene (PA6/PE), polyamide 6/polypropylene (PA6/PP), polypropylene/polyethylene (PP/PE) polymer configurations at varying compositions. The crystallinity, crystalline structure, and thermal behavior of each component in bicomponent fibers were studied and compared with their homocomponent counterparts. We found that the fiber structure of the core component was enhanced in PET/PE, PA6/PE, and PA6/PP whereas that of the sheath component was degraded in all polymer combinations compared to corresponding single component fibers. The degrees of these changes were also shown to be composition dependent. These results were attributed to the mutual interaction between two components and its effect on the thermal and stress histories experienced by polymers during bicomponent fiber spinning. For the interface study, the polymer–polymer compatibility and the interfacial adhesion for the laminates of corresponding polymeric films were determined. It was shown that PP/PE was the most compatible polymer pairing with the highest interfacial adhesion value. On the other hand, PET/PE was found to be the most incompatible polymer pairings followed by PA6/PP and PA6/PE. Accordingly, the tensile strength values of the bicomponent fibers deviated from the theoretically estimated values depending on core–sheath compatibility. Thus, while PP/PE yielded a higher tensile strength value than estimated, other polymer combinations showed lower values in accordance with their degree of incompatibility and interfacial adhesion. These results unveiled the direct relation between interface and tensile response of the bicomponent fiber.
Source: openaire · Quality: candidate unverified · Source record ↗

Research context

OpenAlex topics: Textile materials and evaluations · Natural Fiber Reinforced Composites · Mechanical Behavior of Composites

SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.

References (42)

Show source-provided references
1. Cooke TF (1996) In: Lewin M, Preston J (eds) High technology fibers, part D. Marcel Dekker Inc, New York
2. Wilkie AE (1999) Int Nonwovens J 8:146
3. Khatwani PA, Yardi SS (2003) Man Made Text India 46:19
4. Jeffries R (1971) Bicomponent fibres. Merrow Publishing Co. Ltd, Watford
5. Zhang JM, Peijs T (2010) Composites Part A 41:964. doi: 10.1016/j.compositesa.2010.03.01210.1016/j.compositesa.2010.03.012 ↗
6. Dasdemir M, Maze B, Anantharamaiah N et al (2011) J Mater Sci 46:3269. doi: 10.1007/s10853-010-5214-910.1007/s10853-010-5214-9 ↗
7. Kikutani T, Arikawa S, Takaku A et al (1995) Sen-i Gakkaishi 51:40810.2115/fiber.51.9_408 ↗
8. Kikutani T, Radhakrishnan J, Arikawa S et al (1996) J Appl Polym Sci 62:1913. doi: 10.1002/(SICI)1097-4628(19961212)62:11<1913:AID-APP16>3.0.CO;2-Z10.1002/(SICI)1097-4628(19961212)62:11<1913::AID-APP16>3.0.CO;2-Z ↗
9. Radhakrishnan J, Kikutani T, Okui N (1996) Sen-i Gakkaishi 52:61810.2115/fiber.52.11_618 ↗
10. Radhakrishnan J, Kikutani T, Okui N (1997) Text Res J 67:68410.1177/004051759706700908 ↗
11. Cho HH, Kim KH, Kang YA et al (2000) J Appl Polym Sci 77:2254. doi: 10.1002/1097-4628(20000906)77:10<2254:AID-APP19>3.0.CO;2-M10.1002/1097-4628(20000906)77:10<2254::AID-APP19>3.0.CO;2-M ↗
12. Cho HH, Kim KH, Kang YA et al (2000) J Appl Polym Sci 77:2267. doi: 10.1002/1097-4628(20000906)77:10<2267:AID-APP20>3.0.CO;2-510.1002/1097-4628(20000906)77:10<2267::AID-APP20>3.0.CO;2-5 ↗
13. Shi XQ, Ito H, Kikutani T (2006) Polymer 47:611. doi: 10.1016/j.polymer.2005.11.05110.1016/j.polymer.2005.11.051 ↗
14. Fedorova N (2006) Ph.D. Dissertation. North Carolina State University, Raleigh, NC
15. Houis S, Schmid M, Lübben J (2007) J Appl Polym Sci 106:1757. doi: 10.1002/app.2684610.1002/app.26846 ↗
16. El-Salmawy A, Kimura Y (2001) Text Res J 71:145. doi: 10.1177/00405175010710020910.1177/004051750107100209 ↗
17. Iroh JO (1999) In: Mark JE (ed) Polymer data handbook. Oxford University Press, New York
18. Durany A, Anantharamaiah N, Pourdeyhimi B (2008) International nonwovens technical conference, Houston, TX
19. Boucher E, Folkers JP, Hervet H et al (1996) Macromolecules 29:774. doi: 10.1021/ma950942210.1021/ma9509422 ↗
20. Brown HR (2001) Macromolecules 34:3720. doi: 10.1021/ma991821v10.1021/ma991821v ↗
21. Creton C, Kramer EJ, Hui CY et al (1992) Macromolecules 25:3075. doi: 10.1021/ma00038a01010.1021/ma00038a010 ↗
22. Eastwood EA, Dadmun MD (2002) Macromolecules 35:5069. doi: 10.1021/ma011701z10.1021/ma011701z ↗
23. Laurens C, Creton C, Loger L (2004) Macromolecules 37:6814. doi: 10.1021/ma040025910.1021/ma0400259 ↗
24. Seo Y, Kim H (2008) Int J Mater Form 1:79510.1007/s12289-008-0295-6 ↗
25. Washiyama J, Kramer EJ, Hui CY (1993) Macromolecules 26:2928. doi: 10.1021/ma00063a04310.1021/ma00063a043 ↗
26. Washiyama J, Kramer EJ, Creton CF et al (1994) Macromolecules 27:2019. doi: 10.1021/ma00086a00710.1021/ma00086a007 ↗
27. Choi YB, Kim SY (1999) J Appl Polym Sci 74:2083. doi: 10.1002/(SICI)1097-4628(19991121)74:8<2083:AID-APP25>3.0.CO;2-G10.1002/(SICI)1097-4628(19991121)74:8<2083::AID-APP25>3.0.CO;2-G ↗
28. Wunderlich B (1973) Macromolecular physics. Academic Press, New York
29. Mehta A, Gaur U, Wunderlich B (1978) J Polym Sci Polym Phys Ed 16:289. doi: 10.1002/pol.1978.18016020910.1002/pol.1978.180160209 ↗
30. Clark EJ, Hoffman JD (1984) Macromolecules 17:878. doi: 10.1021/ma00134a05810.1021/ma00134a058 ↗
31. Runt J, Harrison IR (1980) In: Marton L, Marton C, Fava RA (eds) Methods of experimental physics: polymers, crystal structure and morphology. Academic Press, New York
32. Bershteæin VA, Egorov VM (1994) Differential scanning calorimetry of polymers: physics, chemistry, analysis, technology. Ellis Horwood, New York
33. Small PA (1953) J Appl Chem 3:7110.1002/jctb.5010030205 ↗
34. Hoy KL (1970) J Paint Technol 42:76
35. van Krevelen PW (1972) Properties of polymers. Elsevier, Amsterdam
36. Coleman MM, Graf JF, Painter PC (1991) Specific interactions and the miscibility of polymer blends: practical guides for predicting & designing miscible polymer mixtures. Technomic Publishing Co, Lancaster, PA
37. Coleman MM, Painter PC (2006) Miscible polymer blends background and guide for calculations and design. DEStech Publications, Inc, Lancaster, PA
38. Benkoski JJ, Flores P, Kramer EJ (2003) Macromolecules 36:3289. doi: 10.1021/ma034013j10.1021/ma034013j ↗
39. Kim H, Rafailovich M, Sokolov J (2004) Polym Int 53:287. doi: 10.1002/pi.136710.1002/pi.1367 ↗
40. Kanninen MF (1973) Int J Fract 9:8310.1007/BF00035958 ↗
41. Nielsen LE (1978) Predicting the properties of mixtures. Marcel Dekker, Inc., New York
42. Mallick PK (2008) Fiber-reinforced composites: materials, manufacturing, and design. CRC Press, Boca Raton, FL