Temperature dependence of electrical conductivity in double-wall and multi-wall carbon nanotube/polyester nanocomposites
Source abstract
Abstract
The aim of this study is to investigate temperature dependence of electrical conductivity of carbon nanotube (CNT)/polyester nanocomposites from room temperature to 77 K using four-point probe test method. To produce nanocomposites, various types and amounts of CNTs (0.1, 0.3 and 0.5 wt.%) were dispersed via 3-roll mill technique within a specially formulized resin blend of thermoset polyesters. CNTs used in the study include multi walled carbon nanotubes (MWCNT) and double-walled carbon nanotubes (DWCNT) with and without amine functional groups (–NH2). It was observed that the incorporation of carbon nanotubes into resin blend yields electrically percolating networks and electrical conductivity of the resulting nanocomposites increases with increasing amount of nanotubes. However, nanocomposites containing amino functionalized carbon nanotubes exhibit relatively lower electrical conductivity compared to those with non-functionalized carbon nanotubes. To get better interpretation of the mechanism leading to conductive network via CNTs with and without amine functional groups, the experimental results were fitted to fluctuation-induced tunneling through the barriers between the metallic regions model. It was found that the results are in good agreement with prediction of proposed model.
Source: openaire · Quality: candidate unverified · Source record ↗
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Carbon Nanotubes in Composites · Conducting polymers and applications · Graphene research and applications
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
References (24)
Show source-provided references
1. Iijima S (1991) Nature (London) 354:5610.1038/354056a0 ↗
2. Balasubramanian K, Burghard M (2005) Small 1(2):18010.1002/smll.200400118 ↗
3. Khare R, Bose S (2005) J Min Mater Character Eng 4:31
4. Yu MF, Lourie O, Dyer MJ, Moloni K, Kelly TF, Ruoff RS (2000) Science 287:63710.1126/science.287.5453.637 ↗
5. Allaoui A, Bai S, Cheng HM, Bai JB (2002) Compos Sci Technol 62:199310.1016/S0266-3538(02)00129-X ↗
6. Kim P, Shi L, Majumdar A, Maceuen PL (2001) Phys Rev Lett 87:5502
7. Martin CA, Sandler JKW, Windle AH, Schwarz MK, Bauhofer W, Schulte K, Shaffer MSP (2005) Polymer 46:87710.1016/j.polymer.2004.11.081 ↗
8. Sandler J, Schaffer MSP, Prasse T, Bauhofer W, Schulte K, Windle AH (1999) Polymer 40:596710.1016/S0032-3861(99)00166-4 ↗
9. Du F, Scogna RC, Zhou W, Brand S, Fischer JE, Winey KI (2004) Macromolecules 37:904810.1021/ma049164g ↗
10. Gojny FH, Wichmann MHG, Fiedler B, Kinloch IA, Bauhofer W, Windle AH, Schulte K (2006) Polymer 47:203610.1016/j.polymer.2006.01.029 ↗
11. Kymakis E, Alexandaou I, Amaratunga GAJ (2002) Synthetic Met 127:5910.1016/S0379-6779(01)00592-6 ↗
12. Astorga HR, Mendoza D (2005) Opt Mater 27:122810.1016/j.optmat.2004.11.014 ↗
13. Sandler JKW, Kirk JE, Kinloch IA, Schaffer MSP, Windle AH (2003) Polymer 44:893
14. Jiang X, Bin Y, Matsuo M (2005) Polymer 46:741810.1016/j.polymer.2005.05.127 ↗
15. Sheng P (1980) Phys Rev B 21:218010.1103/PhysRevB.21.2180 ↗
16. Bockrath M, Cobden DH, Lu J, Rinzler AG, Smalley RE, Balemts L, Mcquen PL (1999) Nature 397:598–60110.1038/17569 ↗
17. Mischenko EG, Andreev AV, Glazman LI (2001) Phys Rev Lett 87:24680110.1103/PhysRevLett.87.246801 ↗
18. Meyorsan B, Smith FW (1980) Solid State Commun 34:53110.1016/0038-1098(80)90144-1 ↗
19. Mott NF, Davis EA (1979) In: Electronic processes in Non-Crystalline Materials Clarendon, Oxford, p 231
20. Kim GT, Jhang SH, Park JG, Park YW, Roth S (2001) Synthetic Met 117:12310.1016/S0379-6779(00)00551-8 ↗
21. Sichel EK, Sheng P, Gittlemann JI, Bozowski S (1981) Phys Rev B 24:613110.1103/PhysRevB.24.6131 ↗
22. Kymakis E, Amaratunga GAJ (2006) J Appl Phys 99:08430210.1063/1.2189931 ↗
23. Thostenson ET, Chouj TW (2003) Phys D: Appl Phys 36:573–58210.1088/0022-3727/36/5/323 ↗
24. Bajpai A, Nigam AK (2007) Phys Rev B 75:06440310.1103/PhysRevB.75.064403 ↗