Measure of morphological and performance properties in polymeric silicone foams by X-ray tomography
Source abstract
Abstract
In the absence of nuclear weapons testing, assuring comparable material performance for replacement of no-longer-available material with modern formulations is difficult. The replacement material must completely replicate the performance of the original. Quantification of morphological characteristics in three dimensions by micro X-ray computed tomography (μCT) lends statistics and property values not otherwise achieved. This allows for the measurement of lot-to-lot, synthesis formula variations, as well as pre- and post-experimental structural changes that would be invisible to qualitative image comparison techniques. Owing to the unavailability of the original material, several novel formulations of poly(dimethylsiloxane) (PDMS) foams were imaged and quantitatively compared to aid in choosing a replacement material. In this study, bulk properties were measured with μCT including, percent void volume, average void equivalent diameter and others, and were collected for four different formulations of PDMS foams from pristine, return for service, as well as samples that were aged by gamma ray exposure. Performance characteristics (e.g., Poisson ratio) were measured and compared. From this study, we will be able to provide more information for the selection of the material that most closely matches the performance of the original material.
Source: openaire · Quality: candidate unverified · Source record ↗
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Advanced X-ray and CT Imaging · Medical Imaging Techniques and Applications · Radiation Shielding Materials Analysis
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
References (37)
Show source-provided references
1. Park H, Miwa K (2003) Mater Trans 44:232610.2320/matertrans.44.2326 ↗
2. Elmoutaouakkil A, Salvo L, Maire E, Peix G (2002) Adv Eng Mater 4:80310.1002/1527-2648(20021014)4:10<803::AID-ADEM803>3.0.CO;2-D ↗
3. Calvo S, Beugre D, Crine M, Leonard A, Marchot P, Toye D (2009) Chem Eng Process 48:103010.1016/j.cep.2009.02.001 ↗
4. Jaeggi C, Mooser R, Frauchinger V, Wyss P (2009) Mater Lett 63:264310.1016/j.matlet.2009.09.023 ↗
5. Dudek MA, Hunter L, Kranz S, Williams JJ, Lau SH, Chawla N (2010) Mater Charact 61:43310.1016/j.matchar.2010.01.011 ↗
6. Montminy M, Tannenbaum AR, Macosko CW (2004) J Colloid Interface Sci 280:20210.1016/j.jcis.2004.07.032 ↗
7. Labouriau A, Cox JD, Schoonover JR et al (2007) Polym Degrad Stab 92:41410.1016/j.polymdegradstab.2006.11.017 ↗
8. Rutherford SW, Coons JE (2007) J Colloid Interface Sci 306:22810.1016/j.jcis.2006.10.068 ↗
9. Weber O, Rack A, Redenbach C, Schulz M, Wirjadi O (2011) J Mater Sci 46:3568. doi: 10.1007/s10853-011-5270-910.1007/s10853-011-5270-9 ↗
10. Lin CL, Miller JD (2005) Powder Technol 154:6110.1016/j.powtec.2005.04.031 ↗
11. Maire E, Elmoutaouakkil A, Fazekas A, Salvo L (2003) MRS Bull 28:28410.1557/mrs2003.82 ↗
12. Viot P, Bernard D, Plougonven E (2007) J Mater Sci 42:7202. doi: 10.1007/s10853-006-1422-810.1007/s10853-006-1422-8 ↗
13. Roux S, Hild F, Viot P, Bernard D (2008) Compos A Appl Sci Manuf 39:1253. doi: 10.1016/j.compositesa.2007.11.01110.1016/j.compositesa.2007.11.011 ↗
14. Weber E, Fernandez M, Wapner P, Hoffman W (2009) Carbon 48:215110.1016/j.carbon.2009.11.047 ↗
15. Buffière JY, Maire E, Cloetens P, Lormand G, Fougères R (1999) Acta Mater 47:1613. doi: 10.1016/s1359-6454(99)00024-510.1016/S1359-6454(99)00024-5 ↗
16. Maire E, Paolo C, Jerome A, Laurent B, Biasetto L (2007) J Eur Ceram Soc 27:197310.1016/j.jeurceramsoc.2006.05.097 ↗
17. Patterson BM, Hamilton CE (2010) Anal Chem 82:8537. doi: 10.1021/ac101522q10.1021/ac101522q ↗
18. Buffiere JY, Ferrie E, Proudhon H, Ludwig W (2006) Mater Sci Technol 22:101910.1179/174328406X114135 ↗
19. Huang H, Eddinger SA, Schoff M (2009) Fusion Sci Technol 55:37310.13182/FST55-373 ↗
20. Freyer M, Ale A, Schulz R, Zientkowska M, Ntziachristos V, Englmeier KH (2010) J Biomed Opt 15:03600610.1117/1.3431101 ↗
21. Patterson BM, Escobedo-Diaz JP, Dennis-Koller D, Cerreta EK (2012) Microsc Microanal 18:39010.1017/S1431927611012554 ↗
22. Mader K, Marone F, Hintermuller C, Mikuljan G, Isenegger A, Stampanoni M (2011) J Synchrotron Radiat 18:117. doi: 10.1107/S090904951004737010.1107/S0909049510047370 ↗
23. Patel M, Chinn S, Maxwell R, Wilson TS, Birdsell SA (2010) Polym Degrad Stab 95:249910.1016/j.polymdegradstab.2010.07.038 ↗
24. Hawley ME, Wrobleski DA, Orler EB et al (2004) Mater Res Soc Symp Proc 791:93
25. Smith RA, Paulus M, Branning J, Phillips PJ (2001) J Cellular Plast 37:23110.1106/3BWD-3D89-3JLL-MPJN ↗
26. Gjersing E, Chinn S, Giuliani JR et al (2007) Macromolecules (Washington, DC, United States) 40:495310.1021/ma0620924 ↗
27. Brook MA (2000) Silicon in organic, organometallic, and polymer chemistry. Wiley, New York
28. Coons JE, McKay MD, Hamada MS (2006) Polym Degrad Stab 91:182410.1016/j.polymdegradstab.2005.11.009 ↗
29. Blair MW, Muenchausen RE, Taylor RD, Labouriau A, Cooke DW, Stephens TS (2008) Polym Degrad Stab 93:158510.1016/j.polymdegradstab.2008.04.014 ↗
30. Gibson LJ, Ashby MF (1997) Cellular solids: structure and properties. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge10.1017/CBO9781139878326 ↗
31. Pierron F, McDonald SA, Hollis D, Withers PJ, Alderson A (2011) Appl Mech Mater 70:9310.4028/www.scientific.net/AMM.70.93 ↗
32. Poveda R, Gupta N, Porfiri M (2010) Mater Lett 64:236010.1016/j.matlet.2010.07.063 ↗
33. BM Patterson, K Henderson, Z Smith, D Zhang, P Giguere (2012) Microsc Anal 26
34. Horst RH, Stephens TS, Coons JE, Winter HH (2003) Rev Sci Instrum 74:473710.1063/1.1611617 ↗
35. Yoo SH, Yee L, Cohen C (2010) Polymer 51:1608. doi: 10.1016/j.polymer.2010.01.06710.1016/j.polymer.2010.01.067 ↗
36. J Williams, K Yazzie, Phillips NC et al (2011) Metall Mater Trans A 42:3845. doi: 10.1007/s11661-011-0963-x10.1007/s11661-011-0963-x ↗
37. Williams JJ, Chapman NC, Jakkali V et al (2011) Metall Mater Trans A 42:299910.1007/s11661-011-0718-8 ↗