Electrophoretic deposition for coatings and free standing objects
Source abstract
Abstract
A simulation of the electrophoretic deposition process is presented, which allows one to predict the yield of deposition as a function of time for different values of the electrical properties of the liquid and the powders used. It is shown that with special precautions, conditions can be defined where the resistance of the deposit will limit its thickness. Under most conditions however, particularly if a liquid with reasonable electrical conductivity is used, the resistance of the deposit should not limit its growth. Other issues which are of importance in the shaping of free standing objects are also discussed, in particular the electrode shape and electric field distribution, separation of the deposit from the electrode and drying of the object.
Source: openaire · Quality: candidate unverified · Source record ↗
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Electrophoretic Deposition in Materials Science · Additive Manufacturing and 3D Printing Technologies · Material Selection and Properties
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
References (26)
Show source-provided references
1. O. Van Der Biest and L. Vandeperre, Annual Rev. Mater. Sci. 29 (1999) 327.10.1146/annurev.matsci.29.1.327 ↗
2. J. Tabellion and R. Clasen, Key Engin Mater. 206–213 (2001) 397.10.4028/www.scientific.net/KEM.206-213.397 ↗
3. H. C. Hamaker, Trans. Faraday Soc. (1940) 279.10.1039/tf9403500279 ↗
4. A. Sussman and T. J. Ward, RCA Review 42 (1981) 178.
5. Y. Hirata, A. Nishimoto and Y. Ishihara, Nippon Seramikkusu Kyukai Gakujutsu Ronbinshi 99 (1991) 108.10.2109/jcersj.99.108 ↗
6. S. Put, J. Vleugels, G. AnnÉ and O. Van Der Biest, Colloids and Surfaces A: Physicochem. Eng. Aspects 222 (2003) 223.10.1016/S0927-7757(03)00227-9 ↗
7. E. Massoud, Interceram 2 (1979) 117.
8. M. Mihailescu, M. Emandi, V. Vancea and M. Marcu., ibid. 40(3) (1991) 165.
9. M. Aveline, Industrie Céramique 581 (1966) 28.
10. M. Boncoeur and S. Carpenter, ibid. 648 (1972) 79.
11. M. S. Chronberg and F. HÄndle, Interceram 1 (1978) 33.
12. J. M. Andrews, J. Dracass, A. H. Collins and D. C. Cornish, Proc. Brit. Ceram. Soc. 12 (1969) 211.
13. R. Naß, H. Schmidt, W. Storch, F. Harbach, R. Neeff and H. Nienburg, in “Ceramic Powder Processing Science”, edited by H. Hausner, G. L. Messing and S. Hirano (Deutsche Keramische Gesellschaft, 1989) p. 625.
14. J. H. Jean, Mater. Chem. Phys. 40 (1995) 285.10.1016/0254-0584(95)01477-2 ↗
15. L. Vandeperre, O. Van Der Biest, F. Bouyer, J. Persello and A. Foissy, J. Eur. Ceram. Soc. 17(2) (1997) 373.10.1016/S0955-2219(96)00106-9 ↗
16. L. J. Vandeperre, O. Van Der Biest, F. Bouyer and A. Foissy, Ceram. Bull. 77(1) (1998) 53.
17. H. Wittwer and H. G. KrÜger, Ber DKG 72(9) (1995) 556.
18. K. Moritz and T. Reetz, Ber DKG 70(7) (1993) 348.
19. J. H. Kennedy and A. Foissy, J. Electrochem. Soc. 122(4) (1975) 482.10.1149/1.2134244 ↗
20. R. W. Powers, Ceram. Bull. 65(9) (1986) 1270.
21. G. W. Scherer, J. Amer. Ceram. Soc. 73(1) (1990) 3.10.1111/j.1151-2916.1990.tb05082.x ↗
22. S. Put, J. Vleugels, G. AnnÉ and O. Van Der Biest, J. Mater. Sci. 39 (2004) 881.10.1023/B:JMSC.0000012917.51982.9d ↗
23. A. R. Boccaccini and C. B. Ponton, JOM (1995) 34.10.1007/BF03221282 ↗
24. L. Vandeperre and O. Van Der Biest, J. Eur. Ceram. Soc. 18 (1998) 1915.10.1016/S0955-2219(98)00130-7 ↗
25. G. AnnÉ, S. Put, J. Vleugels and O. Van Der Biest, in Proceedings of the First International Conference on Electrophorectic Deposition: Fundamentals and Applications, August 18–22, 2002, Banff, Alberta, Canada, ISBN 1-56677-345-8, in Proceedings Volume 2002–21 The Electrochemical Society, (2002) p. 206.
26. S. Put, J. Vleugels and O. Van Der Biest, Scrip. Mater 45(10) (2001) 1139.10.1016/S1359-6462(01)01126-5 ↗