journal article·2012-06

Fabrication and characterization of carbon fiber reinforced clay/epoxy composite

Yuanxin Zhou, Mahesh Hosur, Shaik Jeelani, P. K. Mallick

Journal of Materials Science· Volume 47· Issue 12
Publisher page

Abstract

In this study, dynamic mechanical analysis (DMA), thermogravimetric analysis (TGA), and flexural tests were performed on unfilled, 1, 2, 3, and 4 wt% clay filled SC-15 epoxy to identify the effect of clay weight fraction on thermal and mechanical properties of the epoxy matrix. The flexural results indicate that 2.0 wt% clay filled epoxy showed the highest improvement in flexural strength. DMA studies also revealed that 2.0 wt% system exhibit the highest storage modulus and Tg as compared to neat and other weight fraction. However, TGA results show that thermal stability of composite is insensitive to the clay content. Based on these results, the nanophased epoxy with 2 wt% clay was then utilized in a vacuum assisted resin transfer molding set up with carbon fabric to fabricate laminated composites. The effectiveness of clay addition on thermal and mechanical properties of composites has been evaluated by TGA, DMA, tensile, flexural, and fatigue test. 5 °C increase in glass transition temperature was found in nanocomposite, and the tensile and flexural strengths improved by 5.7 and 13.5 %, respectively as compared to the neat composite. The fatigue strength was also improved significantly. Based on the experimental result, a linear damage model combined with the Weibull distribution function has been established to describe static failure processing of neat and nanophased carbon/epoxy. The simulated stress–strain curves from the model are in good agreement with the test data. Simulated results show that damage processing of neat and nanophased carbon/epoxy described by bimodal Weibull distribution function.
Source: openaire · Quality: candidate unverified · Source record ↗

Research context

OpenAlex topics: Epoxy Resin Curing Processes · Polymer Nanocomposites and Properties · Tribology and Wear Analysis

SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.

References (30)

Show source-provided references
1. Imanaka M, Nakamura Y, Nishimura A, Iida T (2003) Compos Sci Technol 63(1):4110.1016/S0266-3538(02)00175-6 ↗
2. Chikhi N, Fellahi S, Bakar M (2002) Eur Polym J 38(2):25110.1016/S0014-3057(01)00194-X ↗
3. Xian GJ, Walter R, Haupert F (2006) Compos Sci Technol 66(16):319910.1016/j.compscitech.2005.02.022 ↗
4. Vasconcelos PV, Lino FJ, Magalhaes A, Neto RJL (2005) J Mater Process Technol 170(1–2):27710.1016/j.jmatprotec.2005.05.006 ↗
5. Zhou Y, Pervin F, Biswas MA, Rangari V, Jeelani S (2006) Mater Lett 60(7):86910.1016/j.matlet.2005.10.042 ↗
6. Wang WX, Takao Y, Matsubara T, Kim HS (2002) Compos Sci Technol 62(6):76710.1016/S0266-3538(02)00052-0 ↗
7. Sherman D, Lemaitre J, Leckie F (1995) Acta Metall Mater 43(12):448310.1016/0956-7151(95)00136-J ↗
8. Chisholm N, Mahfuz H, Rangari VK, Ashfaq A, Jeelani S (2005) Compos Struct 67(1):11510.1016/j.compstruct.2004.01.010 ↗
9. Gojny FH, Wichmann MHG, Fiedler B, Bauhofer W, Schulte K (2005) Composites A 36(11):152510.1016/j.compositesa.2005.02.007 ↗
10. Yano K, Uzuki A, Okada A, Kurauchi T, Kamigaito O (1993) J Polym Sci A 31(10):249310.1002/pola.1993.080311009 ↗
11. Via RA, Ishii H, Giannelis EP (1993) Chem Mater 5(12):169410.1021/cm00036a004 ↗
12. Messersmith PB, Giannelis EP (1995) J Polym Sci A 33(7):104710.1002/pola.1995.080330707 ↗
13. Zhang Y-Q, Lee J-H, Jang H-J, Nah C-W (2004) Composites B 35(2):13310.1016/S1359-8368(03)00068-4 ↗
14. Delhom CD, White-Ghoorahoo LA, Pang SS (2010) Composites B 41(6):47510.1016/j.compositesb.2009.10.007 ↗
15. Li P, Siddaramaiah, Kim NH, Heo S-B, Lee J-H (2008) Composites B 39(5):75610.1016/j.compositesb.2007.11.003 ↗
16. Wu ZG, Zhou CX, Qi RR, Zhang HB (2002) J Appl Polym Sci 83(11):240310.1002/app.10198 ↗
17. Tyan HL, Liu YC, Wei KH (1999) Polymer 40(17):487710.1016/S0032-3861(98)00716-2 ↗
18. Zainuddin S, Hosur MV, Zhou Y, Narteh AT, Kumar A, Jeelani S (2010) Mater Sci Eng A 527(29–30):792010.1016/j.msea.2010.08.078 ↗
19. Ma J, Zhang S, Qi ZN (2001) J Appl Polym Sci 82(6):144410.1002/app.1982 ↗
20. Ke YC, Long CF, Qi ZN (1999) J Appl Polym Sci 71(7):113910.1002/(SICI)1097-4628(19990214)71:7<1139::AID-APP12>3.0.CO;2-E ↗
21. Donnet JB (2003) Compos Sci Technol 63(8):108510.1016/S0266-3538(03)00028-9 ↗
22. Zhou YX, Pervin F, Rangari V, Jeelani S (2007) J Mater Process Technol 191(3):34710.1016/j.jmatprotec.2007.03.059 ↗
23. Xu Y, Hoa V (2008) Compos Sci Technol 68(3–4):85410.1016/j.compscitech.2007.08.013 ↗
24. Bozkurt E, Kaya E, Tanoglu M (2007) Compos Sci Technol 67(15–16):339410.1016/j.compscitech.2007.03.021 ↗
25. Kornmann X, Rees M, Thomann Y, Necola A, Barbezat M, Thoman R (2005) Compos Sci Technol 65(14):225910.1016/j.compscitech.2005.02.006 ↗
26. Subramaniyan AK, Sun CT (2006) Composites A 37(12):225710.1016/j.compositesa.2005.12.027 ↗
27. Chowdury FH, Hosur MV, Jeelani S (2006) Mater Sci Eng A 421:29810.1016/j.msea.2006.01.074 ↗
28. Lin L, Lee J, Hong C, Yoo G, Advani SG (2006) Compos Sci Technol 66(13):211610.1016/j.compscitech.2005.12.025 ↗
29. Miyagawa H, Jurek RJ, Mohanty AK, Misra M, Drzal LT (2006) Composites A 37(1):5410.1016/j.compositesa.2005.05.014 ↗
30. Zainuddin S, Hosur MV, Zhou Y, Kumar A, Jeelani S (2010) Mater Sci Eng A 527(13–14):309110.1016/j.msea.2010.02.022 ↗