Preparation of Ce1−x Fe x O2 solid solution and its catalytic performance for oxidation of CH4 and CO
Source abstract
Abstract
A series of Ce1−x Fe x O2 (0 < x ≤ 0.5) catalysts were prepared by the co-precipitation method, and their catalytic performances were investigated for the total oxidation of CO and CH4 as model reactions. X-ray diffraction (XRD) and Raman spectroscopy results show that Ce1−x Fe x O2−δ solid solutions are formed with x ≤ 0.2. Ce0.9Fe0.1O2 solid solution presents superior catalytic performance for CH4 and CO oxidation, while Ce1−x Fe x O2 with x > 0.2 shows less active for CO and CH4 oxidation. The results of H2-temperature programmed reduction (H2-TPR), CH4-temperature programmed surface reaction (CH4-TPSR) and CO-TPSR reveal that, the surface oxygen of catalyst is relevant to CO oxidation, which was promoted by the oxygen vacancies formed in Ce–Fe–O solid solution, while the easier lattice oxygen migration property and the favorable reducibility of the catalysts is responsible for the promoted catalytic performance for CH4 oxidation.
Source: openaire · Quality: candidate unverified · Source record ↗
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Catalytic Processes in Materials Science · Catalysis and Oxidation Reactions · Catalysts for Methane Reforming
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
References (25)
Show source-provided references
1. Zwinkels MFM, Jaras SG, Menon PG (1993) Catal Rev Sci 35:31910.1080/01614949308013910 ↗
2. Choudhary TV, Banerjee S, Choudhary VR (2002) Appl Catal A Gen 234:110.1016/S0926-860X(02)00231-4 ↗
3. Gu C, Miao J, Liu Y, Wang YQ (2010) J Mater Sci 45:5660. doi: 10.1007/s10853-010-4631-010.1007/s10853-010-4631-0 ↗
4. Wang XH, Lu GZ, Guo Y, Jiang LZ, Guo YL, Li CZ (2009) J Mater Sci 44:1294. doi: 10.1007/s10853-009-3275-410.1007/s10853-009-3275-4 ↗
5. Trovarelli A, de Leitenburg C, Boaro M, Dolcetti G (1999) Catal Today 50:35310.1016/S0920-5861(98)00515-X ↗
6. Trovarelli A, de Leitenburg C, Llorca J, Dolcetti G (1995) J Catal 151:11110.1006/jcat.1995.1014 ↗
7. Cao JL, Deng QF, Yuan ZY (2009) J Mater Sci 44:6663. doi: 10.1007/s10853-009-3582-910.1007/s10853-009-3582-9 ↗
8. Trovarelli A (1999) Comments Inorg Chem 20:26310.1080/02603599908021446 ↗
9. Pérez-Alonso FJ, López Granados M, Ojeda M, Terreros P, Rojas S, Fierro JLG, Gracia M, Gancedo R (2005) Chem Mater 17:232910.1021/cm0477669 ↗
10. Gupta A, Kumar A, Waghmare UV, Hegde MS (2009) Chem Mater 21:488010.1021/cm901906e ↗
11. Liu CW, Luo LT, Lu X (2008) Kinet Catal 49:67610.1134/S0023158408050121 ↗
12. Li KZ, Wang H, Wei YG, Yan DX (2010) Chem Eng J 156:51210.1016/j.cej.2009.04.038 ↗
13. Li KZ, Wang H, Wei YG, Yan DX (2010) Appl Catal B Environ 97:36110.1016/j.apcatb.2010.04.018 ↗
14. Perez-Alonso FJ, Melián-Cabrera I, López Granados M, Kapteijn F, Fierro JLG (2006) J Catal 239:34010.1016/j.jcat.2006.02.008 ↗
15. Weber WH, Hass KC, McBride JR (1993) Phys Rev B 48:17810.1103/PhysRevB.48.178 ↗
16. Mcbride JR, Hass KC, Poindexter BD (1994) J Appl Phys 76:243510.1063/1.357593 ↗
17. Spanier JE, Robinson RD, Zhang F, Chan SW, Herman IP (2001) Phys Rev B 64:24540710.1103/PhysRevB.64.245407 ↗
18. de Faria DLA, Silva SV, de Oliveira MT (1997) J Raman Spectrosc 28:87310.1002/(SICI)1097-4555(199711)28:11<873::AID-JRS177>3.0.CO;2-B ↗
19. Barbosa AL, Herguido J, Santamaria J (2001) Catal Today 64:4310.1016/S0920-5861(00)00507-1 ↗
20. Voskoboinikov TV, Chen HY, Sachtler WMH (1998) Appl Catal B Environ 19:27910.1016/S0926-3373(98)00082-4 ↗
21. Tang X, Zhang B, Li Y, Xu Y, Xin Q, Shen W (2004) Catal Today 93:19110.1016/j.cattod.2004.06.040 ↗
22. Hu YP, Jin HF, Liu JR, Hao DS (2000) Chem Eng J 78:14710.1016/S1385-8947(00)00133-9 ↗
23. Galvita V, Sundmacher K (2007) J Mater Sci 42:9300. doi: 10.1007/s10853-007-1872-710.1007/s10853-007-1872-7 ↗
24. Terribile D, Trovarelli A, de Leitenburg C, Primavera A, Dolcetti G (1999) Catal Today 47:13310.1016/S0920-5861(98)00292-2 ↗
25. Sayle TXT, Parker SC, Catlow CRA (1994) Surf Sci 316:32910.1016/0039-6028(94)91225-4 ↗