Comparison of two contact models in the simulation of friction stir welding process
Source abstract
Abstract
Two contact models are used to simulate the thermo-mechanical interaction process in friction stir welding. Comparison shows that the classical Coulomb friction model can be accurate enough for the simulation of friction stir welding in lower angular velocity. But in higher angular velocity, the classical Coulomb friction model fails to work due to the increase of the dynamic effect of the welding tool. Because the shear failure of material is considered in modified Coulomb friction model, the increase of the frictional stress on the tool–plate interface is limited by the shear failure. So, this model can keep valid even when the angular velocity of the welding tool is increased to a high level.
Source: openaire · Quality: candidate unverified · Source record ↗
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Advanced Welding Techniques Analysis · Welding Techniques and Residual Stresses · Aluminum Alloys Composites Properties
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
References (32)
Show source-provided references
1. Thomas WM, Nicholas ED, Needham JC, Murch MG, Templesmith P, Dawes CJ (1991) Friction stir welding, International Patent Application No. PCT/GB92102203 and Great Britain Patent Application No. 9125978.8
2. Squillace A, De Fenzo A, Giorleo G, Bellucci F (2004) J Mater Process Technol 152:97. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jmatprotec.2004.03.02210.1016/j.jmatprotec.2004.03.022 ↗
3. Reynolds AP, Tang W, Khandkar Z, Khan JA, Lindner K (2005) Sci Technol Weld Join 10(2):190. doi: https://doi.org/10.1179/174329305X3702410.1179/174329305X37024 ↗
4. Colegrove PA, Shercliff HR (2003) Sci Technol Weld Join 8(5):360. doi: https://doi.org/10.1179/13621710322500553410.1179/136217103225005534 ↗
5. Chen CM, Kovacevic R (2004) Int J Mach Tools Manuf 44:1205. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijmachtools.2004.03.01110.1016/j.ijmachtools.2004.03.011 ↗
6. David SA, DebRoy T (1992) Science 257:497. doi: https://doi.org/10.1126/science.257.5069.49710.1126/science.257.5069.497 ↗
7. Khandkar MZH, Khan JA, Reynolds AP (2003) Sci Technol Weld Join 8(3):165. doi: https://doi.org/10.1179/13621710322501094310.1179/136217103225010943 ↗
8. Mandal S, Williamson K (2006) J Mater Process Technol 174:190. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jmatprotec.2005.12.01210.1016/j.jmatprotec.2005.12.012 ↗
9. Bastier A, Maintournam MH, Dang Van K, Roger F (2006) Sci Technol Weld Join 11(3):278. doi: https://doi.org/10.1179/174329306X10209310.1179/174329306X102093 ↗
10. Song M, Kovacevic R (2003) Int J Mach Tools Manuf 43:605. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/S0890-6955(03)00022-110.1016/S0890-6955(03)00022-1 ↗
11. Schmidt H, Hattel J (2005) Model Simul Mater Sci Eng 13:77. doi: https://doi.org/10.1088/0965-0393/13/1/00610.1088/0965-0393/13/1/006 ↗
12. Guerra M, Schmidt C, McClure JC, Murr LE, Nunes AC (2003) Mater Charact 49:95. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/S1044-5803(02)00362-510.1016/S1044-5803(02)00362-5 ↗
13. Colligan K (1999) Weld Res, Suppl Weld J:229
14. Li Y, Murr LE, McClure JC (1999) Mater Sci Eng A 271:213. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/S0921-5093(99)00204-X10.1016/S0921-5093(99)00204-X ↗
15. Muthukumaran S, Mukherjee SK (2006) Sci Technol Weld Join 11(3):337. doi: https://doi.org/10.1179/174329306X10766510.1179/174329306X107665 ↗
16. Reynolds AP (2000) Sci Technol Weld Join 5(2):120. doi: https://doi.org/10.1179/13621710010153811910.1179/136217100101538119 ↗
17. Buffa G, Hua J, Shivpuri R, Fratini L (2006) Mater Sci Eng A 419:389. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.msea.2005.09.04010.1016/j.msea.2005.09.040 ↗
18. Nandan R, Roy GG, Lienert TJ, Debroy T (2007) Acta Mater 55:883. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.actamat.2006.09.00910.1016/j.actamat.2006.09.009 ↗
19. Zhang HW, Zhang Z, Chen JT (2005) Mater Sci Eng A (403):340. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.msea.2005.05.05210.1016/j.msea.2005.05.052 ↗
20. Zhang HW, Zhang Z, Chen JT (2007) J Mater Process Technol 183:62. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jmatprotec.2006.09.02710.1016/j.jmatprotec.2006.09.027 ↗
21. Zhang Z, Zhang HW (2008) Int J Adv Manuf Technol 37:279. doi: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00170-007-0971-610.1007/s00170-007-0971-6 ↗
22. Zhang Z, Zhang HW (2007) Sci Technol Weld Join 12(3):226. doi: https://doi.org/10.1179/174329307X17791910.1179/174329307X177919 ↗
23. Nandan R, Roy GG, Lienert TJ, DebRoy T (2006) Sci Technol Weld Join 11(5):526. do https://doi.org/10.1179/174329306X107692 i:10.1179/174329306X107692 ↗
24. Feng AH, Ma ZY (2007) Scr Mater 56:397. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scriptamat.2006.10.03510.1016/j.scriptamat.2006.10.035 ↗
25. Ma ZY, Sharma SR, Mishra RS (2006) Mater Sci Eng A 433:269. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.msea.2006.06.09910.1016/j.msea.2006.06.099 ↗
26. Zhang HW, Zhong WX, Wu CH, Liao AH (2006) Int J Mech Sci 48:176. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijmecsci.2005.08.00310.1016/j.ijmecsci.2005.08.003 ↗
27. Zhang HW, Wang H, Wriggers P, Schrefler BA (2005) Comput Mech 36(6):444. doi: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00466-005-0680-710.1007/s00466-005-0680-7 ↗
28. Zhang Z, Zhang HW (2007) Int J Adv Manuf Technol 35:86. doi: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00170-006-0707-z10.1007/s00170-006-0707-z ↗
29. Liu HJ, Fujii H, Maeda M, Nogi K (2003) J Mater Sci Lett 22:441. doi: https://doi.org/10.1023/A:102295962779410.1023/A:1022959627794 ↗
30. Lin SB, Zhao YH, Wu L (2006) Mater Sci Technol 22(8):995. doi: https://doi.org/10.1179/174328406X10240810.1179/174328406X102408 ↗
31. Murr LE, Liu G, McClure JC (1997) J Mater Sci Lett 16:1801. doi: https://doi.org/10.1023/A:101855633235710.1023/A:1018556332357 ↗
32. Fratini L, Buffa G (2005) Int J Mach Tools Manuf 45:1188. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijmachtools.2004.12.00110.1016/j.ijmachtools.2004.12.001 ↗