journal article·2013-11

The effect of relative humidity and evaporation rate on electrospinning: fiber diameter and measurement for control implications

Yunshen Cai, Michael Gevelber

Journal of Materials Science· Volume 48· Issue 22
Publisher page

Abstract

This paper presents an experimental study of the influence that relative humidity and evaporation rate have on the electrospinning process in terms of fiber diameter, process measurements, and selection of operating regime (applied voltage and flow rate) for polyethylene oxide/water (aqueous) solutions and poly(vinylpyrrolidone)/alcohol (non-aqueous) solutions. Poly(vinylpyrrolidone) alcohol solutions are studied to understand the separate influence of relative humidity and evaporation rate. Correlations are developed that relate measurable process parameters (jet diameter, charge density) as well as relative humidity and evaporation rate to fiber diameter. In addition, the influence that relative humidity has on selection of operating regime to achieve desired fiber diameter and maximum production rate is presented.
Source: openaire · Quality: candidate unverified · Source record ↗

Research context

OpenAlex topics: Electrospun Nanofibers in Biomedical Applications · Advanced Sensor and Energy Harvesting Materials · Electrohydrodynamics and Fluid Dynamics

SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.

References (31)

Show source-provided references
1. Doshi J, Reneker DH (1995) Electrost J 35:15110.1016/0304-3886(95)00041-8 ↗
2. Srinivasan G, Reneker DH (1995) Polymer Int 36:19510.1002/pi.1995.210360210 ↗
3. Matthews JA et al (2002) Biomacromolecules 3:23210.1021/bm015533u ↗
4. Matthews JA et al (2003) J Bioactive Compat Polym 18:12510.1177/0883911503018002003 ↗
5. Boland ED et al (2004) Front Biosci 9:142210.2741/1313 ↗
6. Kwoun SJ, Lec RM, Han B and Ko FK (2000) In: The 2000 IEEE/EIA International Frequency Control Symposium and Exhibition, 7–9 June, 2000. The Westin Crown Center, Kansas City, Missouri, USA
7. Wang XY et al (2002) Nano Lett 2:127310.1021/nl020216u ↗
8. Han L et al (2009) MRS Proceedings, Symposium WW: Polymer nanofibers—fundamental studies and emerging applications. doi: 10.1557/PROC-1240-WW09-2710.1557/PROC-1240-WW09-27 ↗
9. Mertz T et al (2011) MRS Proceedings, Symposium MM: Organic biolelectronics and photonics for sensing and regulation. doi: 10.1557/opl.2011.87710.1557/opl.2011.877 ↗
10. Yan X, Gevelber M (2010) ASME dynamic systems and control conference, vol 2, p 51. doi: 10.1115/DSCC2010-420110.1115/DSCC2010-4201 ↗
11. Taylor GI (1966) Proc R Soc Lond Ser A 291:15910.1098/rspa.1966.0086 ↗
12. Yarin AL, Koombhongse S, Reneker DH (2007) Polymer 48:691310.1016/j.polymer.2007.09.017 ↗
13. Reneker DH, Yarin AL (2008) Polymer 49:238710.1016/j.polymer.2008.02.002 ↗
14. Yarin AL (1993) Free liquid jets and films: hydrodynamics and rheology. Longman/Wiley, Harlow/New York
15. Hohman MM et al (2001) Phys Fluids 13(8):220110.1063/1.1383791 ↗
16. Hohman MM et al (2001) Phys Fluids 13(8):222110.1063/1.1384013 ↗
17. Feng JJ (2002) Am Inst Phys. doi: 10.1063/1.151066410.1063/1.1510664 ↗
18. De Vrieze S et al (2009) J Mater Sci. doi: 10.1007/s10853-008-3010-610.1007/s10853-008-3010-6 ↗
19. Tripatanasuwan S, Zhong Z, Reneker DH (2007) Polymer 48:5742. doi: 10.1016/j.polymer.2007.07.04510.1016/j.polymer.2007.07.045 ↗
20. Huang L et al (2011) J Polym Sci, Part B: Polym Phys 49:173410.1002/polb.22371 ↗
21. Fridrikh SV et al (2003) Phys Rev Lett 90(14):14450210.1103/PhysRevLett.90.144502 ↗
22. Helgeson ME et al (2006) Am Inst Chem Eng. doi: 10.1002/aic.1105610.1002/aic.11056 ↗
23. Rutledge GC, Fridrikh SV (2007) Adv Drug Deliv Rev 59:138410.1016/j.addr.2007.04.020 ↗
24. Yarin AL (2001) Am Inst Phys. doi: 10.1063/1.140826010.1063/1.1408260 ↗
25. Greenspan L (1997) J Res Natl Bur Stand A 81A:8910.6028/jres.081A.011 ↗
26. Yan X (2011) PhD thesis, Boston University
27. Yan X, Gevelber M (2010) J Electrost 68:45810.1016/j.elstat.2010.06.009 ↗
28. Jayjock MA (1994) Am Ind Hyg Assoc J 55:23010.1080/15428119491019078 ↗
29. Yarin AL (2001) Am Inst Phys. doi: 10.1063/1.133303510.1063/1.1333035 ↗
30. Shin YM et al (2001) Polymer 42(25):995510.1016/S0032-3861(01)00540-7 ↗
31. Yu JH, Fridrikh SV, Rutledge GC (2006) Polymer 47(13):478910.1016/j.polymer.2006.04.050 ↗