journal article·2001-04

Frequency effects on the fatigue behaviour on carbon fibre reinforced polymer laminates

V. Barron, M. Buggy, N. H. McKenna

Journal of Materials Science· Volume 36· Issue 7
Publisher page

Abstract

Test frequency exerts a considerable influence on dynamic mechanical behaviour of carbon fibre reinforced materials. In this study the effect of test frequency on the fatigue behaviour of the T300/914C system, a carbon fibre/epoxy matrix composite, is examined. Tension-tension fatigue tests were carried out at various stress levels and at three test frequencies (5, 10 and 20 Hz) for three specimen orientations (unidirectional, (0)8, crossply (0°/90°)4s and angleply (±45°c)4s). A number of dynamic mechanical properties were monitored throughout specimen lifetimes and subsequently analysed — stress/life behaviour, maximum strain, normalised fatigue modulus, dynamic loss modulus, damping factor and specimen temperature. Frequency effects are found to profoundly influence the fatigue behaviour of both crossply and angle ply specimens. Angleply specimen fatigue response exhibits a strong dependence on test frequency, a fact that is reflected in the dynamic mechanical property responses monitored. The data obtained for unidirectional specimens is inconclusive due to the large degree of fatigue scatter observed.
Source: openaire · Quality: candidate unverified · Source record ↗

Research context

OpenAlex topics: Engineering Applied Research · Structural Load-Bearing Analysis · Mechanical Behavior of Composites

SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.

References (14)

Show source-provided references
1. R. Talreja, in “Fatigue of Composite Materials” (Technomic Publishing, Lancaster, PA, 1987).
2. D. S. Saunders and G. Clark, Materials Forum 17 (1993) 309.
3. P. T. Curtis and G. Dorey, in Proceedings of the International Conference on Fatigue of Engineering Materials and Structures I (Mech. E., London, 1986) p. 297.
4. Rotem, SAMPE Journal 30(3) (1994) 10.
5. Y. Miyano, M. Nakada, H. Kudoh and R. Muki, J. Composite Materials 34(7) (2000) 538.10.1177/002199830003400701 ↗
6. X. R. Xiao, J. of Composite Materials 33(12) (1999) 1141.10.1177/002199839903301205 ↗
7. J. W. Dally and L. J. Broutman, J. Composite Materials 1 (1967) 424.10.1177/002199836700100410 ↗
8. J. B. Sturgeon, in Proceedings of the 28th Annual Tech. Conf. Reinforced Plastics/Composites Institute (The Society of the Plastics Industry Inc., 1973) Section 2-B 1.
9. C. T. Sun and W. S. Chan, ASTM STP 674 418 (1979).
10. D. C. Curtis, D. R. Moore and B. Slater, N. Zahran Composites 19(6) (1988) 446.10.1016/0010-4361(88)90702-1 ↗
11. G. C. Tsai, J. F. Doyle and C. T. Sun, in Proceedings of the 1st Parsons International Turbine Conference, Dublin, 1984.
12. G. C. Tsai, J. F. Doyle and C. T. Sun, J. of Composite Materials 21 (1987) 2.10.1177/002199838702100101 ↗
13. Ciba-Geigy Information sheet No. FTA49e, August 1984.
14. H. T. Hwang and K. S. Han, J. Composite Materials 20 (1986) 154.10.1177/002199838602000203 ↗