journal article·2015-08

Effect of a carbon nanotube coating on friction and impact performance of Kevlar

E. D. LaBarre, X. Calderon-Colon, M. Morris, J. Tiffany, E. Wetzel, A. Merkle, M. Trexler

Journal of Materials Science· Volume 50· Issue 16
Publisher page

Abstract

Because surface treatments of high-performance fibers have previously resulted in increased friction and improved impact performance, it was of interest to evaluate the influence of multi-walled carbon nanotubes (MWNTs) on impact performance and contributing constituent properties of Kevlar. Kevlar K129 yarns and fabrics were modified via sonication in a solution of N-methylpyrrolidone (NMP) and MWNTs. This method has the potential to both improve the intrinsic properties of the fibers themselves as well as increase the friction, with very low mass addition. Tensile, static friction, and pull-out tests were performed to compare the properties of MWNT-treated materials to neat. As a result of MWNT augmentation, yarn modulus increased up to 15 %, and static and kinetic friction coefficients increased up to 30 %. Yarn pull-out tests revealed up to a 230 % increase in the forces required to pull-out yarns. To study the effects of MWNT augmentation on dynamic performance, low-velocity impact tests of steel spheres on a single ply of fabric were performed. These experiments demonstrated approximately 50 % increase in ballistic limit for MWNT-treated Kevlar with negligible (0.4–1.4 %) increase in mass. Entanglement among MWNTs along with increased surface roughness and surface area increased the resistance to motion, improving impact performance by increasing the energy required to pull-out yarns from the textile, while inhibiting textile windowing and driving a larger number of yarn failures. The observed changes in fabric response suggest that MWNT treatments have the potential to improve the ballistic limit of fabrics through increased interfilament and interyarn friction without compromising fiber strength or adding significant mass.
Source: openaire · Quality: candidate unverified · Source record ↗

Research context

OpenAlex topics: Mechanical Behavior of Composites · Natural Fiber Reinforced Composites · Carbon Nanotubes in Composites

SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.

References (32)

Show source-provided references
1. Hitt LJK DARPA Defense Sciences Office. Warrior Web 2012 http://www.darpa.mil/Our_Work/DSO/Programs/Warrior_Web.aspx
2. Lane R (2005) High performance fibers for personnel and vehicle armor systems. AMPTIAC Q 9(2):3–9
3. Grujicic M et al (2011) Multi-length scale computational derivation of Kevlar((R)) yarn-level material model. J Mater Sci 46(14):4787–4802. doi: 10.1007/s10853-011-5389-810.1007/s10853-011-5389-8 ↗
4. Martinez M et al (1993) Friction and wear behavior of Kevlar fabrics. J Mater Sci 28:1305–1311. doi: 10.1080/00222348.2011.58319510.1007/BF01191969 ↗
5. Tan VBC, Lim CT, Cheong CH (2003) Perforation of high-strength fabric by projectiles of different geometry. Int J Impact Eng 28(2):207–22210.1016/S0734-743X(02)00055-6 ↗
6. Carr DJ (1999) Failure mechanisms of yarns subjected to ballistic impact. J Mater Sci Lett 18(7):585–58810.1023/A:1006655301587 ↗
7. Jacobs MJN, Van Dingenen JLJ (2001) Ballistic protection mechanisms in personal armour. J Mater Sci 36(13):3137–3142. doi: 10.1023/A:101792200009010.1023/A:1017922000090 ↗
8. Briscoe BJ, Motamedi F (1992) The ballistic impact characteristics of aramid fabrics—the influence of interface friction. Wear 158(1–2):229–24710.1016/0043-1648(92)90041-6 ↗
9. Bazhenov S (1997) Dissipation of energy by bulletproof aramid fabric. J Mater Sci 32(15):4167–4173. doi: 10.1023/A:101867452899310.1023/A:1018674528993 ↗
10. Kirkwood JE et al (2004) Yarn pull-out as a mechanism for dissipating ballistic impact energy in Kevlar((R)) KM-2 fabric—Part II: predicting ballistic performance. Text Res J 74(11):939–94810.1177/004051750407401101 ↗
11. Gawandi A, Thostenson E, Gilllespie J Jr (2011) Tow pullout behavior of polymer-coated Kevlar fabric. J Mater Sci 46(1):77–89. doi: 10.1007/s10853-010-4819-310.1007/s10853-010-4819-3 ↗
12. Kalman DP et al (2009) Effect of particle hardness on the penetration behavior of fabrics intercalated with dry particles and concentrated particle-fluid suspensions. Acs Appl Mater Interfaces 1(11):2602–261210.1021/am900516w ↗
13. Sun D, Chen X (2012) Plasma modification of Kevlar fabrics for ballistic applications. Text Res J 82(18):1928–193410.1177/0040517512450765 ↗
14. Yu M-F et al (2000) Strength and breaking mechanism of multiwalled carbon nanotubes under tensile load. Science 287(5453):637–64010.1126/science.287.5453.637 ↗
15. Demczyk BG et al (2002) Direct mechanical measurement of the tensile strength and elastic modulus of multiwalled carbon nanotubes. Mater Sci Eng A 334(1–2):173–17810.1016/S0921-5093(01)01807-X ↗
16. Hearle JWS (2001) High Performance Fibres. CRC Press, New york10.1533/9781855737549 ↗
17. O’Connor I et al (2009) High-strength, high-toughness composite fibers by swelling kevlar in nanotube suspensions. Small 5(4):466–46910.1002/smll.200801102 ↗
18. Chen W et al (2012) Surface modification of Kevlar by grafting carbon nanotubes. J Appl Polym Sci 123(4):1983–199010.1002/app.34703 ↗
19. Cunniff PMA, Auerbach MA, Vetter E, Sikkema DJ (2002) High performance “M5″ fiber for ballistics/structural composites. In: 23rd. Army Science Conference; Assistant Secretary of the Army (Acquisition, Logistics and Technology), Orlando, Florida, 2002
20. LaBarre E, et al. (2013) Multi-scale testing techniques for carbon nanotube augmented Kevlar, in dynamic behavior of materials, Vol 1. In: Song B, Casem D, and Kimberley J (eds) Proceedings of the 2013 Annual Conference on Experimental and Applied Mechanics, Springer Verlag, New york, 2013
21. Dong Z, Sun CT (2009) Testing and modeling of yarn pull-out in plain woven Kevlar fabrics. Compos A Appl Sci Manuf 40(12):1863–186910.1016/j.compositesa.2009.04.019 ↗
22. Nikonova EA, Pakshver AB (1973) The friction properties of textile yarns. Fibre Chem 4(6):657–66010.1007/BF00545607 ↗
23. Rao MP et al (2009) Modeling the effects of yarn material properties and friction on the ballistic impact of a plain-weave fabric. Compos Struct 89(4):556–56610.1016/j.compstruct.2008.11.012 ↗
24. Grujicic M et al (2013) Molecular-level computational investigation of mechanical transverse behavior of p-phenylene terephthalamide (PPTA) fibers. Multidiscip Model Mater Struct 9(4):462–49810.1108/MMMS-11-2012-0018 ↗
25. Grujicic M, et al. (2013) Axial-Compressive Behavior, Including kink-band formation and propagation, of single p-phenylene terephthalamide (PPTA) Fibers. Adv Mater Sci Eng. doi: 10.1155/2013/32954910.1155/2013/329549 ↗
26. Grujicic M et al (2014) The effect of plain-weaving on the mechanical properties of warp and weft p-phenylene terephthalamide (PPTA) fibers/yarns. J Mater Sci 49(24):8272–8293. doi: 10.1007/s10853-014-8536-110.1007/s10853-014-8536-1 ↗
27. Briscoe BJ, Motamedi F (1990) Role of interfacial friction and lubrication in yarn and fabric mechanics. Text Res J 60(12):697–70810.1177/004051759006001201 ↗
28. Hearle JWSGPBS (1969) Structural mechanics of fibers, yarns, and fabrics Vol. 1. Wiley, New York
29. Grey SJ, Leaf GAV (1985) 21—The nature of inter-fibre frictional effects in woven-fabric bending. J Text Inst 76(5):314–32210.1080/00405008508658942 ↗
30. Zeng XS, Tan VBC, Shim VPW (2006) Modelling inter-yarn friction in woven fabric armour. Int J Numer Meth Eng 66(8):1309–133010.1002/nme.1596 ↗
31. Thomas JA, et al. (2012) Multiscale modeling of high-strength fibers and fabrics. In Proceeding of SPIE 8373, micro- and nanotechnology sensors, systems, and applications IV, p. 83731S-83731S, 201210.1117/12.919395 ↗
32. Lomicka C, et al. (2013) Improving ballistic fiber strength: insights from experiment and simulation in dynamic behavior of materials, Vol 1. In: Song B, Casem D, and Kimberley J (eds) Proceedings of the 2013 Annual Conference on Experimental and Applied Mechanics, Springer Verlag, New york, 2013