journal article·2017-08Open access

Cerium-doped bioactive 45S5 glasses: spectroscopic, redox, bioactivity and biocatalytic properties

Valentina Nicolini, Gianluca Malavasi, Ledi Menabue, Gigliola Lusvardi, Francesco Benedetti, Sergio Valeri, Paola Luches

Journal of Materials Science· Volume 52· Issue 15

Abstract

The ability of Ce-containing bioactive glasses, based on 45S5 Bioglass®, to inhibit oxidative stress in terms of reduction in hydrogen peroxide and superoxide (O2-), by mimicking the catalase and superoxide dismutase activity is reported in this work. The characterization is performed on the powders of pristine glasses and after the soaking in H2O2 solutions and simulated body fluid. The glass samples are analysed by XPS, XRD, UV-Vis and FT-IR. The best catalyst activities are obtained for the glass with the highest content of cerium (H_5.3 = 5.3 mol% of CeO2 in the nominal glass composition), and the best Ce3+/Ce4+ ratio in terms of catalase mimetic activity is found to be a function of H2O2 concentration. Moreover, the detailed study of the surface during the mimic enzymatic activity tests shows the formation of a Ca-P-rich layer on the glass surface, where the presence of Ce ions favours the formation of CePO4. The phosphate in turn inhibits the formation of hydroxyapatite, decreasing the bioactivity of the glass with the highest of CeO2 in the glass composition. This work shows the effect of Ce3+/Ce4+ ratio towards the catalase mimetic activity and for the first time the superoxide dismutase mimetic activity of Ce-containing 45S5-derived glasses.
Source: openaire · Quality: candidate unverified · Source record ↗

Research context

OpenAlex topics: Bone Tissue Engineering Materials · Dental Implant Techniques and Outcomes · Advanced Nanomaterials in Catalysis

SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.

References (32)

Show source-provided references
1. Hench LL (1993) An introduction to bioceramics. World Scientific, Singapore10.1142/2028 ↗
2. Hoppe A, Güldal NS, Boccaccini AR (2011) A review of the biological response to ionic dissolution products from bioactive glasses and glass-ceramics. Biomaterials 32:2757–2774. doi: 10.1016/j.biomaterials.2011.01.00410.1016/j.biomaterials.2011.01.004 ↗
3. Gerhardt L-C, Boccaccini AR (2010) Bioactive glass and glass-ceramic scaffolds for bone tissue engineering. Materials 3:3867–3910. doi: 10.3390/ma307386710.3390/ma3073867 ↗
4. Marie PJ (2006) Strontium ranelate: a physiological approach for optimizing bone formation and resorption. Bone 38:S10–S14. doi: 10.1016/j.bone.2005.07.02910.1016/j.bone.2005.07.029 ↗
5. Marie PJ, Ammann P, Boivin G, Rey C (2001) Mechanisms of action and therapeutic potential of strontium in bone. Calcif Tissue Int 69:121–12910.1007/s002230010055 ↗
6. Zreiqat H, Howlett CR, Zannettino A et al (2002) Mechanisms of magnesium-stimulated adhesion of osteoblastic cells to commonly used orthopaedic implants. J Biomed Mater Res 62:175–184. doi: 10.1002/jbm.1027010.1002/jbm.10270 ↗
7. Yamaguchi M (1998) Role of zinc in bone formation and bone resorption. J Trace Elem Exp Med 11:119–135. doi: 10.1002/(SICI)1520-670X(1998)11:2/3<119:AID-JTRA5>3.0.CO;2-310.1002/(SICI)1520-670X(1998)11:2/3<119::AID-JTRA5>3.0.CO;2-3 ↗
8. Palza H, Escobar B, Bejarano J et al (2013) Designing antimicrobial bioactive glass materials with embedded metal ions synthesized by the sol–gel method. Mater Sci Eng C 33:3795–3801. doi: 10.1016/j.msec.2013.05.01210.1016/j.msec.2013.05.012 ↗
9. Liu J, Rawlinson SCF, Hill RG, Fortune F (2016) Strontium-substituted bioactive glasses in vitro osteogenic and antibacterial effects. Dent Mater 32:412–422. doi: 10.1016/j.dental.2015.12.01310.1016/j.dental.2015.12.013 ↗
10. Gholipourmalekabadi M, Sameni M, Hashemi A et al (2016) Silver- and fluoride-containing mesoporous bioactive glasses versus commonly used antibiotics: activity against multidrug-resistant bacterial strains isolated from patients with burns. Burns 42:131–140. doi: 10.1016/j.burns.2015.09.01010.1016/j.burns.2015.09.010 ↗
11. Newby PJ, El-Gendy R, Kirkham J et al (2011) Ag-doped 45S5 Bioglass®-based bone scaffolds by molten salt ion exchange: processing and characterisation. J Mater Sci Mater Med 22:557–569. doi: 10.1007/s10856-011-4240-810.1007/s10856-011-4240-8 ↗
12. Nicolini V, Gambuzzi E, Malavasi G et al (2015) Evidence of catalase mimetic activity in Ce 3+/Ce 4+ doped bioactive glasses. J Phys Chem B 119:4009–4019. doi: 10.1021/jp511737b10.1021/jp511737b ↗
13. Nicolini V, Varini E, Malavasi G et al (2016) The effect of composition on structural, thermal, redox and bioactive properties of Ce-containing glasses. Mater Des 97:73–85. doi: 10.1016/j.matdes.2016.02.05610.1016/j.matdes.2016.02.056 ↗
14. Kolthoff IM (1969) Quantitative chemical analysis. Macmillan, London
15. Singh S, Dosani T, Karakoti AS et al (2011) A phosphate-dependent shift in redox state of cerium oxide nanoparticles and its effects on catalytic properties. Biomaterials 32:6745–6753. doi: 10.1016/j.biomaterials.2011.05.07310.1016/j.biomaterials.2011.05.073 ↗
16. McCormack RN, Mendez P, Barkam S et al (2014) Inhibition of nanoceria’s catalytic activity due to Ce3 + site-specific interaction with phosphate ions. J Phys Chem C 118:18992–19006. doi: 10.1021/jp500791j10.1021/jp500791j ↗
17. Swift P (1982) Adventitious carbon—the panacea for energy referencing? Surf Interface Anal 4:47–51. doi: 10.1002/sia.74004020410.1002/sia.740040204 ↗
18. Wagner CD, Muilenberg GE (1979) Handbook of x-ray photoelectron spectroscopy: a reference book of standard data for use in X-ray photoelectron spectroscopy. Physical Electronics Division, Perkin-Elmer Corp, Eden Prairie
19. Karakoti A, Singh S, Dowding JM et al (2010) Redox-active radical scavenging nanomaterials. Chem Soc Rev 39:4422. doi: 10.1039/b919677n10.1039/b919677n ↗
20. Pirmohamed T, Dowding JM, Singh S et al (2010) Nanoceria exhibit redox state-dependent catalase mimetic activity. Chem Commun 46:2736. doi: 10.1039/b922024k10.1039/b922024k ↗
21. Karakoti AS, Singh S, Kumar A et al (2009) pegylated nanoceria as radical scavenger with tunable redox chemistry. J Am Chem Soc 131:14144–14145. doi: 10.1021/ja905108710.1021/ja9051087 ↗
22. Ukeda H, Kawana D, Maeda S, Sawamura M (1999) Spectrophotometric assay for superoxide dismutase based on the reduction of highly water-soluble tetrazolium salts by xanthine–xanthine oxidase. Biosci Biotechnol Biochem 63:485–488. doi: 10.1271/bbb.63.48510.1271/bbb.63.485 ↗
23. Maçon ALB, Kim TB, Valliant EM et al (2015) A unified in vitro evaluation for apatite-forming ability of bioactive glasses and their variants. J Mater Sci Mater Med. doi: 10.1007/s10856-015-5403-910.1007/s10856-015-5403-9 ↗
24. Schumb WC, Satterfield CN, Wentworth RL (1956) Hydrogen peroxide, A. C. S. Monograph No. 128. Reinhold Publishing Corporation, New York
25. Lee SS, Song W, Cho M et al (2013) Antioxidant properties of cerium oxide nanocrystals as a function of nanocrystal diameter and surface coating. ACS Nano 7:9693–9703. doi: 10.1021/nn402680610.1021/nn4026806 ↗
26. Doremus RH (1975) Interdiffusion of hydrogen and alkali ions in a glass surface. J Non-Cryst Sol 19:137–144. doi: 10.1016/0022-3093(75)90079-410.1016/0022-3093(75)90079-4 ↗
27. Hench LL, Splinter RJ, Allen WC, Greenlee TK (1971) Bonding mechanisms at the interface of ceramic prosthetic materials. J Biomed Mater Res 5:117–141. doi: 10.1002/jbm.82005061110.1002/jbm.820050611 ↗
28. Vallet-Regí M, Izquierdo-Barba I, Salinas AJ (1999) Influence of P2O5 on crystallinity of apatite formed in vitro on surface of bioactive glasses. J Biomed Mater Res 46:560–565. doi: 10.1002/(SICI)1097-4636(19990915)46:4<560:AID-JBM14>3.0.CO;2-M10.1002/(SICI)1097-4636(19990915)46:4<560::AID-JBM14>3.0.CO;2-M ↗
29. Nakamoto K (2009) Infrared and Raman spectra of inorganic and coordination compounds, 6th edn. Wiley, Hoboken
30. Leonelli C, Lusvardi G, Malavasi G et al (2003) Synthesis and characterization of cerium-doped glasses and in vitro evaluation of bioactivity. J Non-Cryst Sol 316:198–216. doi: 10.1016/S0022-3093(02)01628-910.1016/S0022-3093(02)01628-9 ↗
31. Heckert EG, Karakoti AS, Seal S, Self WT (2008) The role of cerium redox state in the SOD mimetic activity of nanoceria. Biomaterials 29:2705–2709. doi: 10.1016/j.biomaterials.2008.03.01410.1016/j.biomaterials.2008.03.014 ↗
32. Yu P, Hayes SA, O’Keefe TJ et al (2006) The phase stability of cerium species in aqueous systems II. The systems. Equilibrium considerations and pourbaix diagram calculations. J Electrochem Soc 153:C74–C79. doi: 10.1149/1.213057210.1149/1.2130572 ↗