Tailoring materials properties of UFG aluminium alloys by accumulative roll bonded sandwich-like sheets
Source abstract
Abstract
Accumulative roll bonding (ARB) as a method of severe plastic deformation is a well-established process to produce ultrafine-grained (UFG) sheet materials with extraordinary mechanical properties. In this work ARB is applied to combine different sheet materials in order to tailor the materials properties by producing sandwich-like structures. The high strength aluminium alloy AA5754, after 4 ARB cycles (N4), is used as a core material. To achieve high corrosion resistance and good visual properties, it is cladded with commercially pure aluminium AA1050A (N4) at room temperature and alternatively with AA6014 (N4) at 230 °C. All materials are UFG and satisfactory bonding between the different layers of aluminium alloys is achieved. Nanoindentation measurements reveal that there is a sharp transition in hardness at the interface. The yield and tensile strength of the core material are fully retained in the case of the AA6014/AA5754 sandwich. The strength of the AA1050A/AA5754 sandwich is slightly lower compared to the core material but still twice as high as the clad material. The serrated yielding effect which is strongly visible in tensile tests on the pure AA5754 alloy completely disappears in the sandwich sheets, which means the surface quality is strongly enhanced.
Source: openaire · Quality: candidate unverified · Source record ↗
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Aluminum Alloys Composites Properties · Microstructure and mechanical properties · Metal Forming Simulation Techniques
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
References (24)
Show source-provided references
1. Saito Y, Tsuji N, Utsunomiya H, Sakai T, Hong RG (1998) Scripta Mater 39:122110.1016/S1359-6462(98)00302-9 ↗
2. Lee SH, Saito Y, Sakai T, Utsunomiya H (2002) Mater Sci Eng 325:22810.1016/S0921-5093(01)01416-2 ↗
3. Tsuji N, Saito Y, Lee SH, Minamino Y (2003) Adv Eng Mater 5:33810.1002/adem.200310077 ↗
4. Höppel HW, May J, Göken M (2004) Adv Eng Mater 6:78110.1002/adem.200306582 ↗
5. Topic I, Höppel HW, Göken M (2007) Int J Mater Res 98:32010.3139/146.101469 ↗
6. Miller WS, Zhuang L, Bottema J, Wittebrood AJ, De Smet P, Haszler A, Vieregge A (2000) Mater Sci Eng A 280:3710.1016/S0921-5093(99)00653-X ↗
7. May J, Höppel HW, Göken M (2006) Mater Sci Forum 503–504:78110.4028/www.scientific.net/MSF.503-504.781 ↗
8. Wei Q (2007) J Mater Sci 42:1709. doi: 10.1007/s10853-006-0700-910.1007/s10853-006-0700-9 ↗
9. Vevecka-Priftaj A, Böhner A, May J, Höppel HW, Göken M (2008) Mater Sci Forum 584–586:74110.4028/www.scientific.net/MSF.584-586.741 ↗
10. Blum W, Zeng XH (2009) Acta Mater 57:196610.1016/j.actamat.2008.12.041 ↗
11. Tsuji N, Shiotsuki K, Saito Y (1999) Mater Trans JIM 40:76510.2320/matertrans1989.40.765 ↗
12. Slámová M, Homola P, Karlík M, Cieslar M, Ohara Y, Tsuji N (2006) Mater Sci Forum 519–521:122710.4028/www.scientific.net/MSF.519-521.1227 ↗
13. Hausöl T, Höppel HW, Göken M (2010) J Phys: Conference Series, ICSMA 15 (accepted)
14. Tylecote RF, Howd D, Furmidge JE (1958) Br Weld J 5:21
15. Vaidyanath LR, Nicholas MG, Milner DR (1959) Br Weld J 6:13
16. Cave JR, Williams JD (1973) J Inst Met 101:203
17. Banerjee SK, Dev SC (1975) Trans Ind Inst Met 28:398
18. Wright PK, Snow DA, Tay CK (1978) Met Technol 1:2410.1179/mt.1978.5.1.24 ↗
19. Li L, Nagai K, Yin F (2008) Sci Technol Adv Mater 9:1
20. Oliver WC, Pharr GM (1992) J Mater Res 7:156410.1557/JMR.1992.1564 ↗
21. Hay JL, Pharr GM (2000) ASM Handbook 8:232
22. Lee SH, Saito Y, Tsuji N, Utsunomiya H, Sakai T (2002) Scripta Mater 46:28110.1016/S1359-6462(01)01239-8 ↗
23. Abbadi M, Hähner P, Zeghloul A (2002) Mater Sci Eng A 337:19410.1016/S0921-5093(02)00036-9 ↗
24. Wen W, Morris JG (2003) Mater Sci Eng A 354:27910.1016/S0921-5093(03)00017-0 ↗