Mechanical property and hydrothermal aging of injection molded jute/polypropylene composites
Source abstract
Abstract
This study discussed the effects of jute fiber content and hot water immersion on the tensile properties of jute fiber reinforced polypropylene (PP) composites. The jute/PP composite with different fiber contents was molded by injection molding by dry-blending of jute/PP and neat PP pellets in various mix ratios. Firstly, the quasi-static tensile test was performed. Then the specimens were aged in hot distilled water at 80 °C. After the fixed periods of aging, the changed weight and the tensile properties were investigated. It is found that with the increase of the jute fiber content, the tensile modulus is increased lineally. However, referring to the tensile strength, it is increased firstly followed by a decreased when the jute weight percent is over 30. Additionally, it is found that the weight gain by water absorption was significantly affected by the fiber content. The specimens with the jute fiber content of or over 30 wt% absorbed water easily and significant material loss by aging was also occurred. The tensile strength after aging decreased remarkably in these specimens with the jute fiber content of or over 30 wt%, and all the jute/PP composites showed the lower strength than neat PP after the aging of 1000 h. It is considered that the hydrophilic property of natural fiber decreases the resistance of the composite in humidity environment.
Source: openaire · Quality: candidate unverified · Source record ↗
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Natural Fiber Reinforced Composites · Polymer Nanocomposites and Properties · Polymer crystallization and properties
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
References (21)
Show source-provided references
1. Okubo K, Fujii T, Yamamoto Y (2004) Composites A 35:37710.1016/j.compositesa.2003.09.017 ↗
2. Arbelaiz A, Fernández B, Ramos JA, Retegi A, Llano-Ponte R, Mondragon I (2005) Compos Sci Technol 65:158210.1016/j.compscitech.2005.01.008 ↗
3. Doan TTL, Gao SL, Mäder E (2006) Compos Sci Technol 66:95210.1016/j.compscitech.2005.08.009 ↗
4. Park JM, Quang ST, Hwang BS, DeVries KL (2006) Compos Sci Technol 66:268610.1016/j.compscitech.2006.03.014 ↗
5. Doan TTL, Brodowsky H, Mäder E (2007) Compos Sci Technol 67:270710.1016/j.compscitech.2007.02.011 ↗
6. Madsen B, Hoffmeyer P, Thomsen AB, Lilholt H (2007) Composites A 38:219410.1016/j.compositesa.2007.06.001 ↗
7. Madsen B, Hoffmeyer P, Lilholt H (2007) Composites A 38:220410.1016/j.compositesa.2007.06.002 ↗
8. Park JM, Kim PG, Jang JH, Wang Z, Hwang BS, DeVries KL (2008) Composites Part B 39:104210.1016/j.compositesb.2007.11.004 ↗
9. Sgriccia N, Hawley MC, Misra M (2008) Composites A 39:163210.1016/j.compositesa.2008.07.007 ↗
10. Mohd Ishak ZA, Ariffin A, Senawi R (2001) Eur Polym J 37:163510.1016/S0014-3057(01)00033-7 ↗
11. DiBenedetto AT (2001) Mater Sci Eng A 302:7410.1016/S0921-5093(00)01357-5 ↗
12. Yilmaz T, Sinmazcelik T (2010) J Mater Sci 45:399. doi: 10.1007/s10853-009-3954-110.1007/s10853-009-3954-1 ↗
13. Bledzki AK, Gassan J, Theis S (1998) Mech Compos Mater 34(6):56310.1007/BF02254666 ↗
14. Thwe MM, Liao K (2002) Composites A 33(1):4310.1016/S1359-835X(01)00071-9 ↗
15. Tajvidi M, Najafi SK, Moteei N (2006) J Appl Polym Sci 99:219910.1002/app.21892 ↗
16. Tajvidi M, Ebrahimi GJ (2003) Appl Polym Sci 88:94110.1002/app.12029 ↗
17. Yadav P, Nema A, Varghese S, Nema SK (1999) Polym Eng Sci 39:155010.1002/pen.11548 ↗
18. Mishra S, Naik JBJ (1998) Appl Polym Sci 68:68110.1002/(SICI)1097-4628(19980425)68:4<681::AID-APP20>3.0.CO;2-T ↗
19. Pothan LA, Thomas SJ (2004) Appl Polym Sci 91:385610.1002/app.13586 ↗
20. Ohta T, Takai Y, Leong YW, Hamada H (2009) Polym Polym Compos 17(8)10.1177/096739110901700803 ↗
21. Unpublished research report, Hamada Laboratory, Kyoto Institute of Technology