Mechanical behavior of A265 single fibers
Source abstract
Abstract
The mechanical behavior of A265 high-performance fibers was experimentally investigated at both low and high strain rates. Axial, transverse, and torsional experiments were performed to measure the five material constants on a single fiber assumed as a linear, transversely isotropic material. In order to determine the tensile response of the fiber at high rates, a modified Kolsky tensile bar, also known as a split Hopkinson tension bar (SHTB) for single-fiber tests, was used. The diameter of each fiber was measured individually using a high-resolution scanning electron microscope for accurate stress calculation. A pulse shaper technique was adopted to generate a smooth and constant-amplitude incident pulse to produce deformation in the fiber specimen at a nearly constant strain rate. The tensile strength of the fiber exhibits both rate and gage-length effects.
Source: openaire · Quality: candidate unverified · Source record ↗
Research context
OpenAlex topics: High-Velocity Impact and Material Behavior · Energetic Materials and Combustion · Electromagnetic Launch and Propulsion Technology
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
References (27)
Show source-provided references
1. Yang HH (1992) Kevlar aramid fiber. John Wiley & Sons, New York, NY
2. Morton WE, Hearle JWS (1993) Physical properties of textile fibres. The Textile Institute, UK
3. Wang Y, Xia Y (1998) Compos Part A Appl Sci 29A:141110.1016/S1359-835X(98)00038-4 ↗
4. Shim VPW, Lim CT, Foo KJ (2001) Int J Impact Eng 25:110.1016/S0734-743X(00)00038-5 ↗
5. Creasy TS (2002) J Compos Mater 36:18310.1177/0021998302036002517 ↗
6. Languerand DL, Zhang H, Murthy NS, Ramesh KT, Sanoz F (2009) Mater Sci Eng A 500:21610.1016/j.msea.2008.09.075 ↗
7. Cheng M, Chen W (2005) J Eng Mater-T ASME 127:19710.1115/1.1857937 ↗
8. Kawabata S (1990) J Text Inst 81:43210.1080/00405009008658721 ↗
9. Singletary J, Davis H, Ramasubramanian MK, Knoff W, Toney M (2000) J Mater Sci 35:573. doi:https://doi.org/10.1023/A:100476402456810.1023/A:1004764024568 ↗
10. Cheng M, Chen W, Weerasooriya T (2004) Int J Solids Struct 42:621510.1016/j.ijsolstr.2004.05.016 ↗
11. Tsai CL, Daniel IM (1999) Exp Mech 39:28410.1007/BF02329806 ↗
12. Sirichaisit J, Young RJ (1999) Polymer 40:342110.1016/S0032-3861(98)00561-8 ↗
13. Kitagawa T, Yabuki K, Young RJ (2001) Polymer 42:210110.1016/S0032-3861(00)00571-1 ↗
14. Li CT, Tietz J (1985) J Am Ceram Soc 68(8):C20210.1111/j.1151-2916.1985.tb10183.x ↗
15. Turek DE (1993) Polym Eng Sci 33(6):32810.1002/pen.760330604 ↗
16. Hadley DW, Ward IM, Ward J (1965) Proc R Soc A 285(1401):275
17. Pinnock PR, Ward IM, Wolfe JM (1966) Proc R Soc A 291(1425):267
18. Phoenix SL, Skelton J (1974) Text Res J 44:93410.1177/004051757404401203 ↗
19. McEwen E (1949) Philos Mag 40(303):45410.1080/14786444908521733 ↗
20. Kolsky H (1949) Proc Phys Soc B 62:67610.1088/0370-1301/62/11/302 ↗
21. Gray G (2000) In: Kuhn H, Medlin D (eds) Classic split-Hopkinson pressure bar testing ASM handbook, vol 8. Material Park, OH
22. Gray G, Blumenthal WR (2000) In: Kuhn H, Medlin D (eds) Split-Hopkinson pressure bar testing of soft materials ASM handbook, vol 8. Material Park, OH
23. Karl FG (1975) Wave motion in elastic solids. Oxford University Press
24. Thomason JL, Kalinka G (2001) Compos Appl Sci Manuf 32:8510.1016/S1359-835X(00)00122-6 ↗
25. Meretz S, Auersch W, Marotzke C, Schulz E, Hampe A (1993) Compos Sci Technol 48:28510.1016/0266-3538(93)90145-7 ↗
26. Frew DJ, Forrestal MJ, Chen W (2002) Exp Mech 42:9310.1007/BF02411056 ↗
27. Frew DJ, Forrestal MJ, Chen W (2005) Exp Mech 45:18610.1007/BF02428192 ↗