Effect of electrophoretically deposited carbon nanotubes on the interface of carbon fiber reinforced epoxy composite
Source abstract
Abstract
The interface between reinforcing fiber and matrix is a crucial element in composite performance. Homogeneous and interconnected carbon nanotubes (CNTs) were deposited onto the surface of carbon fibers to produce multiscale reinforcement by electrophoretic deposition (EPD). Single fiber tensile tests showed that the tensile strength and Weibull modulus of the resulting multiscale materials were increased by 16 and 41%, respectively. Compared with as-received carbon fibers, CNTs-deposited carbon fibers provided the decreased surface energy by 20% and the increased adhesion work by 22% using modified Wilhelmy method. Results from single fiber pull-out testing showed that a significant improvement (up to 68.8%) of interfacial shear strength was obtained for the composites containing by CNTs/Carbon fiber multiscale reinforcement. All results strongly suggest that EPD process can provide a feasible platform for improving interface properties of advanced composites.
Source: openaire · Quality: candidate unverified · Source record ↗
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Fiber-reinforced polymer composites · Graphene research and applications · Electrophoretic Deposition in Materials Science
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
References (24)
Show source-provided references
1. Chand S (2000) J Mater Sci 35:1303. doi: 10.1023/A:100478030148910.1023/A:1004780301489 ↗
2. Paiva M, Zhou B, Fernando K, Lin Y, Kennedy J, Sun YP (2004) Carbon 42:284910.1016/j.carbon.2004.06.031 ↗
3. Liao L, Wang X, Fang P, Liew KM, Pan C (2011) ACS Appl Mater Inter 3:53410.1021/am101114t ↗
4. Thostenson ET, Li C, Chou W (2005) Compos Sci Technol 65:49110.1016/j.compscitech.2004.11.003 ↗
5. Qian H, Greenhalgh ES, Shaffer MSP, Bismarck A (2010) J Mater Chem 20:475110.1039/c000041h ↗
6. Thostenson ET, Li W, Wang D, Ren Z, Chou TW (2002) J Appl Phys 91:603410.1063/1.1466880 ↗
7. Naito K, Yang JM, Tanaka Y, Kagawa Y (2008) Appl Phys Lett 92:23191210.1063/1.2944258 ↗
8. Zhang FH, Wang RG, He XD, Wang C, Ren LN (2009) J Mater Sci 44:3574. doi: 10.1007/s10853-009-3484-x10.1007/s10853-009-3484-x ↗
9. Vivet A, Doudou BB, Poilâne C, Chen J, Ayachi MH (2011) J Mater Sci 46:1322. doi: 10.1007/s10853-010-4919-010.1007/s10853-010-4919-0 ↗
10. Boccaccini AR, Cho J, Roether JA, Thomas BJC, Minay EJ, Shaffer MSP (2006) Carbon 44:314910.1016/j.carbon.2006.06.021 ↗
11. Bekyarova E, Thostenson ET, Yu A, Kim H, Gao J, Tang J, Hahn HT, Chou TW, Itkis ME, Haddon RC (2007) Langmuir 23:397010.1021/la062743p ↗
12. Rodriguez AJ, Guzman ME, Lim CS, Minaie B (2010) Carbon 48:325610.1016/j.carbon.2010.05.018 ↗
13. Schaefer JD, Rodriguez AJ, Guzman ME, Lim CS, Minaie B (2011) Carbon 49:275010.1016/j.carbon.2011.02.070 ↗
14. Lee W, Lee SB, Choi O, Yi JW, Um MK, Byun JH, Thostenson ET, Chou TW (2010) J Mater Sci 46:2359. doi: 10.1007/s10853-010-5082-310.1007/s10853-010-5082-3 ↗
15. Zhang J, Zhuang R, Liu J, Mäder E, Heinrich G, Gao S (2010) Carbon 48:227310.1016/j.carbon.2010.03.001 ↗
16. Shaffer MSP, Fan X, Windle A (1998) Carbon 36:160310.1016/S0008-6223(98)00130-4 ↗
17. Hu H, Yu A, Kim E, Zhao B, Itkis ME, Bekyarova E, Haddon RC (2005) J Phys Chem B 109:1152010.1021/jp050781w ↗
18. Naito K, Tanaka Y, Yang JM, Kagawa Y (2008) Carbon 46:18910.1016/j.carbon.2007.11.001 ↗
19. Miller B, Muri P, Rebenfeld L (1987) Compos Sci Technol 28:1710.1016/0266-3538(87)90059-5 ↗
20. Laachachi A, Vivet A, Nouet G, Doudou BB, Poilâne C, Chen J (2008) Mater Lett 62:39410.1016/j.matlet.2007.05.044 ↗
21. Zhao ZG, Ci LJ, Cheng HM, Bai JB (2005) Carbon 43:65110.1016/j.carbon.2004.10.010 ↗
22. Qian H, Bismarck A, Greenhalgh ES, Shaffer MSP (2010) Carbon 48:27710.1016/j.carbon.2009.09.029 ↗
23. Zhao F, Huang Y (2011) J Mater Chem 21:286710.1039/c0jm03919e ↗
24. Qian H, Bismarck A, Greenhalgh ES, Shaffer MSP (2010) Compos Sci Technol 70:39310.1016/j.compscitech.2009.11.014 ↗