Studies on ac response of zinc oxide pellets
Source abstract
Abstract
The ac responses of the ZnO pellets have been studied by ac measurements (impedance, capacitance and phase angle) over the temperature range 300–435 K. The ac conductivity of the ZnO pellets is observed to be proportional to ωs, where ω is the angular frequency and the exponent s is a temperature- and frequency-dependent parameter. Based on the existing theories of ac conduction, it has been concluded that for low frequency region (20 Hz–2 kHz), the dominant conduction mechanism in the ZnO pellets is multihopping at all temperatures, whereas for high frequency region (500 kHz–2 MHz), the small polaron tunneling model is the dominant mechanism in the pellets. Activation energies for ac conduction processes are estimated to be in the range of 0.028–0.277 eV which are found to vary with the frequency of the ac signal. These results are found to be consistent with the hopping model. The ac capacitance and the dielectric loss tangent are found to be dependent on both frequency and temperature. Such dependences have been explained taking into account the equivalent circuit model comprising a frequency-independent capacitive element in parallel with a temperature-dependent resistive element, both in series with a low value resistance. Impedance spectroscopy studies show single semicircular arcs in the complex impedance spectra at all temperatures in the range 300–435 K, with their centres lying below the real axis at a particular angle of depression indicating a multirelaxation behaviour in the pellets.
Source: openaire · Quality: candidate unverified · Source record ↗
Research context
OpenAlex topics: ZnO doping and properties · Gas Sensing Nanomaterials and Sensors · Transition Metal Oxide Nanomaterials
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
References (35)
Show source-provided references
1. Clarke DR (1999) J Am Ceram Soc 82:48510.1111/j.1151-2916.1999.tb01793.x ↗
2. Viswanath RN, Ramasamy S, Ramamoorthy R, Jayavel P, Nagarajan T (1995) Nanostruct Mater 6:993. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/0965-9773(95)00229-410.1016/0965-9773(95)00229-4 ↗
3. Saito S, Miyayama M, Koumoto K, Yanagida H (1985) J Am Ceram Soc 68:40. doi: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1151-2916.1985.tb15248.x10.1111/j.1151-2916.1985.tb15248.x ↗
4. Sahay PP, Tewari S, Jha S, Shamsuddin M (2005) J Mat Sci 40:4791. doi: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10853-005-0519-910.1007/s10853-005-0519-9 ↗
5. Greuter F, Blatter G (1990) Semicond Sci Technol 5:11110.1088/0268-1242/5/2/001 ↗
6. Dong LF, Cui ZL, Zhang ZK (1997) Nanostruct Mater 8:815. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/S0965-9773(98)00005-110.1016/S0965-9773(98)00005-1 ↗
7. Van De Pol FCM (1990) Ceram Bull 69:1959
8. Jones A, Jones TA, Mann B, Griffith JG (1984) Sens Actuators 5:75. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/0250-6874(84)87008-010.1016/0250-6874(84)87008-0 ↗
9. Baruwati B, Kumar DK, Manorama SV (2006) Sens Actuators B 119:676. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.snb.2006.01.02810.1016/j.snb.2006.01.028 ↗
10. Arshak K, Gaiden I (2005) Mater Sci Eng B 118:44. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.mseb.2004.12.06110.1016/j.mseb.2004.12.061 ↗
11. Cheng XL, Zhao H, Huo LH, Gao S, Zhao JG (2004) Sens Actuators B 102:248. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.snb.2004.04.08010.1016/j.snb.2004.04.080 ↗
12. Basu S, Dutta A (1994) Sens Actuators B 22:83. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/0925-4005(94)87004-710.1016/0925-4005(94)87004-7 ↗
13. Ondo-Ndong R, Ferblantier G, Pascal-Delannoy F, Boyer A, Foucaran A (2003) Microelectron J 34:1087. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/S0026-2692(03)00198-810.1016/S0026-2692(03)00198-8 ↗
14. Nagaraju DJ, Krupanidhi SB (2006) Mater Sci Eng B 133:70. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.mseb.2006.05.00510.1016/j.mseb.2006.05.005 ↗
15. Sahay PP, Tewari S, Nath RK (2007) Cryst Res Technol 42:723. doi: https://doi.org/10.1002/crat.20061089510.1002/crat.200610895 ↗
16. Hong YW, Kim JH (2004) Ceram Int 30:1307. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ceramint.2003.12.02610.1016/j.ceramint.2003.12.026 ↗
17. Andres-Verges M, West AR (1997) J Electroceramics 1:12510.1023/A:1009906315725 ↗
18. Jose J, Khadar MA (1999) Nanostruct Mater 11:1091. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/S0965-9773(99)00399-210.1016/S0965-9773(99)00399-2 ↗
19. Abram EJ, Sinclair DC, West AR (2003) J Electroceramics 10:16510.1023/B:JECR.0000011215.56084.87 ↗
20. Klug HP, Alexander LE (1974) X-ray diffraction procedures for polycrystalline and amorphous materials. Wiley, New York
21. Pollak M, Geballe TH (1961) Phys Rev 122:1742. doi: https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRev.122.174210.1103/PhysRev.122.1742 ↗
22. Pollak M (1971) Philos Mag 23:519. doi: https://doi.org/10.1080/1478643710821640210.1080/14786437108216402 ↗
23. Jonscher AKJ (1972) Non-Cryst Solids. 810:293 doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/0022-3093(72)90151-210.1016/0022-3093(72)90151-2 ↗
24. Meng LJ, Adritsck YM, Dos Santos MP (1994) Vacuum 45:19. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/0042-207X(94)90334-410.1016/0042-207X(94)90334-4 ↗
25. Goswami A, Goswami AP (1973) Thin Solid Films 16:175. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/0040-6090(73)90166-110.1016/0040-6090(73)90166-1 ↗
26. Shihub SI, Gould RD (1995) Thin Solid Films 254:187. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/0040-6090(94)06240-L10.1016/0040-6090(94)06240-L ↗
27. Saleh AM, Abu-Hilal AO, Gould RD (2003) Curr Appl Phys 3:345. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/S1567-1739(02)00243-210.1016/S1567-1739(02)00243-2 ↗
28. Amar NM, Saleh AM, Gould RD (2003) Appl Phys A 76:77. doi: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00339020130610.1007/s003390201306 ↗
29. Gould RD, Din M (1999) Superficies y Vacio 9:230
30. Ismail BB, Gould RD (1996) Proc SPIE 2780:46. doi: https://doi.org/10.1117/12.23820010.1117/12.238200 ↗
31. Abu-Hilal AO, Gould RD, Abu-Taha MI, Saleh AM (2007) Int J Mod Phys B 21:55. doi: https://doi.org/10.1142/S021797920703587X10.1142/S021797920703587X ↗
32. Choudhary RNP, Bhunia U (2002) J Mater Sci 37:5177. doi: https://doi.org/10.1023/A:102101941253310.1023/A:1021019412533 ↗
33. Macdonald JR, Johnson WB (2005). In: Barsoukov E, Macdonald JR (eds) Impedance spectroscopy: theory, experiment and applications. Wiley-Interscience, NJ10.1002/0471716243.ch1 ↗
34. Chandra Bose A, Balaya P, Thangadurai P, Ramasamy S (2003) J Phys Chem Solids 64:659. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/S0022-3697(02)00368-210.1016/S0022-3697(02)00368-2 ↗
35. Lal M, Batham PK, Goyal N (1995) Sol Energy Mater Solar Cells 36:111. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/0927-0248(94)00166-P10.1016/0927-0248(94)00166-P ↗