journal article·2009-03

Comprehensive analyses of syntactic foam behaviour in deepwater environment

François Grosjean, Nadège Bouchonneau, Dominique Choqueuse, Valérie Sauvant-Moynot

Journal of Materials Science· Volume 44· Issue 6
Publisher page

Abstract

Over the past 10 years, numerous studies were performed to better understand the behaviour of the glass syntactic foams used as thermal insulation of pipes for deepwater production. The obtained results outlined some specific behaviour of polymeric syntactic foams reinforced by glass microballoons in service conditions: both water uptake and mechanical stress have a key impact on thermal properties. This article focuses first on the wet behaviour of glass syntactic foams. The effect of water is investigated to better model the nature of water diffusing in syntactic foams with and without a topcoat protection. Secondly, the effect of hydrostatic pressure on coated structure is addressed by using a confined compression test. As polymer material is bonded to the steel surface, it is not submitted to pure hydrostatic loading but to non-spherical loading in the vicinity of the pipe. The confined compression test is then chosen to represent these non-spherical loadings of material. The rupture of glass microballoons is monitored by acoustic emission for different matrices and attempts are made to quantify the resulting acoustic emission signals by comparison with prior tomography results. These experimental analyses provide a better understanding of the main factors affecting the functional properties of syntactic foams.
Source: openaire · Quality: candidate unverified · Source record ↗

Research context

OpenAlex topics: Mechanical Behavior of Composites · Asphalt Pavement Performance Evaluation · Infrastructure Maintenance and Monitoring

SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.

References (17)

Show source-provided references
1. Kochetkov VA, Maksimov RD (1996) Mech Comp Mat 32(1):61
2. Sauvant-Moynot V, Gimenez N, Sautereau H (2006) J Mater Sci 47:4047. doi: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10853-006-7618-010.1007/s10853-006-7618-0 ↗
3. Gimenez N, Sauvant-Moynot N, Sautereau H (2005) In: Proceedings of offshore mechanics and Arctic engineering (OMAE2005), Halkidiki, Greece, 12–17 June 2005
4. Choqueuse D, Chomard A, Chauchot P (2004) In: Proceedings of offshore technology conference, Houston, TX, 3–6 May 2004, OTC16503
5. Choqueuse D, Chomard A, Bucherie C (2002) In: Proceedings of offshore technology conference, Houston, TX, 6–9 May 2002, OTC14115
6. Wang WT, Watkins L (2005) In: Proceeding of offshore mechanics and Arctic engineering (OMAE2005), Halkidiki, Greece, 12–17 June 2005
7. Haldane D, Van Der Graaf F, Lankhorst AM (1999) In: Proceedings of offshore technology conference, Houston, TX, 3–6 May 1999, OTC11040
8. Bouchonneau N, Sauvant-Moynot V, Grosjean F, Choqueuse D, Poncet E, Perreux D (2007) In: Proceedings of offshore technology conference, Houston, TX, 30 April–3 May 2007, OTC1879
9. Mathieu Y (2006) In: IFP forum, September 2006
10. Ayers RR, Collerain JB (2004) In: Deepstar CTR 6301, October 2004
11. Rouillon J (2002) In: Proceedings of offshore technology conference, Houston, TX, 6–9 May 2002, OTC14171
12. Okonkwo U, Uralil F, Berti E, Judd S (2005) In: Proceedings of deep offshore technology, Vittoria, Brazil, 8–10 November 2005
13. Verdu J (2000) Techniques de l’Ingenieur AM3165
14. Carter HG, Kibler KG (1978) J Compos Mater 12:11810.1177/002199837801200201 ↗
15. Lekatou A, Faidi SE, Ghidaoui D, Lyon SB, Newman RC (1997) Composites Part A 28:22310.1016/S1359-835X(96)00113-3 ↗
16. Sauvant-Moynot V, Schweitzer S, Grenier J, Duval S (2004) In: Proceedings of EUROCORR 2004, Nice, France, 12–16 September 2004
17. Adrien J, Maire E, Gimenez N, Sauvant-Moynot V (2007) Acta Mater 55:166710.1016/j.actamat.2006.10.027 ↗