journal article·2009-03

Moving finite-element mesh model for aiding spark plasma sintering in current control mode of pure ultrafine WC powder

G. Maizza, S. Grasso, Y. Sakka

Journal of Materials Science· Volume 44· Issue 5
Publisher page

Abstract

The intricate bulk and contact multiphysics of spark plasma sintering (SPS) together with the involved non-linear materials’ response make the process optimization very difficult both experimentally and computationally. The present work proposes an integrated experimental/numerical methodology, which simultaneously permits the developed SPS model to be reliably tested against experiments and to self-consistently estimate the overall set of unknown SPS contact resistances. Unique features of the proposed methodology are: (a) simulations and experiments are conducted in current control mode (SPS-CCm); (b) the SPS model couples electrothermal and displacement fields; (c) the contact multiphysics at the sliding punch/die interface is modeled during powder sintering using a moving mesh/moving boundary technique; (d) calibration and validation procedures employ both graphite compact and conductive WC powder samples. The unknown contact resistances are estimated iteratively by minimizing the deviation between predictions and on-line measurements (i.e., voltage, die surface temperature, and punch displacement) for three imposed currents (i.e., 1,900, 2,100, 2,700 A) and 20 MPa applied pressure. An excellent agreement is found between model predictions and measurements. The results show that the SPS bulk and contact multiphysics can be accurately reproduced during densification of ultrafine binderless WC powder. The results can be used to benchmark contact resistances in SPS systems applicable to graphite and conductive (WC) powder samples. The SPS bulk and contact multiphysics phenomena arising during sintering of ultrafine binderless WC powders are finally discussed. A direct correlation between sintering microstructure, sintering temperature, and heating rate is established. The developed self-consistent SPS model can be effective used as an aiding tool to design optimum SPS experiments, predict sintering microstructure, or benchmark SPS system hardware or performances.
Source: openaire · Quality: candidate unverified · Source record ↗

Research context

OpenAlex topics: Advanced ceramic materials synthesis · Advanced materials and composites · Aluminum Alloys Composites Properties

SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.

References (31)

Show source-provided references
1. Munir ZA, Anselmi-Tamburini U, Ohyanagi M (2006) J Mater Sci 41:763. doi:https://doi.org/10.1007/s1085-006-6555-210.1007/s10853-006-6555-2 ↗
2. Keum YT, Jeon JH, Auh KH (2002) J Ceram Proc Res 3:195
3. Leuenberger G, Ludwig R, Apelian D (2002) J Non-Destr Eval 21:11110.1023/A:1023885817514 ↗
4. Zhang J, Zavaliangos A, Kraemer M, Groza JR (2002) In: Lawley A, Smugeresky JE, Smith L (eds) Process modeling in powder metallurgy and particulate materials: Proceedings of the 2002 international conference on process modeling powder metallurgy and particulate materials, Newport Beach, CA, pp 208–215, 28–29 October 2002
5. Zhang J, Zavaliangos A, Groza JR (2003) In: International conference on powder metallurgy and particulate materials, Las Vegas
6. Zhang J, Zavaliangos A, Groza JR (2003) In: Cornwall RG, German RM, Messing GL (eds) Proceedings of sintering 2003, Materials Research Institute, Pennsylvania State University, University Park, PA, 14–17 September 2003
7. Zhang J, Zavaliangos A, Groza JR (2003) P/M Sci Tech Briefs 5:5
8. Zhang J (2003) Numerical simulation of sintering under electric field. PhD Thesis, Drexel University, Philadelphia, PA
9. Anselmi-Tamburini U, Garay JE, Munir ZA, Tacca A, Maglia F, Spinolo G (2004) J Mater Res 19:325510.1557/JMR.2004.0423 ↗
10. Zavaliangos A, Zhang J, Krammer M, Groza JR (2004) Mater Sci Eng A 379:21810.1016/j.msea.2004.01.052 ↗
11. Anselmi-Tamburini U, Gennari S, Garay JE, Munir ZA (2005) Mater Sci Eng A394:13910.1016/j.msea.2004.11.019 ↗
12. Anselmi-Tamburini U, Garay JE, Munir ZA (2005) Mater Sci Eng. A 407:2410.1016/j.msea.2005.06.066 ↗
13. Vanmeensel K, Laptev A, Hennicke J, Vleugels J, Van der Biest O (2005) Acta Mater 53:437910.1016/j.actamat.2005.05.042 ↗
14. Cincotti A, Locci AM, Orru’ R, Cao G (2007) AIChE J 53:70310.1002/aic.11102 ↗
15. Olevsky E, Froyen L (2006) Scr Mater 55:117510.1016/j.scriptamat.2006.07.009 ↗
16. Maizza G, Grasso S, Sakka Y, Noda T, Ohashi O (2007) Sci Tech Adv Mater 8:64410.1016/j.stam.2007.09.002 ↗
17. COMSOL Multiphyscs (2006) AC/DC Module, User’s Guide Vers.3.3a, August
18. Savvatimskiy AI (2005) Carbon 43:111510.1016/j.carbon.2004.12.027 ↗
19. Loeb AL (1954) J Am Ceram Soc 37:9610.1111/j.1551-2916.1954.tb20107.x ↗
20. Austin JB (1941) Ceram Abstr 20:45
21. Sahimi M, Tsotsis TT (1999) Ind Eng Chem Res 36:304310.1021/ie960602k ↗
22. Willims WS (1998) JOM 50:6210.1007/s11837-998-0131-y ↗
23. Reeber RR, Wang K 1999) J Am Ceram Soc 82:12910.1111/j.1151-2916.1999.tb01732.x ↗
24. Toyo Tanso Co. Ltd. Tokyo private communication
25. Holm R (1967) Electric contacts: theory and application. Springer, New York10.1007/978-3-662-06688-1 ↗
26. Nishimoto K, Saida K, Tsuduki R (2001) J Jpn Inst Met 65:74710.2320/jinstmet1952.65.8_747 ↗
27. Luo X, Chung DDL (2001) J Tribol 123:68310.1115/1.1353588 ↗
28. Xie G, Ohashi O, Yamaguchi N, Wang A (2003) Metall Mater Trans A 34:265510.1007/s11661-003-0024-1 ↗
29. Bahrami M, Culham JR, Yovanovich MM (2004) J Heat Transf 126:89610.1115/1.1795238 ↗
30. Bahrami M, Culham JR, Yovanovich MM, Schneider GE (2004) J Thermophys Heat Transf 18:21810.2514/1.2664 ↗
31. Song Q, Zhang W, Niel B (2005) Weld J 84:73