Comparing the effect of carbon-based nanofillers on the physical properties of flexible polyurethane foams
Source abstract
Abstract
Flexible polyurethane (PU) foams filled with a fixed amount of carbon-based nanofillers, in particular multiwall nanotubes and graphenes, have been studied to clarify the influence of the morphology and functional groups on the physical properties of these polymeric foams. The effect of the carbon nanoparticles on the microphase separation has been analyzed by FT-IR spectroscopy revealing a decrease in the degree of phase separation of the segments. Variations of the glass transition temperature and an improved thermal stability were observed due to the presence of the nanoparticles. The EMI shielding effectiveness of flexible PU foams has also been enhanced, in particular for FGS nanocomposite foams.
Source: openaire · Quality: candidate unverified · Source record ↗
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Polymer composites and self-healing · Polymer Nanocomposites and Properties · Electromagnetic wave absorption materials
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
References (34)
Show source-provided references
1. Tong XC (2009) Advanced Materials and Design for Electromagnetic Interference Shielding. CRC Press Taylor & Francis Group, Boca Raton, pp 215–236
2. Xu XB, Li ZM, Shi L, Bian XC, Xiang ZD (2007) Small 3(3):408. doi: 10.1002/smll.20060034810.1002/smll.200600348 ↗
3. Yan D-X, Dai K, Xiang Z-D, Li Z-M, Ji X, Zhang W-Q (2011) J Appl Polym Sci 120(5):3014. doi: 10.1002/app.3343710.1002/app.33437 ↗
4. Verdejo R, Barroso-Bujans F, Rodriguez-Perez MA, de Saja JA, Lopez-Manchado MA (2008) J Mater Chem 18(19):2221. doi: 10.1039/b718289a10.1039/b718289a ↗
5. Harikrishnan G, Lindsay CI, Arunagirinathan MA, Macosko CW (2009) ACS Appl Mater Interface 1(9):1913. doi: 10.1021/am900312310.1021/am9003123 ↗
6. Harikrishnan G, Singh SN, Kiesel E, Macosko CW (2010) Polymer 51(15):3349. doi: 10.1016/j.polymer.2010.05.01710.1016/j.polymer.2010.05.017 ↗
7. Bandarian M, Shojaei A, Rashidi AM (2011) Polym Int 60(3):475. doi: 10.1002/pi.297110.1002/pi.2971 ↗
8. Berta M, Lindsay C, Pans G, Camino G (2006) Polym Degrad Stab 91(5):1179. doi: 10.1016/j.polymdegradstab.2005.05.02710.1016/j.polymdegradstab.2005.05.027 ↗
9. Cao Y, Lai Z, Feng J, Wu P (2011) J Mater Chem 21(25):9271. doi: 10.1039/C1JM10420A10.1039/c1jm10420a ↗
10. Verdejo R, Stampfli R, Alvarez-Lainez M, Mourad S, Rodriguez-Perez MA, Bruhwiler PA, Shaffer M (2009) Compos Sci Technol 69(10):1564. doi: 10.1016/j.compscitech.2008.07.00310.1016/j.compscitech.2008.07.003 ↗
11. Yang Y, Gupta MC, Dudley KL, Lawrence RW (2005) Nano Lett 5(11):2131. doi: 10.1021/nl051375r10.1021/nl051375r ↗
12. Lee LJ, Zeng CC, Cao X, Han XM, Shen J, Xu GJ (2005) Compos Sci Technol 65(15–16):2344. doi: 10.1016/j.compscitech.2005.06.01610.1016/j.compscitech.2005.06.016 ↗
13. Klempner D, Sendijarevic V (2004) Handbook of polymeric foams and foam technology. Hanser Publishers, Munich
14. Verdejo R, Jell G, Safinia L, Bismarck A, Stevens MM, Shaffer MSP (2009) J Biomed Mater Res A 88A(1):65. doi: 10.1002/Jbm.A.3169810.1002/jbm.a.31698 ↗
15. Artavia LD, Macosko CW (1990) J Cell Plast 26(6):490. doi: 10.1177/0021955x900260060210.1177/0021955X9002600602 ↗
16. Elwell MJ, Ryan AJ, Grunbauer HJM, VanLieshout HC (1996) Polymer 37(8):1353. doi: 10.1016/0032-3861(96)81132-310.1016/0032-3861(96)81132-3 ↗
17. Creswick MW, Lee KD, Turner RB, Huber LM (1989) J Elastom Plast 21(3):179. doi: 10.1177/0095244389021003041810.1177/009524438902100304 ↗
18. Zammarano M, Kramer RH, Harris R, Ohlemiller TJ, Shields JR, Rahatekar SS, Lacerda S, Gilman JW (2008) Polym Adv Technol 19(6):588. doi: 10.1002/pat.111110.1002/pat.1111 ↗
19. Bernal MM, Lopez-Manchado MA, Verdejo R (2011) Macromol Chem Phys 212(9):971. doi: 10.1002/macp.20100074810.1002/macp.201000748 ↗
20. Singh C, Shaffer MS, Windle AH (2003) Carbon 41(2):359. doi: 10.1016/S0008-6223(02)00314-710.1016/S0008-6223(02)00314-7 ↗
21. Brodie BC (1859) Philos Trans R Soc Lond 149:249. doi: 10.1098/rstl.1859.001310.1098/rstl.1859.0013 ↗
22. Miller JA, Lin SB, Hwang KKS, Wu KS, Gibson PE, Cooper SL (1985) Macromolecules 18(1):32. doi: 10.1021/ma00143a00510.1021/ma00143a005 ↗
23. Tien YI, Wei KH (2001) Polymer 42(7):3213. doi: 10.1016/S0032-3861(00)00729-110.1016/S0032-3861(00)00729-1 ↗
24. Xia HS, Song M (2005) Soft Matter 1(5):386. doi: 10.1039/b509038e10.1039/b509038e ↗
25. Seymour RW, Estes GM, Cooper SL (1970) Macromolecules 3(5):579. doi: 10.1021/ma60017a02110.1021/ma60017a021 ↗
26. Wang CB, Cooper SL (1983) Macromolecules 16(5):775. doi: 10.1021/ma00239a01410.1021/ma00239a014 ↗
27. Chen TK, Tien YI, Wei KH (2000) Polymer 41(4):1345. doi: 10.1016/S0032-3861(99)00280-310.1016/S0032-3861(99)00280-3 ↗
28. Pei AH, Malho JM, Ruokolainen J, Zhou Q, Berglund LA (2011) Macromolecules 44(11):4422. doi: 10.1021/ma200318k10.1021/ma200318k ↗
29. Chattopadhyay DK, Webster DC (2009) Prog Polym Sci 34(10):1068. doi: 10.1016/j.progpolymsci.2009.06.00210.1016/j.progpolymsci.2009.06.002 ↗
30. Thirumal M, Khastgir D, Nando GB, Naik YP, Singha NK (2010) Polym Degrad Stab 95(6):1138. doi: 10.1016/j.polymdegradstab.2010.01.03510.1016/j.polymdegradstab.2010.01.035 ↗
31. Wang X, Hu Y, Song L, Yang H, Xing W, Lu H (2011) J Mater Chem 21(12):4222. doi: 10.1039/C0JM03710A10.1039/c0jm03710a ↗
32. Ramanathan T, Abdala AA, Stankovich S, Dikin DA, Herrera Alonso M, Piner RD, Adamson DH, Schniepp HC, Chen X, Ruoff RS, Nguyen ST, Aksay IA, Prud’Homme RK, Brinson LC (2008) Nat Nano 3(6):327. doi: 10.1038/nnano.2008.9610.1038/nnano.2008.96 ↗
33. Yu J, Jiang P, Wu C, Wang L, Wu X (2011) Polym Compos 32(10):1483. doi: 10.1002/pc.2110610.1002/pc.21106 ↗
34. Thomassin JM, Huynen I, Jerome R, Detrembleur C (2010) Polymer 51(1):115. doi: 10.1016/j.polymer.2009.11.01210.1016/j.polymer.2009.11.012 ↗