Aluminum hydroxide filled ethylene vinyl acetate (EVA) composites: effect of the interfacial compatibilizer and the particle size
Source abstract
Abstract
Ethylene vinyl acetate (EVA) copolymer was filled with aluminum hydroxide (ATH) with three different sizes of 1.8, 1.2 and 0.8 μm in various volume fractions. The effect of interfacial compatibilizer on the properties of the composites was studied by morphology observation, dynamic mechanical analysis, tensile and flame tests. The results illustrated that the incorporation of functionalized polyethylene combined with dicumyl peroxide (DCP) and the silane coupling agent led to a pronounced improvement in the tensile strength compared to the composites with ATH untreated or treated by silane coupling agent alone. It was found that good dispersion and interfacial adhesion between the ATH particles and the matrix can improve the flame properties of composites. The particle size has a great effect on the flammability of the EVA/ATH composites. ATH with smaller particle size can increase the LOI value and improve the UL-94 flammability of the composites.
Source: openaire · Quality: candidate unverified · Source record ↗
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Flame retardant materials and properties · Silicone and Siloxane Chemistry · Polymer Nanocomposites and Properties
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
References (15)
Show source-provided references
1. Shi L, Li ZM, Yang MB, Yin B, Zhou QM, Wang JH (2005) Polym-plast Technol Eng 44:132310.1080/03602550500208145 ↗
2. Shi L, Li ZM, Xie BH, Wang JH, Tian CR, Yang MB (2006) Polym Int 55:86210.1002/pi.2021 ↗
3. Lu SY, Hamerton I (2002) Prog Polym Sci 27:166110.1016/S0079-6700(02)00018-7 ↗
4. Sen AK, Mukheriee B, Bhattacharya AS, Sanghi LK, De PP, Bhowmick K (1991) J Appl Polym Sci 43:167310.1002/app.1991.070430910 ↗
5. France AD, Ferry L, Cuesta J. M. Lopez, Crespy A (2000) Polym Int 49:110110.1002/1097-0126(200010)49:10<1101::AID-PI523>3.0.CO;2-5 ↗
6. Camino G, Maffezzoli A, Braglia M, De Lazzaro M, Zammarano M (2001) Polym Degrad Stab 74:45710.1016/S0141-3910(01)00167-7 ↗
7. Qiu LZ, Xie RC, Ding P, Qu BJ (2003) Compos Struct 62:39110.1016/j.compstruct.2003.09.010 ↗
8. Li ZZ, Qu BJ (2003) Polym Degrad Stab 81:40110.1016/S0141-3910(03)00123-X ↗
9. Gheysari D, Behjat A (2002) Eur Polym J 38:108710.1016/S0014-3057(01)00281-6 ↗
10. Preston CML, Amarasinghe G, Hopewell JL, Shanks RA, Mathys Z (2002) Polym Degrad Stab 43:6707
11. Zhang XG, Guo F, Chen JF, Wang GQ, Liu H (2005) Polym Degrad Stab 87:41110.1016/j.polymdegradstab.2004.08.013 ↗
12. Hippi U, Mattila J, Korhonen M, Seppala J (2003) Polymer 44:119310.1016/S0032-3861(02)00856-X ↗
13. Chiang WY, Hu CH (2001) Composites: Part A 32:51710.1016/S1359-835X(00)00129-9 ↗
14. Ren DS, Wang JQ (1999) Surf Interface Anal 28:17010.1002/(SICI)1096-9918(199908)28:1<170::AID-SIA600>3.0.CO;2-J ↗
15. Liauw CM, Lees GC, Hurst SJ, Rothon RN, Ai S (1998) Composites: Part A 29A:131310.1016/S1359-835X(97)00132-2 ↗