Mechanical behavior and failure process during compressive and shear deformation of honeycomb composite at elevated temperatures
Source abstract
Abstract
The mechanical behavior and failure mechanism of honeycomb composite consisting of Nomex honeycomb core and 2024Al alloy facesheets were investigated. The compressive and shear deformation behaviors of honeycomb composite were analyzed at temperatures ranged 25–300°C. The compressive and shear strengths of honeycomb composite decreased continuously with increasing temperature up to 300°C. The stress-strain curves obtained from the compressive and shear tests showed that the stress increased to a peak value and then decreased rapidly to a steady state value, which is nearly constant up to failure with increasing strain. The compressive deformation behavior of honeycomb composite was progressed by an elastic and plastic buckling of cell walls, debonding fracture at the interfaces of cell walls, and followed by a fracture of resin layer on cell walls. The shear deformation of honeycomb composite was progressed by an elastic shear deformation, plastic shear deformation, fracture of resin layer on cell walls, and followed by debonding fracture at core/facesheet interfaces. The shear strength of honeycomb composite showed strong anisotropy dependent on the loading direction. The shear strength in longitudinal direction was about 1.4 times higher compared to that in transversal direction due to the different thickness of cell walls mainly loaded during the shear deformation.
Source: openaire · Quality: candidate unverified · Source record ↗
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Cellular and Composite Structures · Innovative concrete reinforcement materials · Fiber-reinforced polymer composites
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
References (13)
Show source-provided references
1. J. A. JACOB and T. F. KILDUFF, “Engineering Materials Technology” (Prentice-Hall, Englewood Cliffs, NJ, 1985).
2. J. S. HUNG and L. J. GIBSON, Acta metall. Mater. 39(7) (1991) 1617.10.1016/0956-7151(91)90249-Z ↗
3. J. H. LEE, J. B. CHOI and K. CHOI, J. Mater. Sci. 31 (1996) 4105.10.1007/BF00352675 ↗
4. K. F. KARLSSON and B. T. ASTROM, Composites part A 28A (1997) 97.10.1016/S1359-835X(96)00098-X ↗
5. M. G. BADER, “In Processing and Fabrication Technology, Delaware Composites Encyclopedia,”Vol. 3 (Technomic, Lancaster, PA 1990) p. 105.
6. S. KELSEY, R. A. GELLATLY and B. W. CLARK, Aircraft Engineering (October 1958) 294.10.1108/eb033026 ↗
7. J. ZHANG and M. F. ASHBY, Int. Mech. Sci. 34(6) (1992)475.10.1016/0020-7403(92)90013-7 ↗
8. S. P. TIMOSHENKO and J. M. GERE, “Theory of Elastic Stability” (McGraw-Hill, New York, 1961).
9. R. J. ROARK and W. C. YOUNG, “Formulas For Stress and Strain” (McGraw-Hill Book Company, 1975).
10. P. SHULESHKO, Proc. Am. Soc. Civil Eng. 90(3) (1964).10.1061/JMCEA3.0000485 ↗
11. S. S. LABANA, “Chemistry and Properties of Cosslinked Polymers” (Academic Press, 1977).
12. H. E. GOLDSTEIN, ACS Org. Coat. Plast. Chem. 28(1) (1968) 131.
13. B. S. MARKS and L. RUBIN, ibid. 28(1) (1968) 94.