Progress in Ni-based anode materials for direct hydrocarbon solid oxide fuel cells
Source abstract
Abstract
Ni-based anode materials of solid oxide fuel cells (SOFCs) are susceptible to carbon deposition and deactivation in direct hydrocarbon fuels, greatly limiting the commercialization. Extensive studies on finding new alternative anode materials have been developed; however, new problems such as low electrochemical performance and complex cell preparation process destroyed the further research passion of Ni-free anode materials. Considering the superior catalytic activity and mature technology of Ni-based anode materials, a large number of recent research results proved that it is still important and promising to solve the carbon coking of Ni-based anode materials. In this review, progress in four typically promising Ni-based anode materials free from carbon coking has been summarized, including the noble metals, ceria, Ba-containing oxides and titanium oxide. Correspondingly, the mechanisms that improve the carbon tolerance of Ni-based modified SOFCs anodes are clearly concluded, providing the materials and theoretical basis for the use of direct hydrocarbon SOFCs as early as possible.
Source: openaire · Quality: candidate unverified · Source record ↗
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Advancements in Solid Oxide Fuel Cells · Electronic and Structural Properties of Oxides · Catalysis and Oxidation Reactions
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
References (100+)
Show source-provided references
1. Chen H, Wang F, Wang W, Chen D, Li SD, Shao Z (2016) H2S poisoning effect and ways to improve sulfur tolerance of nickel cermet anodes operating on carbonaceous fuels. Appl Energy 179:765–77710.1016/j.apenergy.2016.07.028 ↗
2. Liu M, Lynch ME, Blinn K, Alamgir FM, Choi YM (2011) Rational SOFC material design: new advances and tools. Mater Today 14:534–54610.1016/S1369-7021(11)70279-6 ↗
3. He H, Hill JM (2007) Carbon deposition on Ni/YSZ composites exposed to humidified methane. Appl Catal A Gen 317:284–29210.1016/j.apcata.2006.10.040 ↗
4. Koh JH, Yoo YS, Park JW, Lim HC (2002) Carbon deposition and cell performance of Ni-YSZ anode support SOFC with methane fuel. Solid State Ion 149:157–16610.1016/S0167-2738(02)00243-6 ↗
5. Khan MS, Lee SB, Song RH, Lee JW, Lim TH, Park SJ (2016) Fundamental mechanisms involved in the degradation of nickel–yttria stabilized zirconia (Ni–YSZ) anode during solid oxide fuel cells operation: a review. Ceram Int 42:35–4810.1016/j.ceramint.2015.09.006 ↗
6. Sun C, Stimming U (2007) Recent anode advances in solid oxide fuel cells. J Power Sources 171:247–26010.1016/j.jpowsour.2007.06.086 ↗
7. Mcintosh S, Gorte RJ (2004) Direct hydrocarbon solid oxide fuel cells. Chem Rev 104:4845–486610.1021/cr020725g ↗
8. Boldrin P, Ruiztrejo E, Mermelstein J, Menendez JMB, Reina TR, Brandon NP (2016) Strategies for carbon and sulfur tolerant solid oxide fuel cell materials, incorporating lessons from heterogeneous catalysis. Chem Rev 116:13633–1368410.1021/acs.chemrev.6b00284 ↗
9. Wang W, Su C, Wu Y, Ran R, Shao Z (2013) Progress in solid oxide fuel cells with nickel-based anodes operating on methane and related fuels. Chem Rev 113:8104–815110.1021/cr300491e ↗
10. Shaikh SPS, Muchtar A, Somalu MR (2015) A review on the selection of anode materials for solid-oxide fuel cells. Renew Sustain Energy Rev 51:1–810.1016/j.rser.2015.05.069 ↗
11. Jiang SP, Chan SH (2004) A review of anode materials development in solid oxide fuel cells. J Mater Sci 39:4405–4439. https://doi.org/10.1023/B:JMSC.0000034135.52164.6b10.1023/B:JMSC.0000034135.52164.6b ↗
12. Niakolas DK, Ouweltjes JP, Rietveld G, Dracopoulos V, Neophytides SG (2010) Au-doped Ni/GDC as a new anode for SOFCs operating under rich CH4 internal steam reforming. Int J Hydrog Energy 35:7898–790410.1016/j.ijhydene.2010.05.038 ↗
13. Li M, Hua B, Luo J, Jiang SP, Pu J, Chi B, Jian L (2015) Carbon-tolerant Ni-based cermet anodes modified by proton conducting yttrium- and ytterbium-doped barium cerates for direct methane solid oxide fuel cells. J Mater Chem A3:21609–2161710.1039/C5TA06488K ↗
14. Cheng H, Feng S, Wei T, Lu X, Yao W, Li G, Zhou Z (2014) Effects of noble metal-doping on Ni/La2O3–ZrO2 catalysts for dry reforming of coke oven gas. Int J Hydrog Energy 39:12604–1261210.1016/j.ijhydene.2014.06.120 ↗
15. Hua B, Zhang W, Li M, Wang X, Chi B, Pu J, Li J (2014) Improved microstructure and performance of Ni-based anode for intermediate temperature solid oxide fuel cells. J Power Sources 247:170–17710.1016/j.jpowsour.2013.08.060 ↗
16. Kan H, Lee H (2010) Enhanced stability of Ni–Fe/GDC solid oxide fuel cell anodes for dry methane fuel. Catal Commun 12:36–3910.1016/j.catcom.2010.07.014 ↗
17. Nikolla E, Schwan KJ, Linic S (2007) Promotion of the long-term stability of reforming Ni catalysts by surface alloying. J Catal 250:85–9310.1016/j.jcat.2007.04.020 ↗
18. Park EW, Moon H, Park MS, Sang HH (2009) Fabrication and characterization of Cu–Ni–YSZ SOFC anodes for direct use of methane via Cu-electroplating. Int J Hydrog Energy 34:5537–554510.1016/j.ijhydene.2009.04.060 ↗
19. Hua B, Li M, Pu J, Chi B, Jian L (2014) BaZrCeYYbO enhanced coking-free on-cell reforming for direct-methane solid oxide fuel cells. J Mater Chem A 2:12576–1258210.1039/C4TA01989J ↗
20. Asamoto M, Miyake S, Sugihara K, Yahiro H (2009) Improvement of Ni/SDC anode by alkaline earth metal oxide addition for direct methane–solid oxide fuel cells. Electrochem Commun 11:1508–151110.1016/j.elecom.2009.05.042 ↗
21. Guo J, Lou H, Mo L, Zheng X (2010) The reactivity of surface active carbonaceous species with CO2 and its role on hydrocarbon conversion reactions. J Mol Catal A Chem 316:1–710.1016/j.molcata.2009.09.023 ↗
22. Li J, Liu G, Croiset E (2017) Two-dimensional mechanistic solid oxide fuel cell model with revised detailed methane reforming mechanism. Electrochim Acta 249:216–22610.1016/j.electacta.2017.08.017 ↗
23. Kim T, Liu G, Boaro M, Lee SI, Vohs JM, Gorte RJ, Almadhi OH, Dabbousi BO (2006) A study of carbon formation and prevention in hydrocarbon-fueled SOFC. J Power Sources 155:231–23810.1016/j.jpowsour.2005.05.001 ↗
24. Li H, Tian Y, Wang Z, Qie F, Li Y (2012) An all perovskite direct methanol solid oxide fuel cell with high resistance to carbon formation at the anode. RSC Adv 2:3857–386310.1039/c2ra01256a ↗
25. Hu B, Keane M, Patil K, Mahapatra MK, Pasaogullari U, Singh P (2014) Direct methanol utilization in intermediate temperature liquid-tin anode solid oxide fuel cells. Appl Energy 134:342–34810.1016/j.apenergy.2014.08.030 ↗
26. Qu J, Wang W, Chen Y, Wang F, Ran R, Shao Z (2015) Ethylene glycol as a new sustainable fuel for solid oxide fuel cells with conventional nickel-based anodes. Appl Energy 148:1–910.1016/j.apenergy.2015.03.051 ↗
27. Won JY, Sohn HJ, Song RH, Woo SI (2009) Glycerol as a bioderived sustainable fuel for solid-oxide fuel cells with internal reforming. ChemSusChem 2:1028–103110.1002/cssc.200900170 ↗
28. Wang W, Qu J, Shao Z (2017) Recent advances in the development of anode materials for solid oxide fuel cells utilizing liquid oxygenated hydrocarbon fuels: a mini review. Energy Technol. https://doi.org/10.1002/ente.20170073810.1002/ente.201700738 ↗
29. Girona K, Laurencin J, Fouletier J, Lefebvre-Joud F (2012) Carbon deposition in CH4/CO2 operated SOFC: simulation and experimentation studies. J Power Sources 210:381–39110.1016/j.jpowsour.2011.12.005 ↗
30. Sasaki K, Teraoka Y (2003) Equilibria in fuel cell gases—II. The C–H–O ternary diagrams. J Electrochem Soc 150:A885–A88810.1149/1.1577338 ↗
31. Li M, Hua B, Luo JL (2017) Alternative fuel cell technologies for cogenerating electrical power and syngas from greenhouse gases. ACS Energy Lett 2:1789–179610.1021/acsenergylett.7b00392 ↗
32. Wang W, Wang F, Ran R, Park HJ, Jung DW, Kwak C, Shao ZP (2014) Coking suppression in solid oxide fuel cells operating on ethanol by applying pyridine as fuel additive. J Power Sources 265:20–2910.1016/j.jpowsour.2014.04.111 ↗
33. Kaur G, Basu S (2015) Physical characterization and electrochemical performance of copper–iron–ceria-YSZ anode-based SOFCs in H2 and methane fuels. Int J Energy Res 39:1345–135410.1002/er.3332 ↗
34. Kaur G, Basu S (2014) Study of carbon deposition behavior on Cu–Co/CeO2–YSZ anodes for direct butane solid oxide fuel cells. Fuel Cells 14:1006–101310.1002/fuce.201300287 ↗
35. Cimenti M, Hill JM (2009) Direct utilization of ethanol on ceria-based anodes for solid oxide fuel cells. Asia Pac J Chem Eng 4:45–5410.1002/apj.182 ↗
36. Tao S, Irvine JT, Plint SM (2006) Methane oxidation at redox stable fuel cell electrode La0.75Sr0.25Cr0.5Mn0.5O(3-delta). J Phys Chem B 110:21771–2177610.1021/jp062376q ↗
37. Ruiz-Morales JC, Canales-Vázquez J, Savaniu C, Marrero-López D, Zhou W, Irvine JTS (2006) Disruption of extended defects in solid oxide fuel cell anodes for methane oxidation. Nature 439:568–57110.1038/nature04438 ↗
38. Buccheri MA, Hill JM (2011) Gas products analysis during the electrochemical conversion of dry methane with a La0.3Sr0.7TiO3 and Ni/YSZ bi-layer SOFC anode. ECS Trans 35:1551–156110.1149/1.3570140 ↗
39. Mcintosh S, Vohs JM, Gorte RJ (2002) An examination of lanthanide additives on the performance of Cu–YSZ cermet anodes. Electrochim Acta 47:3815–382110.1016/S0013-4686(02)00352-3 ↗
40. Gorte RJ, Park S, Vohs JM, Wang C (2000) Anodes for direct oxidation of dry hydrocarbons in a solid-oxide fuel cell. Adv Mater 12:1465–146910.1002/1521-4095(200010)12:19<1465::AID-ADMA1465>3.0.CO;2-9 ↗
41. Pillai MR, Kim I, Bierschenk DM, Barnett SA (2008) Fuel-flexible operation of a solid oxide fuel cell with Sr(0.8)La(0.2)TiO(3) support. J Power Sources 185:1086–109310.1016/j.jpowsour.2008.07.063 ↗
42. Marina OA, Canfield NL, Stevenson JW (2002) Thermal, electrical, and electrocatalytical properties of lanthanum-doped strontium titanate. Solid State Ion 149:21–2810.1016/S0167-2738(02)00140-6 ↗
43. Park K, Lee S, Bae G, Bae J (2015) Performance analysis of Cu, Sn and Rh impregnated NiO/CGO91 anode for butane internal reforming SOFC at intermediate temperature. Renew Energy 83:483–49010.1016/j.renene.2015.04.070 ↗
44. Zhu W, Xia C, Fan J, Peng R, Meng G (2006) Ceria coated Ni as anodes for direct utilization of methane in low-temperature solid oxide fuel cells. J Power Sources 160:897–90210.1016/j.jpowsour.2006.02.020 ↗
45. Yang L, Choi Y, Qin W, Chen H, Blinn K, Liu M, Liu P, Bai J, Tyson TA, Liu M (2011) Promotion of water-mediated carbon removal by nanostructured barium oxide/nickel interfaces in solid oxide fuel cells. Nat Commun 2:1–910.1038/ncomms1359 ↗
46. Wang W, Su C, Ran R, Zhao B, Shao Z, Tade MO, Liu S (2014) Nickel-based anode with water storage capability to mitigate carbon deposition for direct ethanol solid oxide fuel cells. ChemSusChem 7:1719–172810.1002/cssc.201301341 ↗
47. Ling Y, Wang Z, Wang Z, Peng R, Lin B, Yu W, Isimjan TT, Lu Y (2015) A robust carbon tolerant anode for solid oxide fuel cells. Sci China Mater 58:204–21210.1007/s40843-015-0033-6 ↗
48. Takeguchi T, Kikuchi R, Yano T, Eguchi K, Murata K (2003) Effect of precious metal addition to Ni–YSZ cermet on reforming of CH4 and electrochemical activity as SOFC anode. Catal Today 84:217–22210.1016/S0920-5861(03)00278-5 ↗
49. Sadykov VA, Mezentseva NV, Bunina RV, Alikina GM, Lukashevich AI, Zaikovskii VI, Bobrenok OF, Irvine J, Vasylyev OD, Smirnova AL (2010) Design of anode materials for IT SOFC: effect of complex oxide promoters and Pt group metals on activity and stability in methane steam reforming of Ni/YSZ (ScSZ) cermets. J Fuel Cell Sci Tech 7:1–610.1115/1.3117255 ↗
50. Li D, Nakagawa Y, Tomishige K (2011) Methane reforming to synthesis gas over Ni catalysts modified with noble metals. Appl Catal A Gen 408:1–2410.1016/j.apcata.2011.09.018 ↗
51. Lee HJ, Lim YS, Park NC, Kim YC (2009) Catalytic autothermal reforming of propane over the noble metal-doped hydrotalcite-type catalysts. Chem Eng J 146:295–30110.1016/j.cej.2008.10.007 ↗
52. Wu JCS, Chou HC (2009) Bimetallic Rh–Ni/BN catalyst for methane reforming with CO2. Chem Eng J 148:539–54510.1016/j.cej.2009.01.011 ↗
53. Miyata T, Li D, Shiraga M, Shishido T, Oumi Y, Sano T, Takehira K (2006) Promoting effect of Rh, Pd and Pt noble metals to the Ni/Mg(Al)O catalysts for the DSS-like operation in CH4 steam reforming. Appl Catal A Gen 310:97–10410.1016/j.apcata.2006.05.022 ↗
54. Bae G, Bae J, Kim-Lohsoontorn P, Jeong J (2010) Performance of SOFC coupled with n-C4H10 autothermal reformer: carbon deposition and development of anode structure. Int J Hydrog Energy 35:12346–1235810.1016/j.ijhydene.2010.08.125 ↗
55. Arandiyan H, Peng Y, Liu CX, Chang HZ, Li JH (2014) Effects of noble metals doped on mesoporous LaAlNi mixed oxide catalyst and identification of carbon deposit for reforming CH4 with CO2. J Chem Technol Biotechnol 89:372–38110.1002/jctb.4127 ↗
56. Mawdsley JR, Krause TR (2008) Rare earth-first-row transition metal perovskites as catalysts for the autothermal reforming of hydrocarbon fuels to generate hydrogen. Appl Catal A Gen 334:311–32010.1016/j.apcata.2007.10.018 ↗
57. Rezaei M, Alavi SM, Sahebdelfar S, Yan ZF (2006) Syngas production by methane reforming with carbon dioxide on noble metal catalysts. J Energy Chem 15:327–334
58. Zhu H, Wang W, Ran R, Shao Z (2013) A new nickel-ceria composite for direct-methane solid oxide fuel cells. Int J Hydrog Energy 38:3741–374910.1016/j.ijhydene.2013.01.032 ↗
59. Wang S, Lu GQ (1998) Catalytic activities and coking characteristics of oxides-supported Ni catalysts for CH4 reforming with carbon dioxide. Energy Fuel 12:248–25610.1021/ef970092m ↗
60. Chen XJ, Khor KA, Chan SH (2005) Suppression of carbon deposition at CeO2-modified Ni/YSZ anodes in weakly humidified CH4 at 850° C. Electrochem Solid State Lett 8:A79–A8210.1149/1.1843791 ↗
61. Qiao J, Zhang N, Wang Z, Mao Y, Sun K, Yuan Y (2009) Performance of mix-impregnated CeO2–Ni/YSZ anodes for direct oxidation of methane in solid oxide fuel cells. Fuel Cells 9:729–73910.1002/fuce.200800104 ↗
62. Shanmugam V, Zapf R, Neuberg S, Hessel V, Kolb G (2017) Effect of ceria and zirconia promotors on Ni/SBA-15 catalysts for coking and sintering resistant steam reforming of propylene glycol in microreactors. Appl Catal B Environ 203:859–86910.1016/j.apcatb.2016.10.075 ↗
63. Sun YF, Zhou XW, Zeng YM, Amirkhiz BS, Wang MN, Zhang LZ, Hua B, Li J, Li JH, Luo JL (2015) An ingenious Ni/Ce co-doped titanate based perovskite as a coking-tolerant anode material for direct hydrocarbon solid oxide fuel cells. J Mater Chem A 3:22830–2283810.1039/C5TA06200D ↗
64. Sun YF, Li JH, Chuang KT, Luo JL (2015) Electrochemical performance and carbon deposition resistance of Ce-doped La0.7Sr0.3Fe0.5Cr0.5O3−δ anode materials for solid oxide fuel cells fed with syngas. J Power Sources 274:483–48710.1016/j.jpowsour.2014.10.090 ↗
65. Liu J, Barnett SA (2003) Operation of anode-supported solid oxide fuel cells on methane and natural gas. Solid State Ion 158:11–1610.1016/S0167-2738(02)00769-5 ↗
66. Duarte RB, Nachtegaal M, Bueno JMC, Bokhoven JAV (2012) Understanding the effect of Sm2O3 and CeO2 promoters on the structure and activity of Rh/Al2O3 catalysts in methane steam reforming. J Catal 296:86–9810.1016/j.jcat.2012.09.007 ↗
67. Habimana F (2009) Effect of Cu promoter on Ni-based SBA-15 catalysts for partial oxidation of methane to syngas. J Energy Chem 18:392–398
68. Vizcaíno AJ, Carrero A, Calles JA (2007) Hydrogen production by ethanol steam reforming over Cu–Ni supported catalysts. Int J Hydrog Energy 32:1450–146110.1016/j.ijhydene.2006.10.024 ↗
69. Zhang H, Li M, Xiao P, Liu D, Zou CJ (2013) Structure and catalytic performance of Mg-SBA-15-supported nickel catalysts for CO2 reforming of methane to syngas. Chem Eng Technol 36:1701–170710.1002/ceat.201300006 ↗
70. Calles JA, Carrero A, Vizcaíno AJ, García-Moreno L (2014) Hydrogen production by glycerol steam reforming over SBA-15-supported nickel catalysts: effect of alkaline earth promoters on activity and stability. Catal Today 227:198–20610.1016/j.cattod.2013.11.006 ↗
71. Tao J, Zhao LQ, Dong CQ, Qiang L, Du XZ, Dahlquist E (2013) Catalytic steam reforming of toluene as a model compound of biomass gasification tar using Ni–CeO2/SBA-15 catalysts. Energies 6:3284–329610.3390/en6073284 ↗
72. Albarazi A, Gálvez ME, Costa PD (2015) Synthesis strategies of ceria–zirconia doped Ni/SBA-15 catalysts for methane dry reforming. Catal Commun 59:108–11210.1016/j.catcom.2014.09.050 ↗
73. Wang K, Li X, Ji S, Shi X, Tang JJ (2016) Effect of Ce x Zr1−xO2 promoter on Ni-based SBA-15 catalyst for steam reforming of methane. Energy Fuel 23:25–3110.1021/ef800553b ↗
74. Wang N, Wei C, Zhang T, Zhao XS (2012) Synthesis, characterization and catalytic performances of Ce-SBA-15 supported nickel catalysts for methane dry reforming to hydrogen and syngas. Int J Hydrog Energy 37:19–3010.1016/j.ijhydene.2011.03.138 ↗
75. Li D, Zeng L, Li X, Wang X, Ma H, Assabumrungrat S, Gong J (2015) Ceria-promoted Ni/SBA-15 catalysts for ethanol steam reforming with enhanced activity and resistance to deactivation. Appl Catal B Environ s176–177:532–54110.1016/j.apcatb.2015.04.020 ↗
76. Xie T, Zhao X, Zhang J, Shi L, Zhang D (2015) Ni nanoparticles immobilized Ce-modified mesoporous silica via a novel sublimation-deposition strategy for catalytic reforming of methane with carbon dioxide. Int J Hydrog Energy 40:9685–969510.1016/j.ijhydene.2015.06.008 ↗
77. Calles JA, Carrero A, Vizcaíno AJ (2009) Ce and La modification of mesoporous Cu–Ni/SBA-15 catalysts for hydrogen production through ethanol steam reforming. Microporous Mesoporous Mater 119:200–20710.1016/j.micromeso.2008.10.028 ↗
78. He B (2012) Fabrication and characterization of novel anode materials for intermediate temperature solid oxide fuel cells. Ph.D. Dissertation, University of Science and Technology of China, China
79. Li M, Hua B, Luo JL, Jiang SP, Pu J, Chi B, Li J (2016) Enhancing sulfur tolerance of Ni-based cermet anodes of solid oxide fuel cells by ytterbium-doped barium cerate infiltration. ACS Appl Mater Int 8:10293–1030110.1021/acsami.6b00925 ↗
80. Li X, Liu M, Lai SY, Ding D, Gong M, Lee JP, Blinn KS, Bu Y, Wang Z, Bottomley LA (2015) In situ probing of the mechanisms of coking resistance on catalyst-modified anodes for solid oxide fuel cells. Chem Mater 27:822–82810.1021/cm503852v ↗
81. Liu M, Choi YM, Yang L, Blinn K, Qin W, Liu P, Liu M (2012) Direct octane fuel cells: a promising power for transportation. Nano Energy 1:448–45510.1016/j.nanoen.2012.02.006 ↗
82. Shishkin M, Ziegler T (2013) Coke-tolerant Ni/BaCe1−xY x O3−δ anodes for solid oxide fuel cells: DFT + U Study. J Phys Chem C 117:7086–709610.1021/jp312485q ↗
83. Wang X, Zhang T, Kang J, Zhao L, Guo L, Feng P, Zhou F, Ling Y (2017) Numerical modeling of ceria-based SOFCs with bi-layer electrolyte free from internal short circuit: comparison of two cell configurations. Electrochim Acta 248:356–36710.1016/j.electacta.2017.07.130 ↗
84. Ling Y, Chen J, Wang Z, Xia C, Peng R, Lu Y (2013) New ionic diffusion strategy to fabricate proton conducting solid oxide fuel cells based on a stable La2Ce2O7 electrolyte. Int J of Hydrog Energy 38:7430–743710.1016/j.ijhydene.2013.04.051 ↗
85. Wang X, Wei K, Kang J, Shen S, Budiman RA, Ou X, Zhou F, Ling Y (2018) Experimental and numerical studies of a bifunctional proton conducting anode of ceria-based SOFCs free from internal shorting and carbon deposition. Electrochim Acta 264:109–11810.1016/j.electacta.2018.01.117 ↗
86. Ma J, Jiang C, Connor PA, Cassidy M, Irvine JTS (2015) Highly efficient, coking-resistant SOFCs for energy conversion using biogas fuels. J Mater Chem A 3:19068–1907610.1039/C5TA06421J ↗
87. Konwar D, Nguyen NTQ, Yoon HH (2015) Evaluation of BaZr0.1Ce0.7Y0.2O3−delta electrolyte prepared by carbonate precipitation for a mixed ion-conducting SOFC. Int J Hydrog Energy 40:11651–1165810.1016/j.ijhydene.2015.05.056 ↗
88. Gong Z, Sun WP, Shan D, Wu YS, Liu W (2016) Tuning the thickness of Ba-containing “Functional” layer toward high-performance ceria-based solid oxide fuel cells. ACS Appl Mater Int 8:10835–1084010.1021/acsami.6b01000 ↗
89. Wang W, Chen Y, Wang F, Tade MO, Shao Z (2015) Enhanced electrochemical performance, water storage capability and coking resistance of a Ni + BaZr0.1Ce0.7Y0.1Yb0.1O3−δ anode for solid oxide fuel cells operating on ethanol. Chem Eng Sci 126:22–3110.1016/j.ces.2014.12.011 ↗
90. Bradford MCJ, Vannice MA (1996) Catalytic reforming of methane with carbon dioxide over nickel catalysts II. Reaction kinetics. Appl Catal A Gen 142:97–12210.1016/0926-860X(96)00066-X ↗
91. Wu T, Yan Q, Wan H (2005) Partial oxidation of methane to hydrogen and carbon monoxide over a Ni/TiO 2 catalyst. J Mol Catal A Chem 226:41–4810.1016/j.molcata.2004.09.016 ↗
92. Wang ZQ, Wang ZB, Yang WQ, Peng RR, Lu YL (2014) Carbon-tolerant solid oxide fuel cells using NiTiO3 as an anode internal reforming layer. J Power Sources 255:404–40910.1016/j.jpowsour.2014.01.014 ↗
93. Tietz F, Dias FJ, Dubiel B, Penkalla HJ (1999) Manufacturing of NiO/NiTiO3 porous substrates and the role of zirconia impurities during sintering. Mater Sci Eng B 68:35–4110.1016/S0921-5107(99)00333-5 ↗
94. Meschke F, Dias FJ, Tietz F (2001) Porous Ni/TiO2 substrates for planar solid oxide fuel cell applications. J Mater Sci 36:5719–5728. https://doi.org/10.1023/A:101259440605310.1023/A:1012594406053 ↗
95. Rodriguez JA, Ma S, Liu P, Hrbek J, Evans J, Perez M (2007) Activity of CeO x and TiO x nanoparticles grown on Au(111) in the water-gas shift reaction. Science 318:1757–176010.1126/science.1150038 ↗
96. Cai W, Fu X, Guo T, Chen H, Zhao L, Ou X, Feng P, Ling Y (2017) An active anode functional layer for intermediate temperature solid oxide fuel cells with carbon-tolerant anode. Mater Lett 208:54–5710.1016/j.matlet.2017.05.056 ↗
97. Schaub R, Thostrup P, Lopez N, Laegsgaard E, Stensgaard I, Norskov JK, Besenbacher F (2001) Oxygen vacancies as active sites for water dissociation on rutile TiO(2)(110). Phys Rev Lett 87(266104):1–4
98. Lindan PJD, Zhang CJ (2005) Comment on “molecular chemisorption as the theoretically preferred pathway for water adsorption on ideal rutile TiO2 (110)”. Phys Rev Lett 95:02960110.1103/PhysRevLett.95.029601 ↗
99. Harris LA, Quong AA (2004) Molecular chemisorption as the theoretically preferred pathway for water adsorption on ideal rutile TiO2(110). Phys Rev Lett 93(086105):1–4
100. Duncan DA, Allegretti F, Woodruff DP (2012) Water does partially dissociate on the perfect TiO2(110) surface: a quantitative structure determination. Phys Rev B 86:3573–357610.1103/PhysRevB.86.045411 ↗