Nano-dynamic mechanical analysis (nano-DMA) of creep behavior of shales: Bakken case study
Source abstract
Abstract
Understanding the time-dependent mechanical behavior of rocks is important from various aspects and different scales such as predicting reservoir subsidence due to depletion or proppant embedment. Instead of using the conventional creep tests, nano-dynamic mechanical analysis (nano-DMA) was applied in this study to quantify the displacement and mechanical changes in shale samples over its creep time at a very fine scale. The results showed that the minerals with various mechanical properties exhibit different creep behavior. It was found that under the same constant load and time conditions, the creep displacement of hard minerals would be smaller than those that are softer. On the contrary, the changes in mechanical properties (storage modulus, loss modulus, complex modulus and hardness) of hard minerals are larger than soft minerals. The results from curve fitting showed that the changes in creep displacement, storage modulus, complex modulus and hardness over creep time follow a logarithmic function. We further analyzed the mechanical changes in every single phase during the creep time based on the deconvolution method to realize each phase’s response independently. Two distinct mechanical phases can be derived from the deconvolution histograms. As the creep time increases, the volume percentage of the hard mechanical phase decreases, while this shows an increase for soft phases. The results suggest that nano-DMA can be a strong advocate to study the creep behavior of rocks with complex mineralogy.
Source: openaire · Quality: candidate unverified · Source record ↗
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Rock Mechanics and Modeling · Tunneling and Rock Mechanics · High-pressure geophysics and materials
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
References (39)
Show source-provided references
1. Alramahi B, Sundberg MI (2012) Proppant embedment and conductivity of hydraulic fractures in shales. Presented at the 46th US rock mechanics/geomechanics symposium. American Rock Mechanics Association
2. Almasoodi MM, Abousleiman YN, Hoang SK (2014) Viscoelastic creep of eagle ford shale: investigating fluid-shale interaction. Presented at the SPE/CSUR unconventional resources conference–Canada. Society of Petroleum Engineers10.2118/171569-MS ↗
3. Bybee K (2007) Rock-mechanics considerations in fracturing a carbonate formation. JPT 59(07):50–5310.2118/0707-0050-JPT ↗
4. Li Y, Ghassemi A (2012) Creep behavior of Barnett, Haynesville, and Marcellus shale. Presented at the 46th US rock mechanics/geomechanics symposium. American Rock Mechanics Association
5. Sone H, Zoback MD (2011) Visco-plastic properties of shale gas reservoir rocks. Presented at the 45th US rock mechanics/geomechanics symposium. American Rock Mechanics Association
6. Heap MJ, Baud P, Meredith PG et al (2009) Time-dependent brittle creep in Darley Dale sandstone. J Geophys Res Sol Ea 114(B07203):1–22
7. Sone H, Zoback MD (2014) Time-dependent deformation of shale gas reservoir rocks and its long-term effect on the in situ state of stress. Int J Rock Mech Min 69:120–13210.1016/j.ijrmms.2014.04.002 ↗
8. Ulm F-J, Vandamme M, Bobko C et al (2007) Statistical indentation techniques for hydrated nanocomposites: concrete, bone, and shale. J Am Ceram Soc 90(9):2677–269210.1111/j.1551-2916.2007.02012.x ↗
9. Naderi S, Dabbagh A, Hassan MA et al (2016) Modeling of porosity in hydroxyapatite for finite element simulation of nanoindentation test. Ceram Int 42(6):7543–755010.1016/j.ceramint.2016.01.161 ↗
10. Tanguy M, Bourmaud A, Baley C (2016) Plant cell walls to reinforce composite materials: relationship between nanoindentation and tensile modulus. Mater Lett 167:161–16410.1016/j.matlet.2015.12.167 ↗
11. Xiao G, Yang X, Yuan G, Li Z, Shu X (2015) Mechanical properties of intermetallic compounds at the Sn–3.0Ag–0.5Cu/Cu joint interface using nanoindentation. Mater Des 88:520–52710.1016/j.matdes.2015.09.059 ↗
12. Kobelev NP, Nikolaev RK, Soifer YM et al (1998) Elastic moduli of single-crystal C 60. Phys Solid State 40(1):154–15610.1134/1.1130260 ↗
13. Alstadt KN, Katti KS, Katti DR (2015) Nanoscale morphology of kerogen and in situ nanomechanical properties of green river oil shale. J. Nanomech. Micromech 6:1–10
14. Yang Z, Wang L, Zhang G (2016) Micromechanical characterization of fluid-shale interactions via nanoindentation. SPE Asia Pacific Hydraulic Fracturing Conference, Society of Petroleum Engineers10.2118/181833-MS ↗
15. Zhang YH, Zhang ZK, Sarmadivaleh M (2017) Micro-scale fracturing mechanisms in coal induced by adsorption of supercritical CO2. Int J Coal Geol 175:40–5010.1016/j.coal.2017.04.002 ↗
16. Kumar V, Curtis ME, Gupta N, et al (2012) Estimation of elastic properties of organic matter in Woodford Shale through nanoindentation measurements. In: SPE Canadian unconventional resources conference. Society of Petroleum Engineers10.2118/162778-MS ↗
17. Yang Z, Wang L, Zhang G, et al (2016) Micromechanical characterization of fluid-shale interactions via nanoindentation. In: SPE Asia Pacific hydraulic fracturing conference. Society of Petroleum Engineers10.2118/181833-MS ↗
18. Oliver WC, Pharr GM (1992) An improved technique for determining hardness and elastic modulus using load and displacement sensing indentation experiments. J Mater Res 7(6):1564–158310.1557/JMR.1992.1564 ↗
19. Vandamme M, Ulm F-J (2009) Nanogranular origin of concrete creep. PNAS 106(26):10552–1055710.1073/pnas.0901033106 ↗
20. Vandamme M, Ulm F-J (2013) Nanoindentation investigation of creep properties of calcium silicate hydrates. Cement Concrete Res 52:38–5210.1016/j.cemconres.2013.05.006 ↗
21. Menard, K.P., 2008. Dynamic mechanical analysis: a practical introduction. CRC press10.1201/9781420053135 ↗
22. Elomari S, Boukhili R, Skibo MD et al (1995) Dynamic mechanical analysis of prestrained Al2O3/Al metal-matrix composite. J Mater Sci 30(12):3037–3044. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF0120921410.1007/BF01209214 ↗
23. Kararli TT, Hurlbut JB, Needham TE (1990) Glass–rubber transitions of cellulosic polymers by dynamic mechanical analysis. J Pharm Sci 79(9):845–84810.1002/jps.2600790922 ↗
24. Yamashita J, Furman BR, Rawls HR et al (2001) The use of dynamic mechanical analysis to assess the viscoelastic properties of human cortical bone. J Biomed Mater Res A 58(1):47–5310.1002/1097-4636(2001)58:1<47::AID-JBM70>3.0.CO;2-U ↗
25. Yan H, Sun W, Chen H (1999) The effect of silica fume and steel fiber on the dynamic mechanical performance of high-strength concrete. Cement Concrete Res 29(3):423–42610.1016/S0008-8846(98)00235-X ↗
26. Herbert EG, Oliver WC, Pharr GM (2008) Nanoindentation and the dynamic characterization of viscoelastic solids. J Phys D Appl Phys 41(7):07402110.1088/0022-3727/41/7/074021 ↗
27. Bruker Company. Quantitative nanoscale depth-profiling and viscoelastic property measurements. https://www.bruker.com/nc/products/surface-and-dimensional-analysis/nanomechanical-test-instruments/nanomechanical-upgrade-options/nanodma-iii.html
28. Bobko CP (2008) Assessing the mechanical microstructure of shale by nanoindentation: The link between mineral composition and mechanical properties. Ph.D. thesis. Massachusetts Institute of Technology
29. Constantinides G, Ravi Chandran KS, Ulm F-J, Van Vliet KJ (2006) Grid indentation analysis of composite microstructure and mechanics: principles and validation. Mater Sci Eng A 430(1–2):189–20210.1016/j.msea.2006.05.125 ↗
30. Hu C, Li Z (2015) A review on the mechanical properties of cement-based materials measured by nanoindentation. Constr Build Mater 90:80–9010.1016/j.conbuildmat.2015.05.008 ↗
31. Vieregge J, Schier J. Continuous nanoscale dynamic mechanical analysis of PMMA. https://www.hysitron.com/media/1520/pol11an-r1f.pdf
32. Yamashita J, Furman BR, Rawls HR, Wang X, Agrawal CM (2001) The use of dynamic mechanical analysis to assess the viscoelastic properties of human cortical bone. J Biomed Mater Res 58:47–5310.1002/1097-4636(2001)58:1<47::AID-JBM70>3.0.CO;2-U ↗
33. Les CM, Spence CA, Vance JL et al (2004) Determinants of ovine compact bone viscoelastic properties: effects of architecture, mineralization, and remodeling. Bone 35(3):729–73810.1016/j.bone.2004.04.006 ↗
34. Liu K, Ostadhassan M (2017) Quantification of the microstructures of Bakken shale reservoirs using multi-fractal and lacunarity analysis. J Nat Gas Sci Eng 39:62–7110.1016/j.jngse.2017.01.035 ↗
35. Liu K, Ostadhassan M, Bubach B (2016) Applications of nano-indentation methods to estimate nanoscale mechanical properties of shale reservoir rocks. J Nat Gas Sci Eng 35:1310–131910.1016/j.jngse.2016.09.068 ↗
36. Wu Z, Baker TA, Ovaert TC et al (2011) The effect of holding time on nanoindentation measurements of creep in bone. J Biomech 44(6):1066–107210.1016/j.jbiomech.2011.01.039 ↗
37. Liu K, Ostadhassan M, Zhou J et al (2017) Nanoscale pore structure characterization of the Bakken shale in the USA. Fuel 209:567–57810.1016/j.fuel.2017.08.034 ↗
38. Delesse M (1847) Procede mecanique pour determiner la composition des roches. C R Acad Sci 25:544–547
39. Karato SI (2013) Rheological properties of minerals and rocks. In: Karato SI (ed) Physics and Chemistry of the Deep Earth, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd, Chichester, UK, pp. 94–14410.1002/9781118529492.ch4 ↗