Influence of rolling temperature on static recrystallization behavior of AZ31 magnesium alloy
Source abstract
Abstract
Poor formability of rolled magnesium (Mg) alloys extremely restricts applications in form of sheets originating from formation of strong basal texture. Recently, we found that increasing rolling temperature from 723 to 798 K for a AZ31 Mg alloy can significantly improve stretch formability due to remarkable texture weakening after annealing. In this study, static recrystallization behaviors of AZ31 alloy sheets rolled at 723 and 798 K were investigated by electron backscattered diffraction analyses at different annealing stages in order to understand the origin of high temperature rolling on texture weakening. For both sheets, similar deformation microstructures with approximately the same types and fractions of twins exist in the as-rolled condition and recrystallized grains are mainly formed at pre-existing grain boundaries due to discontinuous recrystallization during subsequent annealing. However, only the basal texture of the latter remarkably weakens due to the formation of new recrystallized grains with well-dispersed orientations. Non-basal slips enhanced during high temperature rolling at 798 K are most likely responsible for the texture randomization as a result of rotations of recrystallization nuclei.
Source: openaire · Quality: candidate unverified · Source record ↗
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Magnesium Alloys: Properties and Applications · Aluminum Alloys Composites Properties · Aluminum Alloy Microstructure Properties
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
References (22)
Show source-provided references
1. Luo AA (2002) JOM 54:4210.1007/BF02701073 ↗
2. Nyberg EA, Luo AA, Sadayappan K, Shi WF (2008) Adv Mater Process 166:35
3. Yang XY, Miura H, Sakai T (2005) Mater Trans 46:298110.2320/matertrans.46.2981 ↗
4. Mackenzie LWF, Pekguleryuz M (2008) Mater Sci Eng A 480:18910.1016/j.msea.2007.07.003 ↗
5. Huang XS, Suzuki K, Watazu A, Shigematsu I, Saito N (2008) J Mater Res 23:302910.1557/JMR.2008.0368 ↗
6. Abdessameud S, Bradai D (2009) Can Metall Quart 48:43310.1179/cmq.2009.48.4.433 ↗
7. Martin É, Jiang L, Godet S, Jonas JJ (2009) Int J Mat Res 100:57610.3139/146.110060 ↗
8. Yi SB, Schestakow I, Zaefferer S (2009) Mater Sci Eng A 516:5810.1016/j.msea.2009.03.015 ↗
9. Li X, Yang P, Wang LN, Meng L, Cui F (2009) Mater Sci Eng A 517:16010.1016/j.msea.2009.03.045 ↗
10. Chen HM, Yu HS, Kang SB, Cho JH, Min GH (2010) Mater Sci Eng A 527:123610.1016/j.msea.2009.09.057 ↗
11. Hantzsche K, Bohlen J, Wendt J, Kainer KU, Yi SB, Letzig D (2010) Scripta Mater 63:72510.1016/j.scriptamat.2009.12.033 ↗
12. Huang XS, Suzuki K, Chino Y (2011) J Alloy Compd 509:485410.1016/j.jallcom.2011.01.189 ↗
13. Yang XY, Okabe Y, Miura H, Sakai T (2011) J Mater Sci 47:2823. doi: 10.1007/s10853-011-6111-610.1007/s10853-011-6111-6 ↗
14. Huang XS, Suzuki K, Chino Y, Mabuchi M (2011) J Alloy Compd 509:757910.1016/j.jallcom.2011.04.132 ↗
15. Huang XS, Suzuki K, Saito N (2009) Scripta Mater 61:44510.1016/j.scriptamat.2009.04.042 ↗
16. Huang XS, Suzuki K, Chino Y (2010) Scripta Mater 63:39510.1016/j.scriptamat.2010.04.032 ↗
17. Huang XS, Suzuki K, Saito N (2009) Mater Sci Eng A 508:22610.1016/j.msea.2008.12.052 ↗
18. Chapuis A, Driver JH (2011) Acta Mater 59:198610.1016/j.actamat.2010.11.064 ↗
19. Kashihara K, Tagami M, Okada T, Inoko F (2000) Mater Sci Eng A 291:20710.1016/S0921-5093(00)00961-8 ↗
20. Okada T, Tagami M, Kashihara K, Inoko F (1998) ISIJ Int 38:51810.2355/isijinternational.38.518 ↗
21. Sabin TJ, Winther G, Juul Jensen D (2003) Acta Mater 51:399910.1016/S1359-6454(03)00220-9 ↗
22. Wu GL, Juul Jensen D (2007) Acta Mater 55:495510.1016/j.actamat.2007.05.019 ↗