Electric field distribution and jet motion in electrospinning process: from needle to hole
Source abstract
Abstract
The electric field distribution, the jet motion, and the resultant fiber morphology are systematically studied for a single needle and a “hole” electrospinning system. The 3D electric fields and the jet bending processes of the two configurations are simulated. High-speed photography is adopted to capture the jet motion during electrospinning. Four parameters including the straight jet length, the amplitude and frequency of the whipping process, and the velocity of the bending jet are measured to characterize the development of the jet motion. The results show that the hole electrospinning setup produces shorter straight jet length, smaller envelope cone, but higher whipping frequency, and lower jet dropping velocity. These factors result in fine and uniform fibers produced from the “hole” electrospinning system.
Source: openaire · Quality: candidate unverified · Source record ↗
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Electrospun Nanofibers in Biomedical Applications · Advanced Sensor and Energy Harvesting Materials · Electrohydrodynamics and Fluid Dynamics
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
References (19)
Show source-provided references
1. Zhang Y, Chwee TL, Ramakrishna S, Huang ZM (2005) J Mater Sci Mater Med 16:93310.1007/s10856-005-4428-x ↗
2. Burger C, Hsiao BS, Chu B (2006) Annu Rev Mater Res 36:33310.1146/annurev.matsci.36.011205.123537 ↗
3. Rebouillat S, Lyons M (2011) Int J Electrochem Sci 6:573110.1016/S1452-3981(23)18440-9 ↗
4. Varabhas JS, Chase GG, Reneker DH (2008) Polymer 49:422610.1016/j.polymer.2008.07.043 ↗
5. Dosunmu OO, Chase GG, Kataphinan W, Reneker DH (2006) Nanotechnology 17:112310.1088/0957-4484/17/4/046 ↗
6. Zhou FL, Gong RH, Isaac P (2009) J Mater Sci 44:5501. doi: 10.1007/s10853-009-3768-110.1007/s10853-009-3768-1 ↗
7. Thoppey NM, Bochinski JR, Clarke LI, Gorga RE (2010) Polymer 51:492810.1016/j.polymer.2010.07.046 ↗
8. Theron S, Yarin AL, Zussman E, Kroll E (2005) Polymer 46:288910.1016/j.polymer.2005.01.054 ↗
9. Alessio V, Fabio R, Giorgio M, Claudio T, Renato C (2010) Polym Int 59:160610.1002/pi.2893 ↗
10. Srivastava Y, Loscertales I, Marquez M, Thorsen T (2008) Microfluid Nanofluid 4:24510.1007/s10404-007-0177-0 ↗
11. Niu HT, Lin T, Wang XG (2009) J Appl Polym Sci 114:352410.1002/app.30891 ↗
12. He JH, Liu Y (2008) Chaos Soliton Fract 37:64310.1016/j.chaos.2007.11.028 ↗
13. Yarin AL, Zussman E (2004) Polymer 45:297710.1016/j.polymer.2004.02.066 ↗
14. Wang X, Niu HT, Lin T (2009) Polym Eng Sci 49:158210.1002/pen.21377 ↗
15. Thoppey NM, Bochinski JR, Clarke LI, Gorga RE (2011) Nanotechnology 22:34530110.1088/0957-4484/22/34/345301 ↗
16. Forward KM, Rutledge GC (2012) Chem Eng J 183:49210.1016/j.cej.2011.12.045 ↗
17. Xie S, Zeng YC (2012) Ind Eng Chem Res 51:533610.1021/ie2020763 ↗
18. Sun YF, Zeng YC, Wang XH (2011) Ind Eng Chem Res 50:109910.1021/ie101744q ↗
19. Reneker DH, Yarin AL, Fong H, Koombhongse S (2000) J Appl Phys 87:453110.1063/1.373532 ↗