Structure–property relationship of shape memory polyurethane cross-linked by a polyethyleneglycol spacer between polyurethane chains
Source abstract
Abstract
Shape memory polyurethane (SMPU) cross-linked by a polyethyleneglycol (PEG) spacer at its side was compared with a linear SMPU and the one randomly cross-linked by glycerol. The SMPU was composed of 4,4′-methylenebis(phenylisocyanate) (MDI), polytetramethyleneglycol-2000 (PTMG-2000), 1,4-butanediol (BD), glycerol, and PEG-200 as a spacer. PEG-200 connected the glycerol hydroxyl groups of two polyurethane chains via the connecting agent, MDI. Tm of the soft segment increased with the increase of cross-linking content. Cross-link density measured by the swelling experiment increased in proportion to the glycerol content. A surprising increase in maximum stress compared to the linear SMPU was attained without any sacrifice in strain. Remarkably, the stress–strain curve revealed that the PEG cross-linked SMPU exhibited a similar behavior and superior tensile mechanical properties to natural rubber. Storage modulus also increased and loss tangent became broad in distribution over the temperature range after PEG cross-linking. Shape recovery rate went up to 96.8%, and shape recovery speed was three times faster than that of linear SMPU.
Source: openaire · Quality: candidate unverified · Source record ↗
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Polymer composites and self-healing · Marine Sponges and Natural Products · Marine Biology and Environmental Chemistry
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
References (18)
Show source-provided references
1. Yang JH, Chun BC, Chung YC, Cho JH (2003) Polymer 44:325110.1016/S0032-3861(03)00260-X ↗
2. Li F, Chen Y, Zhu W, Zhang X, Xu M (1998) Polymer 39:692910.1016/S0032-3861(98)00099-8 ↗
3. Liang C, Rogers CA, Malafeew E (1997) J Intell Mater Syst Struct 8:38010.1177/1045389X9700800411 ↗
4. Chun BC, Cha SH, Chung YC, Cho JW (2002) J Appl Polym Sci 83:2710.1002/app.2228 ↗
5. Kim BK, Lee SY, Xu M (1996) Polymer 37:578110.1016/S0032-3861(96)00442-9 ↗
6. Tobushi H, Hara H, Yamada E, Hayashi S (1996) Smart Mater Struct 5:48310.1088/0964-1726/5/4/012 ↗
7. Takahashi T, Hayashi N, Hayashi S (1996) J Appl Polym Sci 60:106110.1002/(SICI)1097-4628(19960516)60:7<1061::AID-APP18>3.0.CO;2-3 ↗
8. Lee BS, Chun BC, Chung YC, Sul KI, Cho JW (2001) Macromolecules 34:643110.1021/ma001842l ↗
9. Ota S (1981) Radia Phys Chem 18:81
10. Chen LW, Lin JR (1998) J Appl Polym Sci 69:156310.1002/(SICI)1097-4628(19980822)69:8<1563::AID-APP11>3.0.CO;2-W ↗
11. Chen LW, Lin JR (1998) J Appl Polym Sci 69:157510.1002/(SICI)1097-4628(19980822)69:8<1575::AID-APP12>3.0.CO;2-U ↗
12. Hu J, Yang Z, Yeung L, Ji F, Liu Y (2005) Polym Int 54:85410.1002/pi.1785 ↗
13. Yang Z, Hu J, Liu Y, Yeung L (2006) Mater Chem Phys 98:36810.1016/j.matchemphys.2005.09.065 ↗
14. Carey MA, Wellons SL, Elder DK (1984) J Cellular Plastic 20:4210.1177/0021955X8402000104 ↗
15. Petrovic ZS, Javni I, Divjakovic V (1998) J Polym Sci B: Polym Phys 36:22110.1002/(SICI)1099-0488(19980130)36:2<221::AID-POLB3>3.0.CO;2-U ↗
16. Hur MK, Kwak JM, Hur T (1996) Polymer (Korea) 20:392
17. Coleman MM, Lee KH, Skrovanek DJ, Painter PC (1986) Macromolecules 19:214910.1021/ma00162a008 ↗
18. Seymour RW, Estes GM, Cooper SL (1970) Macromolecules 3:57910.1021/ma60017a021 ↗