A 2D percolation-based model for characterizing the piezoresistivity of carbon nanotube-based films
Source abstract
Abstract
Carbon nanotubes (CNTs) have attracted considerable attention due to their unique electrical, mechanical, and electromechanical properties. In particular, thin films formed by embedding CNTs in polymer matrices have been shown to exhibit strain-sensitive electromechanical properties, which can serve as an alternative to traditional strain sensors. Although numerous experimental studies have characterized their electrical properties and piezoresistivity, it remains unclear as to what nano-scale mechanisms dominate to govern nanocomposite electromechanical properties. Therefore, the objective of this study is to create a two-dimensional (2D) percolation-based numerical model to understand the electrical and coupled electromechanical behavior of CNT-based thin films. First, a percolation-based model with randomly dispersed straight nanotubes was generated. Second, the percolation and unstrained electrical properties of the model were evaluated as a function of CNT density and length. Next, uniaxial tensile–compressive strains were applied to the model for characterizing their electromechanical response and piezoresistivity. In addition, the effects of different intrinsic strain sensitivities of individual nanotubes were also considered. The results showed that bulk film strain sensitivity was strongly related to CNT density, length, and its intrinsic strain sensitivity. In particular, it was found that strain sensitivity decreased with increasing CNT density. While these strain sensitivity trends were consistent for different intrinsic CNT gage factors, the results were more complicated near the percolation threshold. These results were also compared to other experimental research so as to understand how different nano-scale parameters propagate and affect bulk film response.
Source: openaire · Quality: candidate unverified · Source record ↗
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Carbon Nanotubes in Composites · Nonlocal and gradient elasticity in micro/nano structures · Mechanical and Optical Resonators
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
References (54)
Show source-provided references
1. Coleman JN, Khan U, Gun’ko YK (2006) Mechanical reinforcement of polymers using carbon nanotubes. Adv Mater 18:689–70610.1002/adma.200501851 ↗
2. Tsukagoshi K, Yoneya N, Uryu S, Aoyagi Y, Kanda A, Ootuka Y, Alphenaar BW (2002) Carbon nanotube devices for nanoelectronics. Physica B 323:107–11410.1016/S0921-4526(02)00993-6 ↗
3. Baughman RH, Zakhidov AA, de Heer WA (2002) Carbon nanotubes-the route toward applications. Science 297:787–79210.1126/science.1060928 ↗
4. De Volder MFL, Tawfick SH, Baughman RH, Hart AJ (2013) Carbon nanotubes: present and future commercial applications. Science 339:535–53910.1126/science.1222453 ↗
5. Javey A, Guo J, Wang Q, Lundstrom M, Dai H (2003) Ballistic carbon nanotube field-effect transistors. Nature 424:654–65710.1038/nature01797 ↗
6. Bandaru PR (2007) Electrical properties and applications of carbon nanotube structures. J Nanosci Nanotechnol 7:1–2910.1166/jnn.2007.307 ↗
7. Tombler TW, Zhou C, Alexseyev L, Kong J, Dai H, Liu L, Jayanthi CS, Tang M, Wu S-Y (2000) Reversible electromechanical characteristics of carbon nanotubes under local-probe manipulation. Nature 405:769–77210.1038/35015519 ↗
8. Li QW, Li Y, Zhang XF, Chikkannanavar SB, Zhao YH, Dangelewicz AM, Zheng LX, Doorn SK, Jia QX, Peterson DE, Arendt PN, Zhu YT (2007) Structure-dependent electrical properties of carbon nanotube fibers. Adv Mater 19:3358–336310.1002/adma.200602966 ↗
9. Vaisman L, Wagner HD, Marom G (2006) The role of surfactants in dispersion of carbon nanotubes. Adv Colloid Interface Sci 128–130:37–4610.1016/j.cis.2006.11.007 ↗
10. Loh KJ-H (2008) Development of multifunctional carbon nanotube nanocomposite sensors for structural health monitoring. PhD Dissertation, University of Michigan
11. Breuer O, Sundararaj U (2004) Big returns from small fibers: a review of polymer/carbon nanotube composites. Polym Compos 25:630–64510.1002/pc.20058 ↗
12. Blanco J, García EJ, Guzmán de Villoria R, Wardle BL (2009) Limiting mechanisms of mode I interlaminar toughening of composites reinforced with aligned carbon nanotubes. J Compos Mater 43:825–84110.1177/0021998309102398 ↗
13. Gojny FH, Wichmann MHG, Köpke U, Fiedler B, Schulte K (2004) Carbon nanotube-reinforced epoxy-composites: enhanced stiffness and fracture toughness at low nanotube content. Compos Sci Technol 64:2363–237110.1016/j.compscitech.2004.04.002 ↗
14. Qian D, Dickey EC, Andrews R, Rantell T (2000) Load transfer and deformation mechanisms in carbon nanotube-polystyrene composites. Appl Phys Lett 76:2868–287010.1063/1.126500 ↗
15. Dharap P, Li Z, Nagarajaiah S, Barrera EV (2004) Nanotube film based on single-wall carbon nanotubes for strain sensing. Nanotechnol 15:379–38210.1088/0957-4484/15/3/026 ↗
16. Li Z, Dharap P, Nagarajaiah S, Barrera EV, Kim JD (2004) Carbon nanotube film sensors. Adv Mater 16:640–64310.1002/adma.200306310 ↗
17. Kang I, Schulz MJ, Kim JH, Shanov V, Shi D (2006) A carbon nanotube strain sensor for structural health monitoring. Smart Mater Struct 15:737–74810.1088/0964-1726/15/3/009 ↗
18. Loh KJ, Kim J, Lynch JP, Kam NWS, Kotov NA (2007) Multifunctional layer-by-layer carbon nanotube–polyelectrolyte thin films for strain and corrosion sensing. Smart Mater Struct 16:429–43810.1088/0964-1726/16/2/022 ↗
19. Loh KJ, Lynch JP, Shim BS, Kotov NA (2008) Tailoring piezoresistive sensitivity of multilayer carbon nanotube composite strain sensors. JIMSS 19:747–764
20. Pham GT, Park YB, Liang Z, Zhang C, Wang B (2008) Processing and modeling of conductive thermoplastic/carbon nanotube films for strain sensing. Compos B 39:209–21610.1016/j.compositesb.2007.02.024 ↗
21. Park M, Kim H, Youngblood JP (2008) Strain-dependent electrical resistance of multi-walled carbon nanotube/polymer composite films. Nanotechnol 19:05570510.1088/0957-4484/19/05/055705 ↗
22. Loyola B, La Saponara V, Loh KJ (2010) In situ strain monitoring of fiber-reinforced polymers using embedded piezoresistive nanocomposites. JMSC 45:6786–6798. doi: 10.1007/s10853-010-4775-y10.1007/s10853-010-4775-y ↗
23. Kumar S, Murthy JY, Alam MA (2005) Percolating conduction in finite nanotube networks. Phys Rev Lett 95:06680210.1103/PhysRevLett.95.066802 ↗
24. Behnam A, Ural A (2007) Computational study of geometry-dependent resistivity scaling in single-walled carbon nanotube films. Phys Rev B 75:12543210.1103/PhysRevB.75.125432 ↗
25. Li C, Thostenson ET, Chou T-W (2008) Effect of nanotube waviness on the electrical conductivity of carbon nanotube-based composites. Compos Sci Technol 68:1445–145210.1016/j.compscitech.2007.10.056 ↗
26. Du F, Fischer JE, Winey KI (2005) Effect of nanotube alignment on percolation conductivity in carbon nanotube/polymer composites. Phys Rev B 72:12140410.1103/PhysRevB.72.121404 ↗
27. Bao WS, Meguid SA, Zhu ZH, Meguid MJ (2011) Modeling electrical conductivities of nanocomposites with aligned carbon nanotubes. Nanotechnol 22:48570410.1088/0957-4484/22/48/485704 ↗
28. Hu N, Karube Y, Yan C, Masuda Z, Fukunaga H (2008) Tunneling effect in a polymer/carbon nanotube nanocomposite strain sensor. Acta Mater 56:2929–293610.1016/j.actamat.2008.02.030 ↗
29. Hu N, Karube Y, Arai M, Watanabe T, Yan C, Li Y, Liu Y, Fukunaga H (2010) Investigation on sensitivity of a polymer/carbon nanotube composite strain sensor. Carbon 48:680–68710.1016/j.carbon.2009.10.012 ↗
30. Rahman R, Servati P (2012) Effects of inter-tube distance and alignment on tunnelling resistance and strain sensitivity of nanotube/polymer composite films. Nanotechnol 23:05570310.1088/0957-4484/23/5/055703 ↗
31. Amini A, Bahreyni B (2012) Behavioral model for electrical response and strain sensitivity of nanotube-based nanocomposite materials. J Vac Sci Technol B 30(2):02200110.1116/1.3691654 ↗
32. Wang Z, Ye X (2013) A numerical investigation on piezoresistive behaviour of carbon nanotube/polymer composites: mechanism and optimizing principle. Nanotechnol 24:26570410.1088/0957-4484/24/26/265704 ↗
33. Stampfer C, Jungen A, Linderman R, Obergfell D, Roth S, Hierold C (2006) Nano-electromechanical displacement sensing based on single-walled carbon nanotubes. Nano Lett 6:1449–145310.1021/nl0606527 ↗
34. Cullinan MA, Culpepper ML (2010) Carbon nanotubes as piezoresistive microelectromechanical sensors: theory and experiment. Phys Rev B 82:11542810.1103/PhysRevB.82.115428 ↗
35. Broadbent SR, Hammersley JM (1957) Percolation processes. MPCPS 53:629–641
36. Hammersley JM (1957) Percolation processes: lower bounds for the critical probability. Ann Math Stat 28:790–79510.1214/aoms/1177706894 ↗
37. Kirkpatrick S (1973) Percolation and conduction. Rev Mod Phys 45:574–58810.1103/RevModPhys.45.574 ↗
38. Lee BM, Loh KJ, Burton A, Loyola BR (2014) Modeling the electromechanical and strain response of carbon nanotube-based nanocomposites. Paper presented at the SPIE, San Diego10.1117/12.2044566 ↗
39. Odegard G (2009) Multiscale modeling of nanocomposite materials. In: Farahmand B (ed) Virtual testing and predictive modeling. Springer, New York, pp 221–245. doi: 10.1007/978-0-387-95924-5_810.1007/978-0-387-95924-5_8 ↗
40. Harper LT, Qian C, Turner TA, Li S, Warrior NA (2012) Representative volume elements for discontinuous carbon fibre composites—Part 1: boundary conditions. Compos Sci Technol 72:225–23410.1016/j.compscitech.2011.11.006 ↗
41. Kanit T, Forest S, Galliet I, Mounoury V, Jeulin D (2003) Determination of the size of the representative volume element for random composites: statistical and numerical approach. IJSS 40:3647–3679
42. Hill R (1963) Elastic properties of reinforced solids: some theoretical principles. J Mech Phys Solids 11:357–37210.1016/0022-5096(63)90036-X ↗
43. Alamusi, Hu N, Fukunaga H, Atobe S, Liu Y, Li J (2011) Piezoresistive strain sensors made from carbon nanotubes based polymer nanocomposites. Sensors 11:10691–1072310.3390/s111110691 ↗
44. Berhan L, Sastry AM (2007) Modeling percolation in high-aspect-ratio fiber systems. I. Soft-core versus hard-core models. Phys Rev E 75:04112010.1103/PhysRevE.75.041120 ↗
45. McEuen PL, Park JY (2004) Electron transport in single-walled carbon nanotubes. MRS Bull 29:272–27510.1557/mrs2004.79 ↗
46. Fuhrer MS, Nygård J, Shih L, Forero M, Yoon Y-G, Mazzoni MSC, Choi HJ, Ihm J, Louie SG, Zettl A, McEuen PL (2000) Crossed nanotube junctions. Science 288:494–49710.1126/science.288.5465.494 ↗
47. Nirmalraj PN, Lyons PE, De S, Coleman JN, Boland JJ (2009) Electrical connectivity in single-walled carbon nanotube networks. Nano Lett 9:3890–389510.1021/nl9020914 ↗
48. Jang H-S, Lee Y-H, Na H-J, Nahm SH (2008) Variation in electrical resistance versus strain of an individual multiwalled carbon nanotube. JAP 104(11):114304
49. Cao J, Wang Q, Dai H (2003) Electromechanical properties of metallic, quasimetallic, and semiconducting carbon nanotubes under stretching. Phys Rev Lett 90:15760110.1103/PhysRevLett.90.157601 ↗
50. Zeng X, Xu X, Shenai PM, Kovalev E, Baudot C, Mathews N, Zhao Y (2011) Characteristics of the electrical percolation in carbon nanotubes/polymer nanocomposites. J Phys Chem C 115:21685–2169010.1021/jp207388n ↗
51. Bauhofer W, Kovacs JZ (2009) A review and analysis of electrical percolation in carbon nanotube polymer composites. Compos Sci Technol 69:1486–149810.1016/j.compscitech.2008.06.018 ↗
52. Lee D, Hong HP, Lee CJ, Park CW, Min NK (2011) Microfabrication and characterization of spray-coated single-wall carbon nanotube film strain gauges. Nanotechnol 22:45530110.1088/0957-4484/22/45/455301 ↗
53. Li X, Levy C, Elaadil L (2008) Multiwalled carbon nanotube film for strain sensing. Nanotechnol 19:04550110.1088/0957-4484/19/04/045501 ↗
54. Jang JE, Cha SN, Choi Y, Amaratunga Gehan AJ, Kang DJ, Hasko DG, Jung JE, Kim JM (2005) Nanoelectromechanical switches with vertically aligned carbon nanotubes. Appl Phys Lett 87:16311410.1063/1.2077858 ↗