journal article·2007-08

Exploring the relationship between ferrite fraction and morphology and the electromagnetic properties of steel

W. Yin, A. J. Peyton, M. Strangwood, C. L. Davis

Journal of Materials Science· Volume 42· Issue 16
Publisher page

Abstract

The link between the electromagnetic properties of steel and its microstructure is a complex one, depending on both phase fractions and morphology. In this paper, both analytical and three-dimensional finite element (3D FEM) modelling techniques were applied to the prediction of permeability for steel with a given ferrite fraction for random ferrite/austenite distributions. Experimental measurements from a multi-frequency electromagnetic sensor on samples generated by hot isostatic pressing (HIPping) of powder mixtures were used to evaluate the analytical and FEM predictions. Theoretical treatment of the relationship between the sensor output and the effective permeability is also given; in particular, it was found that the zero crossing frequency of the real part of the inductance is approximately linearly related to the permeability for high (> 40%) ferrite percentages. The EM sensor can therefore be used to identify the samples across the full range (0-100%) of ferrite percentages using both the zero crossing frequency (> 40%) and trans-impedance (0-40%). The effect of banded (non-random) microstructures on sensor output and the prediction of the upper and lower bounds of permeability are also discussed. © Springer Science+Business Media, LLC 2007.
Source: openaire · Quality: candidate unverified · Source record ↗

Research context

OpenAlex topics: Non-Destructive Testing Techniques · Magnetic Properties and Applications · Ultrasonics and Acoustic Wave Propagation

SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.

References (17)

Show source-provided references
1. http://www.matweb.com as on 15.11.06
2. Davis CL, Papaelias MP, Strangwood M, Peyton AJ (2002) Ironmak Steelmak 29(6):46910.1179/030192302225004610 ↗
3. Papaelias MP, Strangwood M, Peyton AJ, Davis CL (2004) Metallur Mater Trans A 35A:96510.1007/s11661-004-1000-0 ↗
4. Haldane RJ, Yin W, Strangwood M, Peyton AJ, Davis CL (2006) Scripta Mat 54(10):176110.1016/j.scriptamat.2006.01.041 ↗
5. Maxwell JC (1873) In: Treatise on electricity and magnetism. Oxford Univ. Press, UK
6. Matijevic E (1971) Surface and colloid science, in dielectric properties of disperse systems, vol 3. Wiley-Interscience, New York, pp 83
7. Sherman P (1968) Emulsion science, in electrical properties of emulsions. London, U.K., Academic, pp 353
8. Pavlin M, Slivnik T, Miklavcic D (2002) IEEE Trans Bio Med Eng 49:7710.1109/10.972843 ↗
9. Pellegrini YP (2000) Phys Rev B 61:936510.1103/PhysRevB.61.9365 ↗
10. Birchak JR, Gardner LG, Hipp JW, Victor JM (1974) In: Proceedings of the IEEE 62:9310.1109/PROC.1974.9388 ↗
11. Looyenga H (1965) Physica 21:410
12. Dodd CV, Deeds WE (1968) J Appl Phys 39:282910.1063/1.1656680 ↗
13. Yin W, Binns R, Davis CL, Peyton AJ, Dickinson SJ (2002) In: Proceedings of the IEEE instrumentation and measurement technology Conference, Ottawa, Canada, May 2005, ISBN 0-7803-8880-1
14. Lorrain P, Corson D (1988) Electromagnetic fields and waves. Freeman, New York, pp 347
15. Maxwell user manual, Ansoft Corporation, 2001
16. Stainless Steels (1994) In: Davis JR (ed) ASM speciality handbook, pub. ASM International, ISBN 0-87170-503-6
17. Marcu Puscas T, Molinari A, Kazior J, Pieczonka T, Nykiel M (2001) Powder Metallur 44(1):4810.1179/003258901666167 ↗