journal article·2016-03

Failure processes governing high-rate impact resistance of epoxy resins filled with core–shell rubber nanoparticles

Erich D. Bain, Daniel B. Knorr, Adam D. Richardson, Kevin A. Masser, Jian Yu, Joseph L. Lenhart

Journal of Materials Science· Volume 51· Issue 5
Publisher page

Abstract

Epoxy resins are classically toughened by rubber additives, but the effectiveness of rubber toughening tends to diminish with increasing strain rate, decreasing temperature, and decreasing matrix ductility. In this study, we demonstrate that low loadings of 100–200-nm core–shell rubber (CSR) particulate additives can improve high strain rate (104–105 s−1) impact resistance by nearly 200 % for epoxy resins with glass transition temperatures T g in a range between 60 and 110 °C, without large reductions in T g or stiffness. In addition, CSR additives improve low-temperature impact resistance of the epoxies down to 0 °C. Size and surface chemistry of the CSR particles influence the ballistic response, with 200-nm diameter, weakly bound, and poorly dispersed CSR particles providing the greatest toughening performance at low filler loadings and high rates. Impact resistance for a systematic series of CSR-modified epoxies covers a transition from brittle to tough behavior, where the failure mechanism changes with effective fracture resistance. For brittle resins, failure is dominated by initiation of Hertzian cone fracture which depends strongly on fracture toughness K IC, while for tough resins, failure is dominated by plastic yield at the impact site and is independent of fracture toughness above a minimum K IC value of approximately 1.2–1.5 MPa m1/2. Interestingly, quasistatic mechanical properties are reasonably effective qualitative predictors of high-rate impact resistance, suggesting that the toughening mechanisms of CSR particles are similar over the rates studied here. The insights gained from this study are valuable for design of next generation adhesives, polymers, and polymer composite matrices for lightweight protective applications.
Source: openaire · Quality: candidate unverified · Source record ↗

Research context

OpenAlex topics: Epoxy Resin Curing Processes · Mechanical Behavior of Composites · Polymer crystallization and properties

SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.

References (100+)

Show source-provided references
1. Grossman E, Gouzman I (2003) Space environment effects on polymers in low earth orbit. Nucl Instrum Methods Phys Res Sect B 208:48–57. doi: 10.1016/s0168-583x(03)00640-210.1016/S0168-583X(03)00640-2 ↗
2. Committee on Opportunities in Protection Materials Science Technology for Future Army Applications, National Research Council (2011) Opportunities in protection materials science and technology for future army applications. The National Academies Press, Washington
3. Crawford E, Lesser AJ (1998) The effect of network architecture on the thermal and mechanical behavior of epoxy resins. J Polym Sci B 36(8):1371–1382. doi: 10.1002/(sici)1099-0488(199806)36:8<1371:aid-polb11>3.0.co;2-410.1002/(SICI)1099-0488(199806)36:8<1371::AID-POLB11>3.0.CO;2-4 ↗
4. Zee RH, Hsieh CY (1998) Energy absorption processes in fibrous composites. Mater Sci Eng A 246(1–2):161–168. doi: 10.1016/s0921-5093(97)00735-110.1016/S0921-5093(97)00735-1 ↗
5. Deka LJ, Bartus SD, Vaidya UK (2008) Damage evolution and energy absorption of E-glass/polypropylene laminates subjected to ballistic impact. J Mater Sci 43(13):4399–4410. doi: 10.1007/s10853-008-2595-010.1007/s10853-008-2595-0 ↗
6. Lin C, Fatt MSH (2006) Perforation of composite plates and sandwich panels under quasi-static and projectile loading. J Compos Mater 40(20):1801–1840. doi: 10.1177/002199830606017310.1177/0021998306060173 ↗
7. Naik NK, Shrirao P (2004) Composite structures under ballistic impact. Compos Struct 66(1–4):579–590. doi: 10.1016/j.compstruct.2004.05.00610.1016/j.compstruct.2004.05.006 ↗
8. Carrillo JG, Gamboa RA, Flores-Johnson EA, Gonzalez-Chi PI (2012) Ballistic performance of thermoplastic composite laminates made from aramid woven fabric and polypropylene matrix. Polym Testing 31(4):512–519. doi: 10.1016/j.polymertesting.2012.02.01010.1016/j.polymertesting.2012.02.010 ↗
9. Hsieh TH, Kinloch AJ, Masania K, Sohn Lee J, Taylor AC, Sprenger S (2009) The toughness of epoxy polymers and fibre composites modified with rubber microparticles and silica nanoparticles. J Mater Sci 45(5):1193–1210. doi: 10.1007/s10853-009-4064-910.1007/s10853-009-4064-9 ↗
10. Sprenger S (2013) Fiber-reinforced composites based on epoxy resins modified with elastomers and surface-modified silica nanoparticles. J Mater Sci 49(6):2391–2402. doi: 10.1007/s10853-013-7963-810.1007/s10853-013-7963-8 ↗
11. Barcikowski M, Krolikowski W (2013) Effect of resin modification on the impact strength of glass-polyester composites. Polimery 58(6):450–46010.14314/polimery.2013.450 ↗
12. David NV, Gao XL, Zheng JQ (2009) Ballistic resistant body armor: contemporary and prospective materials and related protection mechanisms. Appl Mech Rev 62(5):050802. doi: 10.1115/1.312464410.1115/1.3124644 ↗
13. Naik NK, Shankar PJ, Kavala VR, Ravikumar G, Pothnis JR, Arya H (2011) High strain rate mechanical behavior of epoxy under compressive loading: experimental and modeling studies. Mater Sci Eng A 528(3):846–854. doi: 10.1016/j.msea.2010.10.09910.1016/j.msea.2010.10.099 ↗
14. Knorr DB Jr, Yu JH, Richardson AD, Hindenlang MD, McAninch IM, La Scala JJ, Lenhart JL (2012) Glass transition dependence of ultrahigh strain rate response in amine cured epoxy resins. Polymer 53(25):5917–5923. doi: 10.1016/j.polymer.2012.09.05810.1016/j.polymer.2012.09.058 ↗
15. Masser KA, Knorr DB Jr, Hindenlang MD, Yu JH, Richardson AD, Strawhecker KE, Beyer FL, Lenhart JL (2015) Relating structure and chain dynamics to ballistic performance in transparent epoxy networks exhibiting nanometer scale heterogeneity. Polymer 58:96–106. doi: 10.1016/j.polymer.2014.12.02710.1016/j.polymer.2014.12.027 ↗
16. Knorr DB, Masser KA, Elder RM, Sirk TW, Hindenlang MD, Yu JH, Richardson AD, Boyd SE, Spurgeon WA, Lenhart JL (2015) Overcoming the structural versus energy dissipation trade-off in highly crosslinked polymer networks: ultrahigh strain rate response in polydicyclopentadiene. Compos Sci Technol 114:17–2510.1016/j.compscitech.2015.03.021 ↗
17. McGarry FJ (1970) Building design with fibre reinforced materials. Proc R Soc Lond A 319(1536):59–6810.1098/rspa.1970.0165 ↗
18. Kinloch AJ, Shaw SJ, Tod DA, Hunston DL (1983) Deformation and fracture behaviour of a rubber-toughened epoxy: 1. Microstructure and fracture studies. Polymer 24:1341–135410.1016/0032-3861(83)90070-8 ↗
19. Yee AF, Pearson RA (1986) Toughening mechanisms in elastomer-modified epoxies Part 1 mechanical studies. J Mater Sci 21:2462–2474. doi: 10.1007/BF0111429310.1007/BF01114293 ↗
20. Spanoudakis J, Young RJ (1984) Crack propagation in a glass particle-filled epoxy resin Part 1—effect of particle volume fraction and size. J Mater Sci 19:473–486. doi: 10.1007/BF0240323410.1007/BF02403234 ↗
21. Hsieh TH, Kinloch AJ, Masania K, Taylor AC, Sprenger S (2010) The mechanisms and mechanics of the toughening of epoxy polymers modified with silica nanoparticles. Polymer 51(26):6284–6294. doi: 10.1016/j.polymer.2010.10.04810.1016/j.polymer.2010.10.048 ↗
22. McGrath LM, Parnas RS, King SH, Schroeder JL, Fischer DA, Lenhart JL (2008) Investigation of the thermal, mechanical, and fracture properties of alumina-epoxy composites. Polymer 49(4):999–1014. doi: 10.1016/j.polymer.2007.12.01410.1016/j.polymer.2007.12.014 ↗
23. Sue HJ, Garcia-Meitin EI, Pickelman DM, Yang PC (1993) Optimization of mode-I fracture toughness of high-performance epoxies by using designed core-shell rubber particles. Adv Chem Ser 233:259–29110.1021/ba-1993-0233.ch010 ↗
24. Blanco M, López M, De Arcaya PA, Ramos JA, Kortaberria G, Riccardi CC, Mondragon I (2009) Thermoplastic-modified epoxy resins cured with different functionalities amine mixtures: morphology, thermal behavior, and mechanical properties. J Appl Polym Sci 114(3):1753–1760. doi: 10.1002/app.3061610.1002/app.30616 ↗
25. Fischer M (1992) Properties and failure of polymers with tailored distances between cross-links. Adv Polym Sci 100:313–35510.1007/BFb0051639 ↗
26. Garg AC, Mai YW (1988) Failure mechanisms in toughened epoxy resins—a review. Compos Sci Technol 31(3):179–223. doi: 10.1016/0266-3538(88)90009-710.1016/0266-3538(88)90009-7 ↗
27. Bagheri R, Marouf BT, Pearson RA (2009) Rubber-toughened epoxies: a critical review. Polym Rev 49(3):201–225. doi: 10.1080/1558372090304822710.1080/15583720903048227 ↗
28. Pearson RA, Yee AF (1986) Toughening mechanisms in elastomer-modified epoxies. Part 2—microscopy studies. J Mater Sci 21:2475–2488. doi: 10.1007/BF0111429410.1007/BF01114294 ↗
29. Pearson RA, Yee AF (1989) Toughening mechanisms in elastomer-modified epoxies 3. The effect of cross-link density. J Mater Sci 24(7):2571–2580. doi: 10.1007/bf0117452810.1007/BF01174528 ↗
30. Dean JM, Lipic PM, Grubs RB, Cook RF, Bates FS (2001) Micellar structure and mechanical properties of block copolymer-modified epoxies. J Polym Sci B 39:2996–301010.1002/polb.10062 ↗
31. Liu J, Hung-Jue S, Thompson ZJ, Bates FS, Dettloff M, Jacob G, Verghese N, Ha P (2009) Strain rate effect on toughening of nano-sized PEP-PEO block copolymer modified epoxy. Acta Mater 57(9):2691–2701. doi: 10.1016/j.actamat.2009.02.02310.1016/j.actamat.2009.02.023 ↗
32. Liu J, Sue HJ, Thompson ZJ, Bates FS, Dettloff M, Jacob G, Verghese N, Pham H (2008) Nanocavitation in self-assembled amphiphilic block copolymer-modified epoxy. Macromolecules 41:7616–762410.1021/ma801037q ↗
33. Thompson ZJ, Hillmyer MA, Liu J, Sue HJ, Dettloff M, Bates FS (2009) Block copolymer toughened epoxy—role of crosslink density. Macromolecules 42:2333–233510.1021/ma900061b ↗
34. Sue HJ, Meitin EIG, Pickelman DM, Bott CJ (1996) Fracture mechanisms in rigid core-shell particle modified high performance epoxies. Colloid Polym Sci 274(4):342–349. doi: 10.1007/bf0065405410.1007/BF00654054 ↗
35. Bagheri R, Pearson RA (1996) Role of blend morphology in rubber-toughened polymers. J Mater Sci 31:3945–3954. doi: 10.1007/BF0035265510.1007/BF00352655 ↗
36. Lu F, Plummer CJG, Cantwell WJ, Kausch HH (1996) Toughening mechanisms in modified epoxy resins with different crosslink densities. Polym Bull 37(3):399–406. doi: 10.1007/bf0031807410.1007/BF00318074 ↗
37. Kunz-Douglass S, Beaumont PWR, Ashby MF (1980) A model for the toughness of epoxy-rubber particulate composites. J Mater Sci 15:1109–1123. doi: 10.1007/BF0055179910.1007/BF00551799 ↗
38. Pearson RA, Yee AF (1993) Toughening mechanisms in thermoplastic-modified epoxies: 1. Modification using PPO. Polymer 34(17):3658–367010.1016/0032-3861(93)90051-B ↗
39. Huang Y, Kinloch AJ (1992) Modeling of the toughening mechanisms in rubber-modified epoxy polymers Part I. Finite element analysis studies. J Mater Sci 27:2753–2762. doi: 10.1007/BF0054070210.1007/BF00540702 ↗
40. Huang Y, Kinloch AJ (1992) Modelling of the toughening mechanisms in rubber-modified epoxy polymers Part II—A quantitative description of the microstructure-fracture property relationships. J Mater Sci 27:2763–2769. doi: 10.1007/BF0054070310.1007/BF00540703 ↗
41. Sun L, Gibson RF, Gordaninejad F, Suhr J (2009) Energy absorption capability of nanocomposites: a review. Compos Sci Technol 69(14):2392–2409. doi: 10.1016/j.compscitech.2009.06.02010.1016/j.compscitech.2009.06.020 ↗
42. Arias ML, Frontini PM, Williams RJJ (2003) Analysis of the damage zone around the crack tip for two rubber-modified epoxy matrices exhibiting different toughenability. Polymer 44(5):1537–1546. doi: 10.1016/s0032-3861(02)00829-710.1016/S0032-3861(02)00829-7 ↗
43. Bagheri R, Pearson RA (1996) Role of particle cavitation in rubber-toughened epoxies: 1. Microvoid toughening. Polymer 37(20):4529–4538. doi: 10.1016/0032-3861(96)00295-910.1016/0032-3861(96)00295-9 ↗
44. Bagheri R, Pearson RA (1995) The use of microvoids to toughen polymers. Polymer 36(25):4883–4885. doi: 10.1016/0032-3861(95)99306-F10.1016/00323-8619(59)9306F- ↗
45. Aizpurua B, Franco M, Corcuera MA, Riccardi CC, Mondragon I (2000) Chemorheology and ultimate behavior of epoxy-amine mixtures modified with a liquid oligomer. J Appl Polym Sci 76(8):1269–127910.1002/(SICI)1097-4628(20000523)76:8<1269::AID-APP7>3.0.CO;2-Q ↗
46. Perkins WG (1999) Polymer toughness and impact resistance. Polym Eng Sci 39(12):2445–2460. doi: 10.1002/pen.1163210.1002/pen.11632 ↗
47. Bradley WL, Schultz W, Corleto C, Komatsu S (1993) The synergistic effect of cross-link density and rubber additions on the fracture toughness of polymers. Adv Chem Ser 233:317–33410.1021/ba-1993-0233.ch013 ↗
48. Raghavan D, He J, Hunston D, Hoffman D (2002) Strain rate dependence of fracture in a rubber-toughened epoxy system. J Adhes 78(8):723–739. doi: 10.1080/0021846029001045810.1080/00218460213493 ↗
49. Cardwell BJ, Yee AF (1993) Rate and temperature effects on the fracture toughness of a rubber-modified epoxy. Polymer 34(8):1695–170110.1016/0032-3861(93)90329-9 ↗
50. Sherman D, Brandon DG (1997) The ballistic failure mechanisms and sequence in semi-infinite supported alumina tiles. J Mater Res 12:1335–134310.1557/JMR.1997.0182 ↗
51. Compton BG, Gamble EA, Zok FW (2013) Failure initiation during impact of metal spheres onto ceramic targets. Int J Impact Eng 55:11–23. doi: 10.1016/j.ijimpeng.2012.12.00210.1016/j.ijimpeng.2012.12.002 ↗
52. Seagraves AN, Radovitzky RA (2013) An analytical theory for radial crack propagation: application to spherical indentation. J Appl Mech 80:041018. doi: 10.1115/1.400779510.1115/1.4007795 ↗
53. Gilat A, Goldberg RK, Roberts GD (2002) Experimental study of strain-rate-dependent behavior of carbon/epoxy composite. Compos Sci Technol 62(10–11):1469–1476. doi: 10.1016/s0266-3538(02)00100-810.1016/S0266-3538(02)00100-8 ↗
54. Hosur MV, Alexander J, Vaidya UK, Jeelani S (2001) High strain rate compression response of carbon/epoxy laminate composites. Compos Struct 52(3–4):405–417. doi: 10.1016/s0263-8223(01)00031-910.1016/S0263-8223(01)00031-9 ↗
55. Guo Y, Li Y (2007) Quasi-static/dynamic response of SiO2-epoxy nanocomposites. Mater Sci Eng A 458(1–2):330–335. doi: 10.1016/j.msea.2007.02.01110.1016/j.msea.2007.02.011 ↗
56. Gomez-del Rio T, Rodriguez J, Pearson RA (2014) Compressive properties of nanoparticle modified epoxy resin at different strain rates. Compos B 57:173–179. doi: 10.1016/j.compositesb.2013.10.00210.1016/j.compositesb.2013.10.002 ↗
57. Lee JH, Veysset D, Singer JP, Retsch M, Saini G, Pezeril T, Nelson KA, Thomas EL (2012) High strain rate deformation of layered nanocomposites. Nat Commun 3:1164. doi: 10.1038/ncomms216610.1038/ncomms2166 ↗
58. Sirk TW, Karim M, Khare KS, Lenhart JL, Andzelm JW, Khare R (2015) Bi-modal polymer networks: composition-dependent trends in thermal, volumetric and structural properties from molecular dynamics simulation. Polymer 58:199–208. doi: 10.1016/j.polymer.2014.12.05710.1016/j.polymer.2014.12.057 ↗
59. US Department of Defense (1997). V50 ballistic test for armor MIL-STD-662F
60. Bogoslovov RB, Roland CM, Gamache RM (2007) Impact-induced glass transition in elastomeric coatings. Appl Phys Lett. doi: 10.1063/1.274521210.1063/1.2745212 ↗
61. Roland CM (2006) Mechanical behavior of rubber at high strain rates. Rubber Chem Technol 79(3):429–459. doi: 10.5254/1.354794510.5254/1.3547945 ↗
62. Roland CM, Fragiadakis D, Gamache RM (2010) Elastomer-steel laminate armor. Compos Struct 92(5):1059–1064. doi: 10.1016/j.compstruct.2009.09.05710.1016/j.compstruct.2009.09.057 ↗
63. Roland CM, Fragiadakis D, Gamache RM, Casalini R (2013) Factors influencing the ballistic impact resistance of elastomer-coated metal substrates. Phil Mag 93(5):468–477. doi: 10.1080/14786435.2012.72223510.1080/14786435.2012.722235 ↗
64. Franco M, Corcuera MA, Gavalda J, Valea A, Mondragon I (1997) Influence of curing conditions on the morphology and physical properties of epoxy resins modified with a liquid polyamine. J Polym Sci B 35(2):233–240. doi: 10.1002/(sici)1099-0488(19970130)35:2<233:aid-polb4>3.0.co;2-t10.1002/(SICI)1099-0488(19970130)35:2<233::AID-POLB4>3.0.CO;2-T ↗
65. Dorigato A, Pegoretti A (2011) The role of alumina nanoparticles in epoxy adhesives. J Nanopart Res 13(6):2429–2441. doi: 10.1007/s11051-010-0130-010.1007/s11051-010-0130-0 ↗
66. Garcia FG, Soares BG, Pita VJRR, Sánchez R, Rieumont J (2007) Mechanical properties of epoxy networks based on DGEBA and aliphatic amines. J Appl Polym Sci 106(3):2047–2055. doi: 10.1002/app.2489510.1002/app.24895 ↗
67. Kishi H, Kunimitsu Y, Imade J, Oshita S, Morishita Y, Asada M (2011) Nano-phase structures and mechanical properties of epoxy/acryl triblock copolymer alloys. Polymer 52(3):760–768. doi: 10.1016/j.polymer.2010.12.02510.1016/j.polymer.2010.12.025 ↗
68. Kim BC, Park SW, Lee DG (2008) Fracture toughness of the nano-particle reinforced epoxy composite. Compos Struct 86(1–3):69–77. doi: 10.1016/j.compstruct.2008.03.00510.1016/j.compstruct.2008.03.005 ↗
69. Le Q-H, Kuan H-C, Dai J-B, Zaman I, Luong L, Ma J (2010) Structure-property relations of 55 nm particle-toughened epoxy. Polymer 51(21):4867–4879. doi: 10.1016/j.polymer.2010.08.03810.1016/j.polymer.2010.08.038 ↗
70. Ma J, Mo MS, Du XS, Rosso P, Friedrich K, Kuan HC (2008) Effect of inorganic nanoparticles on mechanical property, fracture toughness and toughening mechanism of two epoxy systems. Polymer 49(16):3510–3523. doi: 10.1016/j.polymer.2008.05.04310.1016/j.polymer.2008.05.043 ↗
71. Zaman I, Phan TT, Kuan H-C, Meng Q, La LTB, Luong L, Youssf O, Ma J (2011) Epoxy/graphene platelets nanocomposites with two levels of interface strength. Polymer 52(7):1603–1611. doi: 10.1016/j.polymer.2011.02.00310.1016/j.polymer.2011.02.003 ↗
72. Zaman I, Le Q-H, Kuan H-C, Kawashima N, Luong L, Gerson A, Ma J (2011) Interface-tuned epoxy/clay nanocomposites. Polymer 52(2):497–504. doi: 10.1016/j.polymer.2010.12.00710.1016/j.polymer.2010.12.007 ↗
73. Hsieh TH, Kinloch AJ, Taylor AC, Sprenger S (2011) The effect of silica nanoparticles and carbon nanotubes on the toughness of a thermosetting epoxy polymer. J Appl Polym Sci 119(4):2135–2142. doi: 10.1002/app.3293710.1002/app.32937 ↗
74. Liang YL, Pearson RA (2009) Toughening mechanisms in epoxy–silica nanocomposites (ESNs). Polymer 50(20):4895–4905. doi: 10.1016/j.polymer.2009.08.01410.1016/j.polymer.2009.08.014 ↗
75. Perez RM, Sandler JKW, Altstadt V, Hoffmann T, Pospiech D, Artner J, Ciesielskil M, Doring M, Balabanovich AI, Knoll U, Braun U, Schartel B (2007) Novel phosphorus-containing hardeners with tailored chemical structures for epoxy resins: synthesis and cured resin properties. J Appl Polym Sci 105(5):2744–2759. doi: 10.1002/app.2653710.1002/app.26537 ↗
76. Sun L, Warren GL, Davis D, Sue HJ (2011) Nylon toughened epoxy/SWCNT composites. J Mater Sci 46(1):207–214. doi: 10.1007/s10853-010-4921-610.1007/s10853-010-4921-6 ↗
77. Boo WJ, Sun L, Liu J, Moghbelli E, Clearfield A, Sue H-J, Pham H, Verghese N (2007) Effect of nanoplatelet dispersion on mechanical behavior of polymer nanocomposites. J Polym Sci B 45(12):1459–1469. doi: 10.1002/polb.2116310.1002/polb.21163 ↗
78. Deng S, Zhang J, Ye L (2009) Halloysite-epoxy nanocomposites with improved particle dispersion through ball mill homogenisation and chemical treatments. Compos Sci Technol 69(14):2497–2505. doi: 10.1016/j.compscitech.2009.07.00110.1016/j.compscitech.2009.07.001 ↗
79. Tang Y, Deng S, Ye L, Yang C, Yuan Q, Zhang J, Zhao C (2011) Effects of unfolded and intercalated halloysites on mechanical properties of halloysite–epoxy nanocomposites. Compos A Appl Sci Manuf 42(4):345–354. doi: 10.1016/j.compositesa.2010.12.00310.1016/j.compositesa.2010.12.003 ↗
80. Deng S, Zhang J, Ye L, Wu J (2008) Toughening epoxies with halloysite nanotubes. Polymer 49(23):5119–5127. doi: 10.1016/j.polymer.2008.09.02710.1016/j.polymer.2008.09.027 ↗
81. Deng S, Ye L, Friedrich K (2007) Fracture behaviours of epoxy nanocomposites with nano-silica at low and elevated temperatures. J Mater Sci 42(8):2766–2774. doi: 10.1007/s10853-006-1420-x10.1007/s10853-006-1420-x ↗
82. Zhang J, Guo Q, Fox B (2010) Thermal and mechanical properties of a dendritic hydroxyl-functional hyperbranched polymer and tetrafunctional epoxy resin blends. J Polym Sci B 48(4):417–424. doi: 10.1002/polb.2190210.1002/polb.21902 ↗
83. Hu D, Zheng S (2011) Morphology and thermomechanical properties of epoxy thermosets modified with polysulfone-block-polydimethylsiloxane multiblock copolymer. J Appl Polym Sci 119(5):2933–2944. doi: 10.1002/app.3297710.1002/app.32977 ↗
84. Yang X, Yi F, Xin Z, Zheng S (2009) Morphology and mechanical properties of nanostructured blends of epoxy resin with poly(ɛ-caprolactone)-block-poly(butadiene-co-acrylonitrile)-block-poly(ɛ-caprolactone) triblock copolymer. Polymer 50(16):4089–4100. doi: 10.1016/j.polymer.2009.06.03010.1016/j.polymer.2009.06.030 ↗
85. McAninch IM, Palmese GR, Lenhart JL, La Scala JJ (2013) Characterization of epoxies cured with bimodal blends of polyetheramines. J Appl Polym Sci 130(3):1621–1631. doi: 10.1002/app.3932210.1002/app.39322 ↗
86. Lawn BR (1998) Indentation of ceramics with spheres: a century after Hertz. J Am Ceram Soc 81:1977–199410.1111/j.1151-2916.1998.tb02580.x ↗
87. van der Sanden MCM, Meijer HEH (1993) Deformation and toughness of polymeric systems 3. Influence of cross-link density. Polymer 34(24):5063–5072. doi: 10.1016/0032-3861(93)90249-a10.1016/0032-3861(93)90249-A ↗
88. Charlesworth JM (1988) Effect of crosslink density on molecular relaxations in diepoxide-diamine network polymers 2. The rubbery plateau region. Polym Eng Sci 28(4):230–236. doi: 10.1002/pen.76028040610.1002/pen.760280406 ↗
89. Sherman D (2000) Impact failure mechanisms in alumina tiles on finite thickness support and the effect of confinement. Int J Impact Eng 24:313–32810.1016/S0734-743X(99)00147-5 ↗
90. Sherman D, Ben-Shushan T (1998) Quasi-static impact damage in confined ceramic tiles. Int J Impact Eng 21:245–26510.1016/S0734-743X(97)00063-8 ↗
91. Rhee Y-W, Kim H-W, Deng Y, Lawn BR (2001) Brittle fracture versus quasi plasticity in ceramics: a simple predictive index. J Am Ceram Soc 84:561–56510.1111/j.1151-2916.2001.tb00698.x ↗
92. Ravi-Chandar K, Knauss WG (1984) An experimental investigation into dynamic fracture: III. On steady-state crack propagation and crack branching. Int J Fract 26:141–15410.1007/BF01157550 ↗
93. Sharon E, Gross SP, Fineberg J (1996) Energy dissipation in dynamic fracture. Phys Rev Lett 76(12):2117–212010.1103/PhysRevLett.76.2117 ↗
94. Rahman M, Michelitsch T (2006) A note on the formula for the Rayleigh wave speed. Wave Motion 43(3):272–276. doi: 10.1016/j.wavemoti.2005.10.00210.1016/j.wavemoti.2005.10.002 ↗
95. Rosakis AJ, Samudrala O, Coker D (1999) Cracks faster than the shear wave speed. Science 284:1337–134010.1126/science.284.5418.1337 ↗
96. Sultan JN, McGarry FJ (1973) Effect of rubber particle size on deformation mechanisms in glassy epoxy. Polym Eng Sci 13(1):29–3410.1002/pen.760130105 ↗
97. Qian JY, Pearson RA, Dimonie VL, Shaffer OL, El-Aasser MS (1997) The role of dispersed phase morphology on toughening of epoxies. Polymer 38(1):21–3010.1016/S0032-3861(96)00492-2 ↗
98. Cantwell WJ, Roulin-Moloney AC (1988) Fractography of unfilled and particulate-filled epoxy resins. J Mater Sci 23:1615–1631. doi: 10.1007/BF0111570010.1007/BF01115700 ↗
99. Iwamoto T, Nagai T, Sawa T (2010) Experimental and computational investigations on strain rate sensitivity and deformation behavior of bulk materials made of epoxy resin structural adhesive. Int J Solids Struct 47:175–185. doi: 10.1016/j.ijsolstr.2009.09.02610.1016/j.ijsolstr.2009.09.026 ↗
100. Gerlach R, Siviour CR, Petrinic N, Wiegand J (2008) Experimental characterisation and constitutive modelling of RTM-6 resin under impact loading. Polymer 49:2728–2737. doi: 10.1016/j.polymer.2008.04.01810.1016/j.polymer.2008.04.018 ↗