journal article·2013-05

Viscoelasticity and compaction behaviour of the foam-like pomelo (Citrus maxima) peel

Marc Thielen, Thomas Speck, Robin Seidel

Journal of Materials Science· Volume 48· Issue 9
Publisher page

Abstract

The pomelo (Citrus maxima) is the largest and heaviest fruit of the genus Citrus and can acquire considerable potential energy as it ripens hanging up to 15 m height. Its thick foam-like structured peel presumably acts inter alia as a shock absorbing layer, protecting the fruit as it impacts on the ground upon being shed. Thereby the peel dissipates kinetic energy by being compacted. In order to elucidate the compaction mechanism of the highly heterogeneous pomelo peel, we conducted incremental stress relaxation tests. Two different models describing the stress relaxation curves, namely, the well-known Maxwell model and the Peleg model were compared and found to be suitable to describe the stress relaxation. As the Peleg model involves only two constants describing the relaxation curves it was the method of choice for interpreting the compaction of the peel samples. The inverse of k 1 reflects the initial decay rate of the relaxation process and k 2 is a measure of the samples’ solidity. The behaviour of these constants with increasing strain indicates the strong influence of the peel samples’ geometry and composition which is attributed to the fruit shape, a gradual changing density of the peel, which can be considered as a stacked array of foam layers differing in density, and the turgescence of the biological cells.
Source: openaire · Quality: candidate unverified · Source record ↗

Research context

OpenAlex topics: Plant Surface Properties and Treatments · Postharvest Quality and Shelf Life Management · Polysaccharides Composition and Applications

SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.

References (37)

Show source-provided references
1. Scora RW, Nicolson DH (1986) Taxon 35:59210.2307/1221927 ↗
2. Moore GA (2001) Trends Genet 17:53610.1016/S0168-9525(01)02442-8 ↗
3. Gross J, Timberg R, Graef M (1983) Bot Gaz 144:40110.1086/337389 ↗
4. Scott FM, Baker KC (1947) Bot Gaz 108:45910.1086/335434 ↗
5. Hejnowicz Z, Barthlott W (2005) Am J Bot 92:39110.3732/ajb.92.3.391 ↗
6. Ford ES (1942) Bot Gaz 104:28810.1086/335133 ↗
7. Roth I (1977) In: Linsbauer K (ed) Handbuch der pflanzenanatomie spezieller teil, band X, teil 1—anatomy and morphology. Borntraeger, Berlin
8. Underhill SJR, McLauchlan RL, Dahler JM (1998) J Texture Stud 29:43710.1111/j.1745-4603.1998.tb00815.x ↗
9. Fischer SF, Thielen M, Loprang RR, Seidel R, Fleck C, Speck T, Bührig-Polaczek A (2010) Adv Eng Mater 12:B65810.1002/adem.201080065 ↗
10. Barrett HC, Rhodes AM (1976) Syst Bot 1:10510.2307/2418763 ↗
11. Morton JF (1987) Fruits of warm climates. Creative Resource Systems, Inc., Winterville
12. Seidel R, Bührig-Polaczek A, Fleck C, Speck T (2009) Impact resistance of hierarchically structured fruit walls and nut shells in view of biomimetic applications. In: Thibaut B (ed) Proceedings of the 6th plant biomechanics conference. ECOFOG, Cayenne
13. Gyasi S, Fridley RB, Chen P (1981) Trans ASABE 24:074710.13031/2013.34332 ↗
14. Chuma Y, Shiga T, Iwamoto M (1978) J Texture Stud 9:46110.1111/j.1745-4603.1978.tb01218.x ↗
15. Sarig Y, Orlovsky S (1974) J Texture Stud 5:33910.1111/j.1745-4603.1974.tb01440.x ↗
16. Singh KK, Reddy BS (2005) J Food Eng 73:11210.1016/j.jfoodeng.2005.01.010 ↗
17. Dal Fabbro IM, Linares AW, Abraão RF (2001) Acta Hort 2001(562):31910.17660/ActaHortic.2001.562.37 ↗
18. Fluck RC, Ahmed EM (1974) J Texture Stud 4:49410.1111/j.1745-4603.1974.tb00859.x ↗
19. Sarig Y (1991) Int J Impact Eng 11:25110.1016/0734-743X(91)90038-H ↗
20. Pollak N, Peleg M (1980) J Food Sci 45:82510.1111/j.1365-2621.1980.tb07459.x ↗
21. Miltz J, Ramon O (1986) Polym Eng Sci 26:130510.1002/pen.760261904 ↗
22. Peleg M, Pollak N (1982) J Texture Stud 13:110.1111/j.1745-4603.1982.tb00873.x ↗
23. Niklas KJ (1992) Plant biomechanics—an engineering approach to plant form and function. University of Chicago Press, Chicago
24. Peleg M (1979) J Food Sci 44:27710.1111/j.1365-2621.1979.tb10062.x ↗
25. Peleg M (1980) J Rheol 24:45110.1122/1.549567 ↗
26. Purkayastha S, Peleg M (1986) J Texture Stud 17:43310.1111/j.1745-4603.1986.tb00563.x ↗
27. R Development Core Team (2011) R: A Language and Environment for Statistical Computing. R Foundation for Statistical Computing, Vienna
28. Martone PT, Boller M, Burgert I, Dumais J, Edwards J, Mach K, Rowe N, Rueggeberg M, Seidel R, Speck T (2010) Integr Comp Biol 50:88810.1093/icb/icq122 ↗
29. Corradini MG, Peleg M (2008) In: Aguilera JM, Lillford PJ (eds) Food materials science—principles and practice. Springer, New York
30. Ben-Zion O, Nussinovitch A (1997) Food Hydrocolloid 11:25310.1016/S0268-005X(97)80054-9 ↗
31. Moghimi A, Saiedirad MH, Moghadam EG (2011) Int J Food Sci Technol 46:85510.1111/j.1365-2621.2011.02563.x ↗
32. Peleg M, Normand MD (1983) Rheol Acta 22:10810.1007/BF01679835 ↗
33. Lee YC, Rosenau JR, Peleg M (1983) J Texture Stud 14:14310.1111/j.1745-4603.1983.tb00340.x ↗
34. Peleg M (1997) Food Sci Technol Int 3:22710.1177/108201329700300401 ↗
35. Niklas KJ (1989) Am J Bot 76:92910.2307/2444549 ↗
36. Gibson LJ, Ashby MF, Harley BA (2010) Cellular materials in nature and medicine. University Press, Cambridge
37. Nilsson SB, Hertz CH, Falk S (1958) Physiol Plantarum 11:81810.1111/j.1399-3054.1958.tb08275.x ↗