journal article·2015-11

Surface tension and density data for Fe–Cr–Mo, Fe–Cr–Ni, and Fe–Cr–Mn–Ni steels

Tobias Dubberstein, Hans-Peter Heller, Jens Klostermann, Rüdiger Schwarze, Jürgen Brillo

Journal of Materials Science· Volume 50· Issue 22
Publisher page

Abstract

The temperature dependence of surface tension and density for Fe–Cr–Mo (AISI 4142), Fe–Cr–Ni (AISI 304), and Fe–Cr–Mn–Ni TRIP/TWIP high-manganese (16 wt% Cr, 7 wt% Mn, and 3–9 wt% Ni) liquid alloys are investigated using the conventional maximum bubble pressure (MBP) and sessile drop (SD) methods. In addition, the surface tension of liquid steel is measured using the oscillating droplet method on electromagnetically levitated (EML) liquid droplets at the German Aerospace Centre (DLR, Cologne). The data of thermophysical properties for Fe–Cr–Mn–Ni is of major importance for modeling of infiltration and gas atomization processes in the prototyping of a “TRIP-Matrix-Composite.” The surface tension of TRIP/TWIP steel increased with an increase in temperature in MBP as well as in SD measurement. The manganese evaporation with the conventional measurement methods is not significantly high within the experiments (∆Mn < 0.5 %). The temperature coefficient of surface tension (dσ/dT) is positive for liquid steel samples, which can be explained by the concentration of surface active elements. A slight influence of nickel on the surface tension of Fe–Cr–Mn–Ni steel was experimentally observed where σ is decreased with increasing nickel content. EML measurement of high-manganese steel, however, is limited to the undercooling state of the liquid steel. The manganese evaporation strongly increased in excess of the liquidus temperature in levitation measurements and a mass loss of droplet of 5 % was observed.
Source: openaire · Quality: candidate unverified · Source record ↗

Research context

OpenAlex topics: Microstructure and Mechanical Properties of Steels · Metal Alloys Wear and Properties · Metal and Thin Film Mechanics

SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.

References (43)

Show source-provided references
1. Biermann H, Martin U, Aneziris CG et al (2009) Microstructure and compression strength of novel TRIP-steel/Mg-PSZ composites. Adv Eng Mater 11:1000–100610.1002/adem.200900210 ↗
2. Aneziris CG, Schärfl W, Biermann H, Martin U (2009) Energy-absorbing TRIP-Steel/Mg-PSZ composite honeycomb structures based on ceramic extrusion at room temperature. Int J Appl Ceram Technol 6:727–73510.1111/j.1744-7402.2008.02321.x ↗
3. Bouaziz O, Allain S, Scott CP et al (2011) High manganese austenitic twinning induced plasticity steels: a review of the microstructure properties relationships. Curr Opin Solid State Mater Sci 15:141–16810.1016/j.cossms.2011.04.002 ↗
4. Jahn A, Steinhoff K-P, Dubberstein T et al (2013) Phosphor alloyed Cr–Mn–Ni austenitic As-cast stainless steel with TRIP/TWIP effect. Steel Res Int. 85:477–485. doi: 10.1002/srin.20130011410.1002/srin.201300114 ↗
5. Klostermann J, Schwarze R, Weider M, Brücker C (2011) Computational fluid dynamic (CFD) simulations of liquid steel infiltration in ceramic foam structures. Part II: application to laboratory-scale experiments. Steel Res Int 82:1113–1121. doi: 10.1002/srin.20110009310.1002/srin.201100093 ↗
6. Dubberstein T, Heller H-P (2013) Effect of surface tension on gas atomization of a CrMnNi steel alloy. Steel Res Int 84:845–851. doi: 10.1002/srin.20120032110.1002/srin.201200321 ↗
7. Buchwalder A, Rüthrich K, Zenker R, Biermann H (2013) Electron beam welding of high alloy CrMnNi cast steels with TRIP/TWIP effect. Adv Eng Mater 15:566–57010.1002/adem.201200355 ↗
8. Aneziris CG, Jahn A, Weider M, Schärfl W (2010) Refractory materials for casting manganese alloyed. Ref World Forum 2:81–86
9. Brooks RF, Quested PN (2005) The surface tension of steels. J Mater Sci 40:2233–2238. doi: 10.1007/s10853-005-1939-210.1007/s10853-005-1939-2 ↗
10. Mills KC, Keene BJ, Brooks RF, Shirali A (1998) Marangoni effects in welding. Philos Trans R Soc A 356:911–92510.1098/rsta.1998.0196 ↗
11. Egry I, Brillo J (2009) Surface tension and density of liquid metallic alloys measured by electromagnetic levitation. J Chem Eng Data 54:2347–2352. doi: 10.1021/je900119n10.1021/je900119n ↗
12. Brillo J, Lohofer G, Schmidt-Hohagen F, Schneider S (2006) Thermophysical property measurements of liquid metals by electromagnetic levitation. Int J Mater Prod Technol 26:247–27310.1504/IJMPT.2006.009469 ↗
13. Brillo J, Egry I (2011) Density of multicomponent melts measured by electromagnetic levitation. Jpn J Appl Phys 50:11RD02. doi: 10.1143/JJAP.50.11RD0210.7567/JJAP.50.11RD02 ↗
14. Shimoji M (1977) Liquid metals : an introduction to the physics and chemistry of metals in the liquid state. Academic Press, New York
15. Dubberstein T, Heller H-P (2013) The thermophysical properties of liquid trip/twip-steel alloys using the maximum bubble pressure method. Adv Eng Mater 15:583–589. doi: 10.1002/adem.20120031010.1002/adem.201200310 ↗
16. Fainerman V, Miller R (2004) Maximum bubble pressure tensiometry—an analysis of experimental constraints. Adv Colloid Interface Sci 108–109:287–301. doi: 10.1016/j.cis.2003.10.01010.1016/j.cis.2003.10.010 ↗
17. Lang ND, Kohn W (1971) Theory of metal surfaces: work function. Phys Rev B 3:1215–122310.1103/PhysRevB.3.1215 ↗
18. Schrödinger E (1915) Notiz über den Kapillardruck in Gasblasen. Ann Phys 351:413–418. doi: 10.1002/andp.1915351030610.1002/andp.19153510306 ↗
19. Lee J, Kiyose A, Nakatsuka S et al (2004) Improvements in surface tension measurements of liquid metals having low capillary constants by the constrained drop method. ISIJ Int 44:1793–179910.2355/isijinternational.44.1793 ↗
20. Naidich YV, Eremenko VN (1961) The “large drop” method for determining the surface tension and the density of molten metals. Fiz Met Metallov 11:883–888
21. Padday JF (1972) Sessile drop profiles: corrected methods for surface tension and spreading coefficients. Proc R Soc Lond A 330:561–572. doi: 10.2307/7821110.1098/rspa.1972.0159 ↗
22. Tanaka T, Lee J (2014) Experiments. Treatise on Process Metallurgy. Elsevier, Amsterdam, pp 19–3410.1016/B978-0-08-096984-8.00027-6 ↗
23. Dubberstein T, Jahn A, Lange M et al (2014) Interfacial reaction between iron-based alloys and polycrystalline Al2O3. Steel Res Int 85:1220–1228. doi: 10.1002/srin.20130044510.1002/srin.201300445 ↗
24. Oeters F (1989) Metallurgie der Stahlherstellung. Springer, Berlin10.1007/978-3-642-51165-3 ↗
25. Egry I, Sauerland S, Jacobs G (1994) Surface tension of levitated liquid noble metals. High Temp High Pressures 26:217–223
26. Egry I, Ratke L, Kolbe M et al (2010) Interfacial properties of immiscible Co–Cu alloys. J Mater Sci 45:1979–1985. doi: 10.1007/s10853-009-3890-010.1007/s10853-009-3890-0 ↗
27. Cummings DL, Blackburn DA (1991) Oscillations of magnetically levitated aspherical droplets. J Fluid Mech 224:395–41610.1017/S0022112091001817 ↗
28. Mills KC, Brooks RF (1994) Measurements of thermophysical properties in high temperature melts. Mater Sci Eng A 178:77–8110.1016/0921-5093(94)90522-3 ↗
29. Zhong L, Zeze M, Mukai K (2005) Density of liquid if steel containing Ti. ISIJ Int 45:312–31510.2355/isijinternational.45.312 ↗
30. Li Z, Mukai K, Zeze M, Mills KC (2005) Determination of the surface tension of liquid stainless steel. J Mater Sci 40:2191–2195. doi: 10.1007/s10853-005-1931-x10.1007/s10853-005-1931-x ↗
31. Assael MJ, Kakosimos K, Banish RM et al (2006) Reference data for the density and viscosity of liquid aluminum and liquid iron. J Phys Chem Ref Data 35:285–30010.1063/1.2149380 ↗
32. Mills KC (2002) Recommended values of thermophysical properties for selected commercial alloys. Woodhead, Cambridge10.1533/9781845690144 ↗
33. Matsumoto T, Misono T, Fujii H, Nogi K (2005) Surface tension of molten stainless steels under plasma conditions. J Mater Sci 40:2197–2200. doi: 10.1007/s10853-005-1932-910.1007/s10853-005-1932-9 ↗
34. Kobatake H, Brillo J (2013) Density and thermal expansion of Cr–Fe, Fe–Ni, and Cr–Ni binary liquid alloys. J Mater Sci 48:4934–4941. doi: 10.1007/s10853-013-7274-010.1007/s10853-013-7274-0 ↗
35. Choe J, Kim HG, Jeon Y et al (2014) Surface tension measurements of 430 stainless steel. ISIJ Int 54:2104–2108. doi: 10.2355/isijinternational.54.210410.2355/isijinternational.54.2104 ↗
36. Lee J, Thu Hoai L, Shin M (2011) Density and surface tension of liquid Fe–Mn alloys. Metall Mater Trans B 42:546–54910.1007/s11663-011-9490-9 ↗
37. Keene BJ (1988) Review of data for the surface tension of iron and its binary alloys. Int Mater Rev 33:1–3710.1179/imr.1988.33.1.1 ↗
38. McNallan MJ, DebRoy T (1991) Effect of temperature and composition on surface tension in Fe–Ni–Cr alloys containing sulfur. Metall Mater Trans B 22:557–56010.1007/BF02654294 ↗
39. Wunderlich RK, Fecht H-J, Schick M, Egry I (2011) Time dependent effects in surface tension measurements of an industrial Fe-alloy. Steel Res Int 82:746–752. doi: 10.1002/srin.20100015610.1002/srin.201000156 ↗
40. Sahoo P, Debroy T, McNallan MJ (1988) Surface tension of binary metal-surface active solute systems under conditions relevant to welding metallurgy. Metall Trans B 19:483–49110.1007/BF02657748 ↗
41. Xue XM, Jiang HG, Sui ZT et al (1996) Influence of phosphorus addition on the surface tension of liquid iron and segregation of phosphorus on the surface of Fe-P alloy. Metall Mater Trans B 27:71–7910.1007/BF02915079 ↗
42. Dubberstein T, Hötzel M, Hagemann R et al (2011) Some thermophysical properties of liquid Cr–Mn–Ni-Steels. Steel Res Int 82:1122–1128. doi: 10.1002/srin.20110009610.1002/srin.201100096 ↗
43. Mills KC, Su YC (2006) Review of surface tension data for metallic elements and alloys: part 1—pure metals. Int Mater Rev 51:329–351. doi: 10.1179/174328006X10251010.1179/174328006X102510 ↗