High-velocity impact deformation and perforation of fibre metal laminates
Source abstract
Abstract
The quasi-static flexural and impact performance, up to projectile impact velocities of about 270 m s−1, of fibre metal laminates (FMLs), which consist of relatively thin, alternately stacked, layers of an aluminium alloy and a thermoset glass fibre epoxy composite, have been investigated. The effects of varying (a) the yield strength, tensile strength and ductility of the aluminium alloy layer, (b) the surface treatment used for the aluminium alloy layers and (c) the number of layers present in the FML have been studied. It was found that increasing the strength of the aluminium alloy increases the quasi-static flexural strength of the FML, providing that good adhesion is achieved between the metal and the composite layers. Further, increasing the number of alternating layers of the aluminium alloy and fibre composite also somewhat increases the quasi-static flexural properties of the FML. In contrast, increasing the strength of the aluminium alloy had relatively little effect on the impact perforation resistance of the FML, but increasing the number of alternating layers of aluminium alloy and fibre composite did significantly increase the impact perforation resistance of the FML. The degree of adhesion achieved between the layers had only a negligible influence on the impact perforation resistance.
Source: openalex_inverted_index · Quality: baseline
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Mechanical Behavior of Composites · High-Velocity Impact and Material Behavior · Structural Response to Dynamic Loads
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
References (38)
Show source-provided references
1. Cortes P, Cantwell W (2006) The prediction of tensile failure in titanium-based thermoplastic fibre–metal laminates. Compos Sci Technol 66(13):2306–231610.1016/j.compscitech.2005.11.031 ↗
2. Vogelesang L, Vlot A (2000) Development of fibre metal laminates for advanced aerospace structures. J Mater Process Technol 103(1):1–510.1016/S0924-0136(00)00411-8 ↗
3. Gresham J, Cantwell W, Cardew-Hall M, Compston P, Kalyanasundaram S (2006) Drawing behaviour of metal–composite sandwich structures. Compos Struct 75(1):305–31210.1016/j.compstruct.2006.04.010 ↗
4. Sinmazçelik T, Avcu E, Bora MÖ, Çoban O (2011) A review: fibre metal laminates, background, bonding types and applied test methods. Mater Des 32(7):3671–368510.1016/j.matdes.2011.03.011 ↗
5. Zhou J, Guan ZW, Cantwell WJ (2015) The influence of strain-rate on the perforation resistance of fiber metal laminates. Compos Struct 125:247–25510.1016/j.compstruct.2015.02.034 ↗
6. Cortes P, Cantwell WJ (2004) The tensile and fatigue properties of carbon fiber-reinforced PEEK-titanium fiber-metal laminates. J Reinf Plast Compos 23(15):1615–162310.1177/0731684404039796 ↗
7. Alderliesten R, Rans C, Benedictus R (2008) The applicability of magnesium based fibre metal laminates in aerospace structures. Compos Sci Technol 68(14):2983–299310.1016/j.compscitech.2008.06.017 ↗
8. Botelho EC, Silva RA, Pardini LC, Rezende MC (2006) A review on the development and properties of continuous fiber/epoxy/aluminum hybrid composites for aircraft structures. Mater Res 9(3):247–25610.1590/S1516-14392006000300002 ↗
9. Vlot A (1996) Impact loading on fibre metal laminates. Int J Impact Eng 18(3):291–30710.1016/0734-743X(96)89050-6 ↗
10. Reid SR, Zhou G (2000) Impact behaviour of fibre-reinforced composite materials and structures. Elsevier, Amsterdam
11. Airoldi A, Vesco M, Van Der Zwaag S, Baldi A, Sala G (2009) Damage in GLARE laminates under indentation loads: experimental and numerical results. In: Proceedings of the 17th international conference on composite materials, 2009. Edinburgh, UK
12. Lin C, Fatt MSH (2006) Perforation of composite plates and sandwich panels under quasi-static and projectile loading. J Compos Mater 40(20):1801–184010.1177/0021998306060173 ↗
13. Sitnikova E, Guan Z, Schleyer G, Cantwell W (2014) Modelling of perforation failure in fibre metal laminates subjected to high impulsive blast loading. Int J Solids Struct 51(18):3135–314610.1016/j.ijsolstr.2014.05.010 ↗
14. Zhu S, Chai GB (2012) Low-velocity impact response of fibre–metal laminates—Experimental and finite element analysis. Compos Sci Technol 72(15):1793–180210.1016/j.compscitech.2012.07.016 ↗
15. Reyes Villanueva G, Cantwell WJ (2004) The high velocity impact response of composite and FML-reinforced sandwich structures. Compos Sci Technol 64(1):35–5410.1016/S0266-3538(03)00197-0 ↗
16. Reyes Villanueva G, Cantwell WJ (2000) The mechanical properties of fibre-metal laminates based on glass fibre reinforced polypropylene. Compos Sci Technol 60(7):1085–109410.1016/S0266-3538(00)00002-6 ↗
17. Carrillo JG, Cantwell WJ (2009) Mechanical properties of a novel fiber–metal laminate based on a polypropylene composite. Mech Mater 41(7):828–83810.1016/j.mechmat.2009.03.002 ↗
18. Dhaliwal GS, Newaz GM (2016) Experimental and numerical investigation of flexural behavior of carbon fiber reinforced aluminum laminates. J Reinf Plast Compos 35(12):945–95610.1177/0731684416632606 ↗
19. Langdon GS, Lemanski SL, Nurick GN, Simmons MC, Cantwell WJ, Schleyer GK (2007) Behaviour of fibre–metal laminates subjected to localised blast loading: part I—experimental observations. Int J Impact Eng 34(7):1202–122210.1016/j.ijimpeng.2006.05.008 ↗
20. Lemanski SL, Nurick GN, Langdon GS, Simmons MC, Cantwell WJ, Schleyer GK (2007) Behaviour of fibre metal laminates subjected to localised blast loading—Part II: quantitative analysis. Int J Impact Eng 34(7):1223–124510.1016/j.ijimpeng.2006.05.009 ↗
21. Vlot A (1993) Impact properties of fibre metal laminates. Compos Eng 3(10):911–92710.1016/0961-9526(93)90001-Z ↗
22. Santiago R, Cantwell W, Alves M (2017) Impact on thermoplastic fibre-metal laminates: experimental observations. Compos Struct 159:800–81710.1016/j.compstruct.2016.10.011 ↗
23. Caprino G, Spataro G, Del Luongo S (2004) Low-velocity impact behaviour of fibreglass–aluminium laminates. Compos A Appl Sci Manuf 35(5):605–61610.1016/j.compositesa.2003.11.003 ↗
24. Asaee Z, Shadlou S, Taheri F (2015) Low-velocity impact response of fiberglass/magnesium FMLs with a new 3D fiberglass fabric. Compos Struct 122:155–16510.1016/j.compstruct.2014.11.038 ↗
25. Hoo Fatt MS, Lin C, Revilock DM Jr, Hopkins DA (2003) Ballistic impact of GLARE™ fiber–metal laminates. Compos Struct 61(1–2):73–8810.1016/S0263-8223(03)00036-9 ↗
26. Compston P, Cantwell WJ, Jones N (2002) Influence of loading rate on the interfacial fracture toughness of a polyamide-based fiber-metal laminate. J Mater Sci Lett 21(5):383–38610.1023/A:1014955101128 ↗
27. Abdullah MR, Cantwell WJ (2006) The impact resistance of polypropylene-based fibre–metal laminates. Compo Sci Technol 66(11–12):1682–169310.1016/j.compscitech.2005.11.008 ↗
28. Reid SR, Wen HM (2000) Perforation of FRP laminates and sandwich panels subjected to missile impact. Impact behaviour of fibre-reinforced composite materials and structures. Woodhead Publishing, Sawston, pp 239–27910.1533/9781855738904.239 ↗
29. Chai GB, Manikandan P (2014) Low velocity impact response of fibre-metal laminates—a review. Compos Struct 107:363–38110.1016/j.compstruct.2013.08.003 ↗
30. Majzoobi GH, Azadikhah K, Nemati J (2009) The effects of deep rolling and shot peening on fretting fatigue resistance of Aluminum-7075-T6. Mater Sci Eng A 516(1–2):235–24710.1016/j.msea.2009.03.020 ↗
31. Standard A (2015) D7264 Standard test method for flexural properties of polymer composite materials. American Society for Testing and Materials, Philadelphia
32. Mohagheghian I, Wang Y, Zhou J, Yu L, Guo X, Yan Y, Charalambides MN, Dear JP (2017) Deformation and damage mechanisms of laminated glass windows subjected to high velocity soft impact. Int J Solids Struct 109:46–6210.1016/j.ijsolstr.2017.01.006 ↗
33. Aramis (2011) User information—hardware GOM. p 11
34. Lambert JP, Jonas GH (1976) Towards satndardization of in terminal ballistic testing: ~velocity representation. Ballistic Research Laboratories, 1976. BRL-R-18522, Aberdeen, Maryland, USA10.21236/ADA021389 ↗
35. Bailey C, Bull T, Lawrence A (2013) The bending of beams and the second moment of area. Plymouth Stud Sci 6(2):328–339
36. Mohagheghian I, McShane GJ, Stronge WJ (2015) Impact perforation of monolithic polyethylene plates: projectile nose shape dependence. Int J Impact Eng 80:162–17610.1016/j.ijimpeng.2015.02.002 ↗
37. Holmen JK, Johnsen J, Jupp S, Hopperstad OS, Børvik T (2013) Effects of heat treatment on the ballistic properties of AA6070 aluminium alloy. Int J Impact Eng 57:119–13310.1016/j.ijimpeng.2013.02.002 ↗
38. Mondal C, Mishra B, Jena PK, Kumar KS, Bhat TB (2011) Effect of heat treatment on the behavior of an AA7055 aluminum alloy during ballistic impact. Int J Impact Eng 38(8–9):745–75410.1016/j.ijimpeng.2011.03.001 ↗