journal article·2009-01

The effect of rubber micro-particles and silica nano-particles on the tensile fatigue behaviour of a glass-fibre epoxy composite

C. M. Manjunatha, A. C. Taylor, A. J. Kinloch, S. Sprenger

Journal of Materials Science· Volume 44· Issue 1
Publisher page

Abstract

Fibre-reinforced polymer (FRP) matrix composites are widely used in airframe structural components. Although composites offer good and useful structural properties, they are brittle. Indeed, the commonly employed thermosetting epoxy matrices typically have a poor resistance to crack initiation and growth. Therefore, efforts have been made to improve the mechanical properties of the epoxy polymeric matrix, and thereby the properties of FRPs, through the incorporation of second-phase particles in the resin matrix [1–8]. The addition of micrometre-sized rubber particles [1–3] and, more recently, nano-sized silica (SiO2) particles [4–8], into an epoxy polymer have been shown to improve the fracture energy of bulk epoxies by up to 10–15 times, without significantly impairing their other desirable engineering properties [5]. FRPs based upon such particle reinforced matrices have also shown a remarkable improvement in their interlaminar fracture energy [6, 8]. If this enhanced toughness was accompanied by improved fatigue behaviour, then these materials would be highly attractive for structural applications.
Source: openaire · Quality: candidate unverified · Source record ↗

Research context

OpenAlex topics: Epoxy Resin Curing Processes · Mechanical Behavior of Composites · Fiber-reinforced polymer composites

SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.

References (14)

Show source-provided references
1. Drake RS, Siebert AR (1975) SAMPE Quart 6(4):11
2. Kinloch AJ, Shaw SJ, Tod DA, Hunston DL (1983) Polymer 24:134110.1016/0032-3861(83)90070-8 ↗
3. Yee AF, Pearson RA (1986) J Mater Sci 21:2462. doi: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF0111429310.1007/BF01114293 ↗
4. Kinloch AJ (2003) MRS Bull 28(6):44510.1557/mrs2003.126 ↗
5. Kinloch AJ, Mohammed RD, Taylor AC, Eger C, Sprenger S, Egan D (2005) J Mater Sci 40:5083. doi: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10853-005-1716-210.1007/s10853-005-1716-2 ↗
6. Kinloch AJ, Mohammed RD, Taylor AC, Sprenger S, Egan D (2006) J Mater Sci 41:5043. doi: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10853-006-0130-810.1007/s10853-006-0130-8 ↗
7. Johnsen BB, Kinloch AJ, Mohammed RD, Taylor AC, Sprenger S (2007) Polymer 48:53010.1016/j.polymer.2006.11.038 ↗
8. Caccavale V, Wichmann MHG, Quaresimin M, Schulte K (2007) In: AIAS XXXVI Convegno Nazionale, Ischia, Napoli, 4–8 Sept 2007
9. Summerscales J, Searle TJ (2005) Proc IMechE: J Mater Des Appl 219:4510.1243/095441005X9094 ↗
10. American Society for Testing and Materials (2003) Standard test method for tensile properties of polymer matrix composite materials, ASTM D3039, Annual book of ASTM Standards, vol 15.03. American Society for Testing and Materials, PA, USA
11. Talreja R (1987) Fatigue of composite materials. Technomic, Lancaster, PA, USA
12. Case SW, Reifsnider KL (2003) In: Milne I, Ritchie RO, Karihaloo B (eds) Comprehensive structural integrity volume 4: cyclic loading and fatigue, 1st edn. Elsevier Science, Amsterdam
13. Gagel A, Lange D, Schulte K (2006) Composites Part A 37:22210.1016/j.compositesa.2005.03.028 ↗
14. Blackman BRK, Kinloch AJ, Sohn Lee J, Taylor AC, Agarwal R, Schueneman G, Sprenger S (2007) J Mater Sci 42:7049. doi: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10853-007-1768-610.1007/s10853-007-1768-6 ↗